• Welcome to the Internet Infidels Discussion Board.

Well... it's Trump... again. #47, here we go.

View attachment 54671

Playing the devil's advocate only 3 out of the 12 visible (25%) are not wearing a hijab/chador.
Certainly not every child but a very high proportion are.

I'll give him a 'D'. Needs to be more precise.
Yeah, utmost precision is needed in racist attacks on 5 and 6 year olds.
 
View attachment 54671

Playing the devil's advocate only 3 out of the 12 visible (25%) are not wearing a hijab/chador.
Certainly not every child but a very high proportion are.

I'll give him a 'D'. Needs to be more precise.
Meh
When I was a kid our grade school had strict dress code/uniform. I don't see this as particularly different.
Tom
 
View attachment 54671

Playing the devil's advocate only 3 out of the 12 visible (25%) are not wearing a hijab/chador.
Certainly not every child but a very high proportion are.

I'll give him a 'D'. Needs to be more precise.
Wow!!! you're defending that?
Of course not.
The claim that all children are wearing hijabs was incorrectly.

I do wish Trump could aim for more precision, amongst so many other things he lacks.
Pity his staff cannot rein in his impusle control problems.
 
View attachment 54671

Playing the devil's advocate only 3 out of the 12 visible (25%) are not wearing a hijab/chador.
Certainly not every child but a very high proportion are.

I'll give him a 'D'. Needs to be more precise.
Wow!!! you're defending that?
Of course not.
The claim that all children are wearing hijabs was incorrectly.

I do wish Trump could aim for more precision, amongst so many other things he lacks.
Pity his staff cannot rein in his impusle control problems.
That's what you got out of that???
 
View attachment 54671

Playing the devil's advocate only 3 out of the 12 visible (25%) are not wearing a hijab/chador.
Certainly not every child but a very high proportion are.

I'll give him a 'D'. Needs to be more precise.
Wow!!! you're defending that?
Of course not.
The claim that all children are wearing hijabs was incorrectly.

I do wish Trump could aim for more precision, amongst so many other things he lacks.
Pity his staff cannot rein in his impusle control problems.
Precision isn’t a high priority for pathologically lying narcissistic sociopaths, I guess.
 
Just be thankful that it wasn't a wheeze. Donald Trump can solve any problem with a properly applied tariff. Let's see what he can do to stop Canadian forest fires with his power to punish countries that pollute our air. It may not seem totally legal, but the Supreme Court may decide to rule on the question next year sometime. Or not. You never know. Anyway, he should have the problem well in hand by then.
 
1784674420589.png

Number of manufacturing jobs have actually fallen since January 2025.

 
View attachment 54781

Number of manufacturing jobs have actually fallen since January 2025.


Perhaps, but think of how many more did not disappear. The vast majority of jobs are still there. Doesn't he get credit for the millions of manufacturing jobs that are still there?
 
View attachment 54781

Number of manufacturing jobs have actually fallen since January 2025.


Perhaps, but think of how many more did not disappear. The vast majority of jobs are still there. Doesn't he get credit for the millions of manufacturing jobs that are still there?
How so? There were more jobs before him?
 
Donald J. Trump
@realDonaldTrump

MAGA CANDIDATES WON EVERYTHING LAST NIGHT IN ARIZONA, A COMPLETE SWEEP!!!
I WON ARIZONA 18 MONTHS AGO.
THE DUMOCRATS ARE DUMBFOUNDED.
AFTER DECADES, ARIZONA IS BECOMING A REPUBLICAN STATE.
CONGRATULATIONS TO ALL!
President DONALD J. TRUMP
Does he understand what a primary election is?
 
Donald J. Trump
@realDonaldTrump

MAGA CANDIDATES WON EVERYTHING LAST NIGHT IN ARIZONA, A COMPLETE SWEEP!!!
I WON ARIZONA 18 MONTHS AGO.
THE DUMOCRATS ARE DUMBFOUNDED.
AFTER DECADES, ARIZONA IS BECOMING A REPUBLICAN STATE.
CONGRATULATIONS TO ALL!
President DONALD J. TRUMP
Does he understand what a primary election is?
Yore a low IQ dumocrat.
 
View attachment 54781

Number of manufacturing jobs have actually fallen since January 2025.


Perhaps, but think of how many more did not disappear. The vast majority of jobs are still there. Doesn't he get credit for the millions of manufacturing jobs that are still there?
How so? There were more jobs before him?
My facetious attempt at playing devil's advocate seems not to have impressed you. :sneaky:
 
Back
Top Bottom