bilby
Fair dinkum thinkum
- Joined
- Mar 6, 2007
- Messages
- 36,353
- Gender
- He/Him
- Basic Beliefs
- Strong Atheist
Ok but if you're citing instances where there isn't suffering, one can't even ask what it is that causes the suffering in that case.
I didn't say there was no suffering, just in the context of anti-natalism there may be cases where life is worth living, and others where it's not.
Sure. You could say that. At this point, I'm by and large enjoying my life, for instance. I've no intention of pressing the eject button, yet.
But that still doesn't take away from the fact (I think it's a fact) that reproducing is the primary cause of all human suffering. Without it, all human suffering would end.
That's cute. It's simultaneously undeniably true, and completely useless.
The fact is that the primary cause of aircraft crashes is the flying of planes. Why the FAA and NTSB are not simply banning aviation, in order to eliminate this primary cause of these disasters, is a complete mystery.