- Joined
- Oct 22, 2002
- Messages
- 42,060
- Location
- Frozen in Michigan
- Gender
- Old Fart
- Basic Beliefs
- Don't be a dick.
Under the Skin
Scarlett Johansson naked?
Whaaaa...
Under the Skin
Scarlett Johansson naked?
That works better.The whole, just gonna arm my people thing. For instance, a lot of the trouble in Africa is not going to be helped by arming people, because who do you arm? The colonization splintered the populations, so that they would war with each other, instead of with the oppressing regime. So who exactly do you side with? If he wants to arm Africa, it is going to take a lot more coordination to pull it off, than just sending ships with weapons. And seeing that Africa isn't currently being oppressed by Europe, rather they are suffering from the long term affects of said earlier oppression, Africans will be killing each other.
His problem with Wakanda not helping is fine, but the trouble is, his plan firstly, does not address aiding African nation, but rather just arming them which ignores the real problem. In other words, I understand why he is upset, but his plan makes absolutely no sense.
- - - Updated - - -
I think the trouble is that you've pretty much taken any modicum of dissent as based on bigotry.Wow, so angry.
Why does this topic trigger you so much?
He wasn't talking about arming people in African countries. He was talking about arming African diaspora in the nations of the former colonial powers. I'm pretty sure he planned on helping the other African countries after gaining control of most of the world's resources, and I'm pretty sure his "help" would have involved some kind of externally imposed rule (thus making him nothing more than the next colonial invader).
Discuss bigotry all you like. I just think you’ve gone a bit hair trigger on it based on what you’ve seen as being sourced in bigotry by a couple of posters.That works better.The whole, just gonna arm my people thing. For instance, a lot of the trouble in Africa is not going to be helped by arming people, because who do you arm? The colonization splintered the populations, so that they would war with each other, instead of with the oppressing regime. So who exactly do you side with? If he wants to arm Africa, it is going to take a lot more coordination to pull it off, than just sending ships with weapons. And seeing that Africa isn't currently being oppressed by Europe, rather they are suffering from the long term affects of said earlier oppression, Africans will be killing each other.
His problem with Wakanda not helping is fine, but the trouble is, his plan firstly, does not address aiding African nation, but rather just arming them which ignores the real problem. In other words, I understand why he is upset, but his plan makes absolutely no sense.
- - - Updated - - -
I think the trouble is that you've pretty much taken any modicum of dissent as based on bigotry.
He wasn't talking about arming people in African countries. He was talking about arming African diaspora in the nations of the former colonial powers. I'm pretty sure he planned on helping the other African countries after gaining control of most of the world's resources, and I'm pretty sure his "help" would have involved some kind of externally imposed rule (thus making him nothing more than the next colonial invader).
I was responding to the first part, not the second part. I apologize if discussing bigotry upsets so many people.
It seems that an awful lot of people aren't offended by the existence of racism, but get very offended by discussing it.
Tell you what. If someone says something that sounds racist, what is the correct way to complain about it without triggering half the white people on this forum? Or should I just not say anything at all? Would that be better?
Discuss bigotry all you like. I just think you’ve gone a bit hair trigger on it based on what you’ve seen as being sourced in bigotry by a couple of posters.That works better.He wasn't talking about arming people in African countries. He was talking about arming African diaspora in the nations of the former colonial powers. I'm pretty sure he planned on helping the other African countries after gaining control of most of the world's resources, and I'm pretty sure his "help" would have involved some kind of externally imposed rule (thus making him nothing more than the next colonial invader).
I was responding to the first part, not the second part. I apologize if discussing bigotry upsets so many people.
It seems that an awful lot of people aren't offended by the existence of racism, but get very offended by discussing it.
Tell you what. If someone says something that sounds racist, what is the correct way to complain about it without triggering half the white people on this forum? Or should I just not say anything at all? Would that be better?
As far as the previous post, I think it still would have been better to keep that guy around for another movie. Granted, it would complicate things in Europe and America.
honestly i don't get why more people aren't clamoring over it, since in a vacuum it's like a bullet loaded into the gun of what is supposed to be the cultural zeitgeist right now, which kind of dovetails into what i think is a rather interesting observation about what people think people think about things, and what people actually think about things.I don't get why all the critics are clamoring over Annihilation.
Patriots Day
The story of the Boston Marathon Bombing and the manhunt for the perpetrators. Fast paced, seemed to follow pretty closely the series of events that went on in the days following the bombing, at least what I remember of them. Very gripping and well done. Actual participants and victims took part in the film. Well worth a couple hours watch.
When people give you reasons for why they hate something and the reasons don't make sense, it usually means they're not being honest about why they hate it.
And it's amusing that you are so offended by my use of "triggered" comments, given that the whole reason I do that is to show how shitty those "triggered" comments are. Bigots are the ones who normally use that term, and they're usually the biggest snowflakes.
No. I was going to suggest you see a proctologist in order get whatever it is removed from your ass too. I've ignored your unwarranted comments regarding exactly this stuff, but I'm glad someone else said something.
Wow, so angry.
Why does this topic trigger you so much?
"Capable" only in terms of usual hollywood horror movie sensibilities. But if they were really capable they would have turned back the moment they realized they were missing three days worth of rations and didn't know how they got there. Instead these experts just kind of shrug it off and move on. And the team does have its one crazy character who notices she's been "infected" but doesn't tell the rest, and then goes nuts.honestly i don't get why more people aren't clamoring over it, since in a vacuum it's like a bullet loaded into the gun of what is supposed to be the cultural zeitgeist right now, which kind of dovetails into what i think is a rather interesting observation about what people think people think about things, and what people actually think about things.I don't get why all the critics are clamoring over Annihilation.
a "smart" (at least within the sphere of how movies are considered) sci-fi film with an almost exclusively female cast where every character is strong and capable within her scientific and/or military field undertaking a mission with the expressly stated purposes of offering a non-violent solution to a problem... and nobody is talking about this in terms of representation, even though it half the cast is non-white and it features a lesbian.
At the risk of re-igniting a flame war over who's the most racially insensitive here, I offer this insightful (to me) analysis of the symbolism of Black Panther.
[YOUTUBE]https://youtu.be/FjqOCOAGTHw[/YOUTUBE]