1. You have failed to demonstrate that "black men between 10-35 are killing each other". You have produced a chart that indicates young black men tend to die from homicides - not that "black men... are killing each other."
2. I'm not blaming anything on anything. You are the one trying to demonstrate... something... and failing miserably.
3. You are the claiming, erroneously, that there must be some reason other than poverty for relatively high homicide rates in the US, and then compared the US to India claiming that India has 40-50% fewer homicides - except you were wrong.
Maybe you should just state plainly what it is you are trying to say.
Then let the Justice Department do it for me:
http://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/bvvc.pdf
In 2005 most homicides involving one victim and one
offender were intraracial. About 93% of black homicide victims and 85% of white victims in single victim and single
offender homicides were murdered by someone of their
race. Women were the offenders in about 10% of single
victim and single offender homicides of both blacks and whites.
Since black men between 18-35 have a much higher of homicide and 93% of the victims were killed by blacks, the real problem is not police killing black men, it's black men killing each other.
As to the bolding, the same applies to white men between the same ages, plus you are shifting goalposts again, so I still don't get your point.
You start by posting some random article about three black youths (who, btw, were all under 18 so what the heck did they have to do with your "18-35" statistic). You write, in that post,
When you excuse this kind of behavior because they have been discriminated against you condemn these people to a lifetime of misery. There is a problem in the black community that the black community must address.
I will repeat my original question: WHO is excusing the behavior of those three random youths?
Who are "these people"? As I also noted earlier, by YOUR OWN DATA, the leading killer of black males is heart disease (same as for white males). Is this the problem you think needs to be addressed in the black community?
And in any case, what does this have to do with the fact that a young black male is 21 times more likely to be shot by police than young white males?
You also threw in this random unsupported claim which, even if true, still has nothing whatsoever to do with the fact that young black men are 21 times more likely to be shot dead by police than are their white male contemporaries.
There is more poverty in India than in the US black community and they don't have the violent crime.
<<<<<-------- but it was actually thoroughly refuted
So then you throw out some random links without explanation.
As I said above, your first link shows that the number 1 killer of black males is heart disease.
Your second link says:
The report also stated that 85 percent of white victims in single-victim and single-offender homicides were murdered by someone of their race. So that means the majority of black and white people are murdered by someone of their own race. In 2005, there were 8,017 white homicide victims.
which is exactly what I also concluded
You can't account for this by cops shooting black males. This is way deeper than racism. There is a problem in the black community.
Who said that black on black homicide or white on white homicide accounts for cops shooting black males 21 times more often than white males? No one. Which is why I keep asking you exactly what it is you are trying to say.
Then there was this doozy on a nonsensical comment:
Implicitly you are by atributing this mainly to racism. Only a moron of epic proportions would eliminate racism as a factor. But when racism is used to excuse the fact that for a reason unknown to me black men will kill each other with impunity over nothing, it scares the heck out of me because that means we will never solve this problem.
though I think the bolded is where you start to say what you actually mean.
India has way more poverty than the US. Therefore if it was all about poverty, they would have more violent crime than the US when in fact they have a lower homicide rate than the US by between 40-50%.
<<<<<< ---------------- thoroughly refuted and a derail anyway
So now that we have completely eliminated your weird India comparison, you are still stuck on:
Since black men between 18-35 have a much higher of homicide and 93% of the victims were killed by blacks, the real problem is not police killing black men, it's black men killing each other.
Since white men between 18-35 have a much higher rate of homicide and 85% of the victims were killed by whites, the real problem is not police killing white men, it's white men killing each other. Therefore, in the world according to HaRaYah, we should just ignore any and all police misconduct? Is this your point?
