Jimmy Higgins
Contributor
- Joined
- Jan 31, 2001
- Messages
- 50,417
- Basic Beliefs
- Calvinistic Atheist
A heinous crime.
Was the sandwich criminal? Because the dog is supposed to take a bite out of crime.
I reported this post for... it's... it's just awful.
A heinous crime.
Was the sandwich criminal? Because the dog is supposed to take a bite out of crime.
Jayland Walker? He led the police on a car chase after being pulled over (or after they attempted pulling him over). Tamir Rice was in a park doing 12 year old stuff. Walker was shot ALOT after exiting the car in the middle of the night. Rice was shot in broad daylight after the police were on site for couple seconds.For letting a 12 y/o out with a dangerous object.Rice's family takes responsibility for the behavior of their 12 y/o child?
For playing with a toy gun at a recreation center? What does that look like exactly?
And not suing other people for $6 million because you were too negligent to mind your kid.
I'll feel the same way if the Akron shooting victim's family sues anyone.
Tom
If he had a real gun, your point wouldn't look as ridiculously nonsensical as it does.Rice's family takes responsibility for the behavior of their 12 y/o child?Do you consider those the only options?Do you believe that the $6 million settlement the City of Cleveland paid to the Rice family was an appropriate resolution to the wrongful death lawsuit, or do you hold the opinion that the actions of the police were justified under the circumstances, making the compensation unwarranted?
Tom
You're welcome to add your own.
We could start with that.
Tom
Jayland Walker?
Saying it's their job doesn't make it possible.Ut is their job to know. And killing somebody to find out is the wrong way to go about finding out.Police had no way of knowing that. By your "logic" police have nothing to fear from a real, but unloaded, gun either.What absolute crapola. Certainly in the case of Tamir Rice, your observation is utter nonsense, since Tamir Rice's "weapon" had no bullets.
WTAF!?! Doctors don't intentionally kill their patients before the initial evalauation.Saying it's their job doesn't make it possible.Ut is their job to know. And killing somebody to find out is the wrong way to go about finding out.Police had no way of knowing that. By your "logic" police have nothing to fear from a real, but unloaded, gun either.What absolute crapola. Certainly in the case of Tamir Rice, your observation is utter nonsense, since Tamir Rice's "weapon" had no bullets.
Every doctor is incompetent because their patients die.
A heinous crime.
Was the sandwich criminal? Because the dog is supposed to take a bite out of crime.
A heinous crime.
Was the sandwich criminal? Because the dog is supposed to take a bite out of crime.
I think the sandwich charge is just a bunch of baloney myself. This morning on the news I saw that his neighbors said they couldn't believe it when they heard about his crime. He had always been such a good boy.
Yes, I pooped my pants rationale.police are not required to wait until the perp gets a round off before they are allowed to use lethal force to protect themselves or others.
How many other kids were there? Kids who's behavior didn't result in 911 calls.So much violence, I get lost in the details.
Obviously not lost enough to blame parents for letting their kid play at a recreation center.
Kids who's behavior didn't result in 911 calls.
He's saying a good outcome is always possible if the person is competent.WTAF!?! Doctors don't intentionally kill their patients before the initial evalauation.Saying it's their job doesn't make it possible.Ut is their job to know. And killing somebody to find out is the wrong way to go about finding out.Police had no way of knowing that. By your "logic" police have nothing to fear from a real, but unloaded, gun either.What absolute crapola. Certainly in the case of Tamir Rice, your observation is utter nonsense, since Tamir Rice's "weapon" had no bullets.
Every doctor is incompetent because their patients die.
The real failure is that a 12 year old had access to a realistic replica in the first place.Kids who's behavior didn't result in 911 calls.
What behavior are you referring to, exactly? A child engaging in play at a recreation center with a toy gun? It seems rather unreasonable. The state is neither holding the officers accountable for misidentifying the toy gun as a real weapon, nor the 12-year-old for playing with a toy gun at the recreation center. Yet you personally chose to reproach the parents of a dead child for letting him play with a toy at a recreation center. I'm relieved to know that you have no interaction with them. I also have no further desire to delve into understanding the completely baffling motivations that might be driving your opinion.
So it’s the toy manufacturer’s fault. The cops should sue them for making their jobs not trivially easy.The real failure is that a 12 year old had access to a realistic replica in the first place.Kids who's behavior didn't result in 911 calls.
What behavior are you referring to, exactly? A child engaging in play at a recreation center with a toy gun? It seems rather unreasonable. The state is neither holding the officers accountable for misidentifying the toy gun as a real weapon, nor the 12-year-old for playing with a toy gun at the recreation center. Yet you personally chose to reproach the parents of a dead child for letting him play with a toy at a recreation center. I'm relieved to know that you have no interaction with them. I also have no further desire to delve into understanding the completely baffling motivations that might be driving your opinion.
A competent cop can assess a situation when he or she arrives on scene.He's saying a good outcome is always possible if the person is competent.WTAF!?! Doctors don't intentionally kill their patients before the initial evalauation.Saying it's their job doesn't make it possible.Ut is their job to know. And killing somebody to find out is the wrong way to go about finding out.Police had no way of knowing that. By your "logic" police have nothing to fear from a real, but unloaded, gun either.What absolute crapola. Certainly in the case of Tamir Rice, your observation is utter nonsense, since Tamir Rice's "weapon" had no bullets.
Every doctor is incompetent because their patients die.
Thus a competent doctor can always save your life.
That is total bullshit. The notion that police will necessarily die if they aren’t permitted to kill anyone who makes them afraid is morally depraved., neither of these officers was ever in danger from Tamir Rice. They allowed their fear/ cowardice overrule their moral duty. Thet didn’t bother to see if they were in danger. There is no evidence either of these officers exhibited minimal competence except under the depraved standards that they are alive and that the officers gunned down a deserving scary 12 year child.He's saying a good outcome is always possible if the person is competent.WTAF!?! Doctors don't intentionally kill their patients before the initial evalauation.Saying it's their job doesn't make it possible.Ut is their job to know. And killing somebody to find out is the wrong way to go about finding out.Police had no way of knowing that. By your "logic" police have nothing to fear from a real, but unloaded, gun either.What absolute crapola. Certainly in the case of Tamir Rice, your observation is utter nonsense, since Tamir Rice's "weapon" had no bullets.
Every doctor is incompetent because their patients die.
Thus a competent doctor can always save your life.
A heinous crime.
Was the sandwich criminal? Because the dog is supposed to take a bite out of crime.
I think the sandwich charge is just a bunch of baloney myself. This morning on the news I saw that his neighbors said they couldn't believe it when they heard about his crime. He had always been such a good boy.
They suspected someone else but they were barking up the wrong tree.