laughing dog
Contributor
It’s called bullshitting. And it is lying when the incident is nit a mistake.And this is lying? No, it's uncertainty. Somebody fabricates something about them, they can't quickly rule it out so they apologize, but in time we often see it was a fabrication.You said they apologize for “mistakes” without knowing the facts.Loren Pechtel said:And where have I said the IDF lies? I have said they make mistakes, but that's not the same as lying. I pointed out that the reporters were going with a quote that did not mean what was implied. (Saying they can't prove it's Hamas diverting the aid doesn't prove it's not.)
No, they said they found mo evidence of systemic diversion. No one claimed exoneration. You seem to be having reading comprehension issues today.Loren Pechtel said:They said they couldn't prove it was Hamas behind all the diversion. That is not the same as exonerating them. Since OJ wasn't the killer clearly his wife is still alive.The IDF report says they found no evidence of systemstic diversion by Hamas. That has nothing whatsoever do with whatever you imagine some reporters wrote.
The obvious point is that it rubbishes your claims about Hamas stealing most of the aid.