Split New York City Mayoral Race

[Loren Pechtel]

It's not the issue of the content. It's the issue that Qatari money comes with Qatari influence.

Assuming your premise is true (a dubious assumption), what do you think "Qatari influence" on Mamdani's mother is going to possibly accomplish?

How would you react if you had learned that Moscow funded the movies?

I'd ask the following question: what do you think "Russian influence" on Mamdani's mother is going to possibly accomplish?

You are still not addressing the issue, just trying to pretend it's irrelevant. Nor are you addressing the reframed issue of what if it was Moscow?

We don't know the details. That doesn't mean it's not highly suspect.

I am addressing the “issue”. You are not. I’ll ask a third time. Why is it highly suspect?

Because Qatari money comes with strings. They're doing it for influence, not from the goodness of their hearts.

You know this because….? And what strings?

You're still evading. Substitute "Moscow" for "Qatari" and evaluate it.

 

[laughing dog]

It's not the issue of the content. It's the issue that Qatari money comes with Qatari influence.

Assuming your premise is true (a dubious assumption), what do you think "Qatari influence" on Mamdani's mother is going to possibly accomplish?

How would you react if you had learned that Moscow funded the movies?

I'd ask the following question: what do you think "Russian influence" on Mamdani's mother is going to possibly accomplish?

You are still not addressing the issue, just trying to pretend it's irrelevant. Nor are you addressing the reframed issue of what if it was Moscow?

We don't know the details. That doesn't mean it's not highly suspect.

I am addressing the “issue”. You are not. I’ll ask a third time. Why is it highly suspect?

Because Qatari money comes with strings. They're doing it for influence, not from the goodness of their hearts.

You know this because….? And what strings?

You're still evading. Substitute "Moscow" for "Qatari" and evaluate it.

You are the one evading. I asked “what strings” twice. No answer.

And when you previously pulled the substitute Moscow for Qatar evasion in post #335, I responded with what one would expect Mamdani’s mother to accomplish (i.e. what string). You responded I was not addressing the issue.

As far as I can tell, the issue is your paranoia over Qatari influence to some unspecified end that you are unable to explain.

 

[Loren Pechtel]

It's not the issue of the content. It's the issue that Qatari money comes with Qatari influence.

Assuming your premise is true (a dubious assumption), what do you think "Qatari influence" on Mamdani's mother is going to possibly accomplish?

How would you react if you had learned that Moscow funded the movies?

I'd ask the following question: what do you think "Russian influence" on Mamdani's mother is going to possibly accomplish?

You are still not addressing the issue, just trying to pretend it's irrelevant. Nor are you addressing the reframed issue of what if it was Moscow?

We don't know the details. That doesn't mean it's not highly suspect.

I am addressing the “issue”. You are not. I’ll ask a third time. Why is it highly suspect?

Because Qatari money comes with strings. They're doing it for influence, not from the goodness of their hearts.

You know this because….? And what strings?

You're still evading. Substitute "Moscow" for "Qatari" and evaluate it.

You are the one evading. I asked “what strings” twice. No answer.

And when you previously pulled the substitute Moscow for Qatar evasion in post #335, I responded with what one would expect Mamdani’s mother to accomplish (i.e. what string). You responded I was not addressing the issue.

As far as I can tell, the issue is your paranoia over Qatari influence to some unspecified end that you are unable to explain.

We don't know exactly what they expect for their money. I'm simply comparing it to another situation with taking money from a hostile power.

 

[laughing dog]

It's not the issue of the content. It's the issue that Qatari money comes with Qatari influence.

Assuming your premise is true (a dubious assumption), what do you think "Qatari influence" on Mamdani's mother is going to possibly accomplish?

How would you react if you had learned that Moscow funded the movies?

I'd ask the following question: what do you think "Russian influence" on Mamdani's mother is going to possibly accomplish?

You are still not addressing the issue, just trying to pretend it's irrelevant. Nor are you addressing the reframed issue of what if it was Moscow?

We don't know the details. That doesn't mean it's not highly suspect.

I am addressing the “issue”. You are not. I’ll ask a third time. Why is it highly suspect?

Because Qatari money comes with strings. They're doing it for influence, not from the goodness of their hearts.

You know this because….? And what strings?

You're still evading. Substitute "Moscow" for "Qatari" and evaluate it.

You are the one evading. I asked “what strings” twice. No answer.

And when you previously pulled the substitute Moscow for Qatar evasion in post #335, I responded with what one would expect Mamdani’s mother to accomplish (i.e. what string). You responded I was not addressing the issue.

As far as I can tell, the issue is your paranoia over Qatari influence to some unspecified end that you are unable to explain.

We don't know exactly what they expect for their money. I'm simply comparing it to another situation with taking money from a hostile power.

In other words, paranoia.

 

[unapologetic]

paranoia over Qatari influence to some unspecified end that you are unable to explain.

The detales don't matter. ANY influence they have to bribe for can not be good for us. Bribery is alwas a red flag.