• Welcome to the Internet Infidels Discussion Board.

How should west respond to Russian invasion of Ukraine?

"How should west respond to Russian invasion of Ukraine?"

How should the world respond to the American invasion of Iran, and collection of toll from shippers? Any different from the Iranian toll?
The Iranian toll has some justification due to the Strait being along Iran's coast and Iran having a legitimate security and environmental concern about ship traffic there. The American toll has no justification other than Might Makes Right.
The Iranian toll made no sense. The original shipping channel did not go through Iranian waters at all. They mined the shipping channel and started charging tolls for ships going through Iranian waters to avoid the mines.
 
Do you really think that if Ukraine agreed to de-arm, layoff their soldiers and give up aspirations to join the EU that Russia would leave them alone??
You do understand that for the most of their 35 year long history Ukraine had been left alone (by Russia) and un-armed?
Because they were being run by your puppet. When you lost that control you responded with an invasion.
 
It is your side that yesterday threatened to attack western peacekeepers
Nope, these are not peacekeepers, these are terrorists.
How would that even be possible? They would be in Ukraine, not able to commit terror in Russia. And they don't exist, so how would you know they are terrorists? You are showing Russia intends bad faith towards Ukraine.
 
Do you really think that if Ukraine agreed to de-arm, layoff their soldiers and give up aspirations to join the EU that Russia would leave them alone??
You do understand that for the most of their 35 year long history Ukraine had been left alone (by Russia) and un-armed?
Because they were being run by your puppet. When you lost that control you responded with an invasion.
Yanukovish had been president for ~2years. And he was not really our puppet.
The rest were YOUR puppets, some flat out nazis.
 

The Wildberries attacks were correct--they actually had a search category for stuff for the war. That's not staying out of it!
You are disgusting!
They were selling the same shit Amazon sells, exactly the same.
By your loginc Russia has a right to bomb Amazon.
 
It is your side that yesterday threatened to attack western peacekeepers
Nope, these are not peacekeepers, these are terrorists.
How would that even be possible? They would be in Ukraine, not able to commit terror in Russia. And they don't exist, so how would you know they are terrorists? You are showing Russia intends bad faith towards Ukraine.
The EuroNazi plan is to use these "peacekeepers" as a human shield for ukro-naizes temporary ceasefire for rearmament of Kiev regime. You are not fooling anybody in Russia.
We need to exterminate Kiev regime completely without remnants of any kind.
Ideally their western masters should be exterminated too, but that is completely impractical.
 
Last edited:
The Soviet paradigm was make everybody equal, equally miserable.

We Russians can't let Ukrainians be enjoying freedoms and having good times, we need to drag them down with us.
actually, most soviet people were less miserable than most americans now.
:hysterical: :slowclap:

A question to ponder.
If US citizens could go to Russia with no strings nor questions asked and vice-versa for Russians, in which direction would the planes be most full?
Most people would stay in their countries in both countries most of the time.
and it is really stupid question. You constantly create shit for Russia and then come and say "See Russia is a bad country!"
When in reality it is you who is a bad country because you are actively shit everywhere, that's is how you keep appearance of less shit inside your own country.

It does not work anymore. You can't shit in Russia and you especially can't shit in China.
Between March and August of 2022, more than half a million men left Russia in a hurry. Since then, that many have left this world.
Have you counted ukrainians who left Ukraine?
Ukraine is 20mil people country now. It was 51 million in 1991
 
A new thread could be ...

'How should Russia respond to the possibility the conflict it started may not be win Able''
 
When George Washington left orifice and peacefully returned to private life he set the stage for peaceful transfer of powerthrough a democratic process. Revolutionary in the day.
Left orifice? You mean Washington is an asshole?
I think it means he came out of one.
Steve’s syntax often goes over my head tho …
 
A new thread could be ...

'How should Russia respond to the possibility the conflict it started may not be win Able''
Russia did not start it and we are winning anyway. Last I heard Putin was pretty giddy
Trump is telling us regularly about how much Iranian ass he's kicking.
Tom
 
A new thread could be ...

'How should Russia respond to the possibility the conflict it started may not be win Able''
Russia did not start it and we are winning anyway. Last I heard Putin was pretty giddy
This much after four years and a half million dead Russians is winning?

1785352856235.png

The red is Russian Occupation
The blue is Ukraine counter offences
 
That second paragraph is describing you and Putin to a T.
Trump is ahead of all them. He is more machiavellion than any other politician.
No. His actions are 100% stupid.

Virtually everything he has done has turned to shit. Even when he supposedly sets out to do something right he always does it wrong. At this point the only thing that isn't 100% pure shit is his going after DEI--and that's purely stopped clock, he's not trying to fix anything, but playing to the Nazi elements.
 
I actually have my doubts about that considering the source.
I suspect "on the battlefield" is distorting the picture. 20-30 minutes from detection, easily could be. It's a war of sneaking around.
 
Actually, "Cheato" is a shortened form of "Cheato Benito", which is one of the many pejorative nicknames for Donald Trump in social media. He is called that because of his long history of unlawful behavior and the first name of former Italian fascist dictator Benito Mussolini. Both components of the nickname are well-earned.
Thanks for an excellent explanation. "Cheato" is not satisfied with what he has achieved till now, he is trying to do even better.

Another matter: I am disappointed that there have been so many strikes in these wars but the number of deaths have not been as high. I would not like to fire a bomb if it does not kill at least 50 people.
And you yet again show you know nothing of such matters. If the enemy has bombers in your skies you don't put 50 people together unless you have to. A ship might have 50 or more crew and be sunk by a single bomb. And even without bombers--there were some Russian windbags that thought addressing a bunch of their troops while in HIMARS range was a good idea. In war, you likely don't live long enough to learn from your mistakes.
 
And yet accepted (by Ukraine) body exchange ratio is 30 to 1 in favor of Russia.
That is 30 dead ukrainin soldiers per 1 russian dead soldier.
CIA director is a liar, this is in his job description.

The mere fact that Defense minister was sacked should give you a clue that not everything is good in Ukraine. In fact everything is bad there for them.

ha ha ha. That's just an absurd figure. Do you really believe that. The estimates that I hear that a million Russian soldiers are dead. That would mean 30 million Ukrainians? Come on, use some common sense. Neither side has an incentive to say the truth here. But Russian soldiers are crossing land and attacking into fortified Ukrainian defensive positions. There is no doubt that more Russians are dying in these frontal attacks than Ukrainians. The people feeding you the 30:1 ratio are pulling your chain. Quit being so gullible!
Actually, I don't find it insane. At this point the war is mostly Russia trying to infiltrate Ukranian defenses and generally failing. How many bodies are retrieved is likely very different than how many casualties there are. I do not know the numbers, but I find it entirely plausible that Ukraine recovers very few Russian bodies.
 
Another matter: I am disappointed that there have been so many strikes in these wars but the number of deaths have not been as high. I would not like to fire a bomb if it does not kill at least 50 people.
I think you have it backwards; More people are killed per bomb now than was the case in the past.

During the Blitz in WWII, the British government estimated that there were about 50 casualties, of whom about a third were killed and the rest injured, per ton of bombs dropped by the Luftwaffe.

That roughly translates to 15 bombs dropped per death.
Your numbers do not make sense. Do you perhaps mean "thousand" rather than "ton"?
 
Back
Top Bottom