bilby
Fair dinkum thinkum
- Joined
- Mar 6, 2007
- Messages
- 44,080
- Gender
- He/Him
- Basic Beliefs
- Strong Atheist
My favorite question about the ark story is simply "What about all the people who already owned boats? Why didn't any of them survive too?"
From our dear friend GoogleAI Overview
During past warm interglacial periods, global sea levels rose about 3 to 20 meters (10 to 65 feet) higher than they are today
USGS
If all land ice on Earth melts, global sea levels would rise by approximately 65 to 70 meters (about 216 to 230 feet)
Everest 29,000 feet
Mt Hood Oregon 11,000
Mt Rainier Washington14,000
Deepest point the oceans is abut 36,,000 feet. Average depth 12,000 feet. Roughly speaking to cover the Earth with water as high as the highest mountains would take ro0ughly twice the water in the oceans.
Numbers do no add up for Noah's flood.
They had boats, not an ark.My favorite question about the ark story is simply "What about all the people who already owned boats? Why didn't any of them survive too?"
Sure, but Genesis doesn't so much as hint that this is what it claims to have happened; Indeed, it makes very clear that the mountains remained in place, and were covered primarily by water that fell as rain, and possibly also by water added to the sea from "all the fountains of the great deep", which were "broken up".If all the land above sea level were flattened and pushed into the oceans, the entire planet would still be completely submerged under water.
Genesis 7 said:19 And the waters prevailed exceedingly upon the earth; and all the high hills, that were under the whole heaven, were covered.
20 Fifteen cubits upward did the waters prevail; and the mountains were covered.
A rose by any other name would smell as sweet.They had boats, not an ark.My favorite question about the ark story is simply "What about all the people who already owned boats? Why didn't any of them survive too?"
Approx. 370 days from the rain beginning until Noah left the ark. He has a large vessel, presumably well stocked. Had about 90 years to build it. One of the consequences of the ark account is that nobody believed Noah that it would happen.A rose by any other name would smell as sweet.They had boats, not an ark.My favorite question about the ark story is simply "What about all the people who already owned boats? Why didn't any of them survive too?"
Boat, ark, ship, vessel, pontoon, punt, canoe, coracle, kayak, raft... Loads of people had a way to escape from floodwater. Why didn't any of them survive?
I was responding to the comment that says that there is not enough water to cover all the land on earth. There is more than enough water to cover the earth provided certain conditions are met.Sure, but Genesis doesn't so much as hint that this is what it claims to have happened; Indeed, it makes very clear that the mountains remained in place, and were covered primarily by water that fell as rain, and possibly also by water added to the sea from "all the fountains of the great deep", which were "broken up".If all the land above sea level were flattened and pushed into the oceans, the entire planet would still be completely submerged under water.
Genesis 7 said:19 And the waters prevailed exceedingly upon the earth; and all the high hills, that were under the whole heaven, were covered.
20 Fifteen cubits upward did the waters prevail; and the mountains were covered.
The absence of geological evidence for the great flood is stark; Still more stark is the absence of geological evidence for the levelling of the continents and their being pushed into the oceans. Even Genesis doesn't suggest that "all the high hills, that were under the whole heaven, were levelled and pushed into the sea".
Indeed Tigers.I was responding to the comment that says that there is not enough water to cover all the land on earth. There is more than enough water to cover the earth provided certain conditions are met.Sure, but Genesis doesn't so much as hint that this is what it claims to have happened; Indeed, it makes very clear that the mountains remained in place, and were covered primarily by water that fell as rain, and possibly also by water added to the sea from "all the fountains of the great deep", which were "broken up".If all the land above sea level were flattened and pushed into the oceans, the entire planet would still be completely submerged under water.
Genesis 7 said:19 And the waters prevailed exceedingly upon the earth; and all the high hills, that were under the whole heaven, were covered.
20 Fifteen cubits upward did the waters prevail; and the mountains were covered.
The absence of geological evidence for the great flood is stark; Still more stark is the absence of geological evidence for the levelling of the continents and their being pushed into the oceans. Even Genesis doesn't suggest that "all the high hills, that were under the whole heaven, were levelled and pushed into the sea".
Which is an excellent bit of desperate ad-hoc reasoning, right up until somebody points out that a very large proportion of boat owners at the time were fishermen. Like, professional fishermen, who made their livings by catching enough fish to have some to eat, and some left over to trade.Once the rains came and the fountains of the deep broke open there would not have been enough time to have gathered provisions, stocked a vessel for how long? They did not know. I suspect Noah did not know either when it all began.
An atomically perfect sphere would require only a minuscule amount of water to cover it totally. But as that's not the event that we are discussing, why bring it up?I was responding to the comment that says that there is not enough water to cover all the land on earth. There is more than enough water to cover the earth provided certain conditions are met.
Apparently, he'll arrive on a white horse, in a robe covered with blood, and with a double-edged sword coming out of his mouth, with which he will slaughter the armies of darkness. Worst piercing ever -- he won't be pronouncing Methuselah or Beatitudes anytime soon. Will everyone be using ASL around him?We shall all understand when Jesus appears in the clouds, in power and glory, for all the tribes on earth to see and tremble.
Presuming they can find fish to catch in an ocean that has just largely turned into a dead zone due to rapid temperature change.Which is an excellent bit of desperate ad-hoc reasoning, right up until somebody points out that a very large proportion of boat owners at the time were fishermen. Like, professional fishermen, who made their livings by catching enough fish to have some to eat, and some left over to trade.
Fishes don't have the "breath of life", and so were unaffected by the flood, just like plants were.Presuming they can find fish to catch in an ocean that has just largely turned into a dead zone due to rapid temperature change.Which is an excellent bit of desperate ad-hoc reasoning, right up until somebody points out that a very large proportion of boat owners at the time were fishermen. Like, professional fishermen, who made their livings by catching enough fish to have some to eat, and some left over to trade.
Genesis 7 said:21 And all flesh died that moved upon the earth, both of fowl, and of cattle, and of beast, and of every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth, and every man:
22 All in whose nostrils was the breath of life, of all that was in the dry land, died.
23 And every living substance was destroyed which was upon the face of the ground, both man, and cattle, and the creeping things, and the fowl of the heaven; and they were destroyed from the earth: and Noah only remained alive, and they that were with him in the ark.
No it doesn't:Indeed Tigers.
If we go by the current geological evidence.
It seems your analysis is quite correct.
the collision of tectonic plates formed the mountains.
the rapid rise of the mountain chain from the sea floor over the last 15 to 20 million years.
uplift from tectonic activity.
Your own source says that the mountains rose out of the sea, due to tectonic activity, over millions of years.2.7-million-year-old
Fossils of tropical plants and animals are found at the poles because those regions were once near the equator and lived in warm, tropical climates, later moving to polar positions due to continental drift and global climate change
Cretaceous polar forests were temperate forests that grew at polar latitudes towards the end of the Mesozoic Era, known as the Cretaceous Period (145–66 Ma).[1] At this time, global average temperature was about 10 °C (18 °F) higher and carbon dioxide (CO2) levels were around 1000 parts per million (ppm), 2.5 times the current concentration in Earth's atmosphere.[2] High atmospheric carbon dioxide is one of the main causes of a pronounced greenhouse Earth in the Cretaceous, with a low global temperature gradient. This means that high latitudes in both hemispheres were much warmer than they are now, and the Earth lacked ice caps.[2]
The sudden addition of an entire extra ocean atop their usual habitat would not be good for the fishies.Fishes don't have the "breath of life", and so were unaffected by the flood, just like plants were.Presuming they can find fish to catch in an ocean that has just largely turned into a dead zone due to rapid temperature change.Which is an excellent bit of desperate ad-hoc reasoning, right up until somebody points out that a very large proportion of boat owners at the time were fishermen. Like, professional fishermen, who made their livings by catching enough fish to have some to eat, and some left over to trade.
Genesis 7 said:21 And all flesh died that moved upon the earth, both of fowl, and of cattle, and of beast, and of every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth, and every man:
22 All in whose nostrils was the breath of life, of all that was in the dry land, died.
23 And every living substance was destroyed which was upon the face of the ground, both man, and cattle, and the creeping things, and the fowl of the heaven; and they were destroyed from the earth: and Noah only remained alive, and they that were with him in the ark.
Nah. They just swam up to their habituated depth.The sudden addition of an entire extra ocean atop their usual habitat would not be good for the fishies.
Apparently the ark was much smaller (10 meters) than recorded in the Narrative of the Great Flood.article said:The wreck is close to the shore of Kekova Island in Antalya, Turkey. The artefacts lie scattered across an underwater slope, just 30m beneath the waves.
Three large stone anchors were found, as well as more than 30 ceramic storage pots, called amphorae.
The fact that none of the ship's wood remained meant techniques like radiocarbon dating - which measures a form of carbon in organic materials - could not be used to determine its age.
Instead, archaeologists analysed the shape of the amphorae. Because pottery styles have changed over time, different styles are linked to particular periods.