Nah, I am not interested in the "respect" of morons who accuse me of antisemitism. Particularly when they offer advice on regaining respect while doubling down on that absurd slander.
Nonsense. But I understand why you think the party that killed magnitudes more civilians, attacked multiple countries, and has publicly called for ethnic cleansing of Gaza (and the West Bank) is not the larger aggressor.The inclusion of the salient facts thatIt’s not hard to follow, I just think it’s short sighted.It amazes me how long this idiocy has gone on.
To those reprobates here who condemn people here as being anti-Semitic, I’d say:
No one here is anti-Semitic.
We just don’t want Jews to do to others, what was evilly done to them.
Hard to follow?
Look, Israel’s very recent behavior has been very aggressive. So has Ukraine’s.
Both Israel and Ukraine have exacted considerable casualties against an aggressor who initiated a conflict, killing far more of the aggressor than they themselves have lost.
Both have general support from the US, because both are in conflict with entities that are hostile toward the US (and all of Western Europe in general).
The notable difference is that Israel has historically taken a fairly restrained approach toward an entity that has been consistently attacking and trying to kill them for over half a century, and who has the stated desire to eradicate all Israelis.
The disparate response of otherwise rational people to these situations is baffling. Israel has been being accused of genocide since the day after they were brutally attacked. But Ukraine has been viewed as a victim almost universally. Israel is condemned and vilified for taking territory from their opponent, but Ukraine gets viewed as doing so fairly.
1) Ukraine was invaded by a much larger aggressor,
2) the bulk of Ukraine’s violence has been against the invaders,
3) Ukraine is suffering daily attacks on civilians and civilian infrastructure while Israel is not, and
4)much of Israel’s violence was on civilians not invaders,
renders your analysis as blatant propaganda.
1) Israel is surrounded by a billion Muslims. All of which (at least officially) want to see Israel destroyed. Exactly how is Israel the larger agressor?
Wait a second! Europe had been fighting in wars that escalated in brutality (Proto-WWI, WWI, WWII) to less than one hundred years ago! It took the near annihilation of Europe to become the "benefactors of that culture". So shove that culture shit back down. Europe needed the US to create and then recreate an organization aimed at hitting the brakes on massive wars.
Entity? You sound as if all Gazans were responsible for the attack while being targeted for retribution.
Cite?
WTAF??? What territory has Ukraine taken from Russia.
Israeli settlers aren't supposed to be there at all by law. And yes, settler violence has become very deadly. Apparently you do not follow the actual news but still continue to pontificate.
Silly Blather.
They didn't manage to keep it, but they took IIRC about 1000 km of territory last year in Kursk, within Russian lines. That's largely why North Korea sent their soldiers to help. Although from what I've heard, most of the NK troops spent their time fapping to internet porn. That could be rumor thoughWTAF??? What territory has Ukraine taken from Russia.
It’s not hard to follow, I just think it’s short sighted.It amazes me how long this idiocy has gone on.
To those reprobates here who condemn people here as being anti-Semitic, I’d say:
No one here is anti-Semitic.
We just don’t want Jews to do to others, what was evilly done to them.
Hard to follow?
Look, Israel’s very recent behavior has been very aggressive. So has Ukraine’s.
Both Israel and Ukraine have exacted considerable casualties against an aggressor who initiated a conflict, killing far more of the aggressor than they themselves have lost.
Both have general support from the US, because both are in conflict with entities that are hostile toward the US (and all of Western Europe in general).
The notable difference is that Israel has historically taken a fairly restrained approach toward an entity that has been consistently attacking and trying to kill them for over half a century, and who has the stated desire to eradicate all Israelis.
The disparate response of otherwise rational people to these situations is baffling. Israel has been being accused of genocide since the day after they were brutally attacked. But Ukraine has been viewed as a victim almost universally. Israel is condemned and vilified for taking territory from their opponent, but Ukraine gets viewed as doing so fairly.
As a simplified generalization, Ukraine gets viewed as the victimized underdog who is fighting back against a bully.
You guys remember some years ago there was a video of a kid who was being picked on, who snapped and picked up the bully and threw him down on his head? That kid had been consistently bullied for months before he fought back, but there was a huge outpouring of concern for the bully and criticism of the victim who fought back.
So far as I can see, that’s how Israel is being treated. They’re being vilified for successfully fighting back against an entity that has been persistently attacking them for 50+ years.
My overall conclusion is that propaganda works. Iran (who unquestionably supports and backs has) is 100% known to have a highly active propaganda arm. China too. Russia not so much. It’s there, but it’s more often used against their own people and to periodically attempt to sway opinion about US politicians (which a whole lot of other countries also do).
Ukraine still holds about 100 square km of the Kursk territory.They didn't manage to keep it, but they took IIRC about 1000 km of territory last year in Kursk, within Russian lines. That's largely why North Korea sent their soldiers to help. Although from what I've heard, most of the NK troops spent their time fapping to internet porn. That could be rumor thoughWTAF??? What territory has Ukraine taken from Russia.
I seem to remember that FDR committed the US to war against Japan based upon a single terror attack.
If you ignore the Hamas 7th Oct attack then you might be correct.
That's extremely simplistic, even if we grant you licence to describe Pearl Harbor as a "terrorist" attack, which is stretching the definition to breaking point.