• Welcome to the new Internet Infidels Discussion Board, formerly Talk Freethought.

A day without stupid?


Well yes, that's because unlike you stupid libtards, Trump is a genius who knows that Russia is the nation that shares our American values of voluntarily submitting to Putin, whereas the Europeans are ideologically opposed to us in that they want to have sovereignty over their own nations.

How can you trust any of those Europeans? Their cops hardly ever murder civilians and they think toddler concentration camps are immoral. That's why Europe was taken over by Muslims and the entire continent is now a Islamocommunofascist no-go zone! [/conservativesandorlibertarianswhojusthappentobothusethesameargumentstotakethesamepositionsonmuslimnogozonesfornoapparentreason]
 
link
Trump with buddy Putin said:
I hold both countries responsible. I think that the United States has been foolish. We’ve all been foolish. We should have frankly had this dialogue a long time ago. I think that we're all to blame. I think that the United States has now stepped forward along with Russia.
Yes, why didn't anyone else think of this?
 

Maybe they could get their hats from Europe?

39569.jpg
 
Trump supposedly asked Putin if he hacked the election. Putin said 'no', so Trump takes him at his word. Where have I heard that before??? Oh yea:

[YOUTUBE]https://youtu.be/UPb8ZjebUP8[/YOUTUBE]
 
Aw crap. We forgot to use a "both sides" argument.

[rightist] Uh, libtards are exactly as bad because Obama put mustard on a hamburger that one time! Also, apology tour! [/rightist]
 
President Iselin Tweet said:
While I had a great meeting with NATO, raising vast amounts of money, I had an even better meeting with Vladimir Putin of Russia. Sadly, it is not being reported that way - the Fake News is going Crazy!
link

1) He didn't raise any money.
2) The meeting with NATO went poorly.
3) Clearly the meeting in Finland went very well for Putin.
4) Whine about "Fake News".

This man must go. His interpreter is getting debriefed, but obviously Putin would know that, so the question is how well Putin can hide threats.
 
With regards to Putin wanting to talk to former US Ambassador to Russia:
Sarah Sanders said:
It is a proposal that was made in sincerity by President Putin, but President Trump disagrees with it. Hopefully President Putin will have the 12 identified Russians come to the United States to prove their innocence or guilt.
Wonderful... only took a day to say Trump is against feeding a US diplomat to the KGB. And, uh... yeah... Putin will pass those 12 up, not doubt there.
 
http://thehill.com/policy/internati...s-made-in-china-could-be-hit-by-trump-tariffs

article said:
Banners made in China for President Trump's reelection campaign could be hit by the president's own tariffs, according to Reuters.

The news agency reported on Wednesday that “Keep America Great!” banners and "Trump 2020" flags may be among the many products hit with punitive tariffs as part of Trump's trade dispute with China.

Buwahahahahahahahahahahahaha *gasp* hahahahahahahahahahahahaha!

hqdefault.jpg


Once again, Trump is outsmarting everyone by playing 47th-dimensional chess while everyone else is playing checkers! So much winning! MAGA!
 
Gaslighting example:

Recently remembered this scene from a '67 Walter Matthau movie "A Guide for the Married Man", where a friend is giving him advice on how to have an affair. Thought this was a good example of gaslighting

[YOUTUBE]https://youtu.be/yN2gU0XU5FU[/YOUTUBE]
 
With regards to Putin wanting to talk to former US Ambassador to Russia:
Sarah Sanders said:
It is a proposal that was made in sincerity by President Putin, but President Trump disagrees with it. Hopefully President Putin will have the 12 identified Russians come to the United States to prove their innocence or guilt.
Wonderful... only took a day to say Trump is against feeding a US diplomat to the KGB. And, uh... yeah... Putin will pass those 12 up, not doubt there.

Grovel McTreasonpants changed his mind[ent]hellip[/ent] for now. I'm sure he'll turn the ambassador over to his Russian bosses the moment he thinks the public forgot about this.
 
Giuliani, set phasors to 'stun the Fox Hosts'.

article said:
Giuliani later added: “Second, there was another meeting that has been leaked but hasn’t been in public yet,” he continued. “That was a meeting ― an alleged meeting ― three days before, according to Cohen ... he says there was a meeting with Donald Jr., with Jared Kushner, with Paul Manafort, with Gates and possibly two others, in which they ― out of the presence of the president ― discussed the meeting with the Russians. ... That meeting never, ever took place. It didn’t happen. It’s a figment of his imagination.”

...

“Why are you saying that the president wasn’t at the meeting?” Francis asked. “Who asked if he was there? No one asked if he was there.”

“Cohen is alleging the meeting took place,” Giuliani responded. “We’re making it clear the president wasn’t at that meeting. Cohen doesn’t even allege that. To cut it off.”
I'm going to requote that with emphasis... desperately needed emphasis.

article said:
Giuliani later added: “Second, there was another meeting that has been leaked but hasn’t been in public yet,” he continued. “That was a meeting ― an alleged meeting ― three days before, according to Cohen ... he says there was a meeting with Donald Jr., with Jared Kushner, with Paul Manafort, with Gates and possibly two others, in which they ― out of the presence of the president ― discussed the meeting with the Russians. ... That meeting never, ever took place. It didn’t happen. It’s a figment of his imagination.”

...

“Why are you saying that the president wasn’t at the meeting?” Francis asked. “Who asked if he was there? No one asked if he was there.”

“Cohen is alleging the meeting took place,” Giuliani responded. “We’re making it clear the president wasn’t at that meeting. Cohen doesn’t even allege that. To cut it off.”
link
 
Though I would nominally agree with the below idea (just like I would be for indexing the minimum wage to inflation), I would certainly not agree at the current tax rate. So like last year's tax cut for the upper 10% wasn't enough, and deficits aren't getting bad enough...
https://heisenbergreport.com/2018/0...r-the-wealthy-without-congressional-approval/
According to The New York Times, this administration is actually considering using executive authority to deliver what amounts to an across-the-board tax cut for the wealthy. To wit, from an article out Monday evening:
The Trump administration is considering bypassing Congress to grant a $100 billion tax cut mainly to the wealthy, a legally tenuous maneuver that would cut capital gains taxation and fulfill a long-held ambition of many investors and conservatives.

[…]

The Treasury Department could change the definition of “cost” for calculating capital gains, allowing taxpayers to adjust the initial value of an asset, such as a home or a share of stock, for inflation when it sells.

Currently, capital gains taxes are determined by subtracting the original price of an asset from the price at which it was sold and taxing the difference, usually at 20 percent. If a high earner spent $100,000 on stock in 1980, then sold it for $1 million today, she would owe taxes on $900,000. But if her original purchase price was adjusted for inflation, it would be about $300,000, reducing her taxable “gain” to $700,000. That would save the investor $40,000.
The article also notes that the elder Pres. Bush looked into the idea and decided it would be illegal w/o a Congressional bill...
 
So we can index capital gains to inflation, because that's only fair. But we can't index minimum wage to inflation, because that would be too expensive.
 
Stupid Of The Day (yesterday)

“He did not participate in any meeting about the Russia transaction ... the president did not,”
-Rudy G

"Russia transaction"? So it was a transaction? Who gave what to whom, and for what in return? Rudy is the least coherent spokesperson since the venerable Spicey.
 
Stupid Of The Day (yesterday)

“He did not participate in any meeting about the Russia transaction ... the president did not,”
-Rudy G

"Russia transaction"? So it was a transaction? Who gave what to whom, and for what in return? Rudy is the least coherent spokesperson since the venerable Spicey.
link

My fellow Alumni *sigh* said:
He did not participate in any meeting about the Russia transaction ... the president did not. And the other people at the meeting that [Cohen] claims he had without the president about it say he was never there.
To conclude, The President does not know where the bodies are, he didn't facilitate the chemical weapon that killed that woman in England, and Putin does not control the White House.
 
Back
Top Bottom