It need not work any better than it did for Trump in his 3 million vote loss/victory in 2016. They cheat.
It looks like you believe racism is so over. Apparently you have not seen the attacks on Harris' and Vance's wife.
Consolidating power under the executive branch
Nobody is saying that. On the other hand, accusing somebody of "racism" is very overused as a thought- terminating cliché these days.
Harris and Vance have the same wife? Are they a thruple? I thought Kamala was married to a dude.
Hi. No I don't think black people should only worry about race but I think they would be wise to factor it in their considerations. The conservative whites are thinking Trump may get segregation reintroduced and thus save the schools where I live. Such is crazy talk but it is out there. Many want the clocks rolled back.
Then you have not been looking.
Like, the GOP is outright saying she is "DEI", which is pretty fucking racist considering she is a competent criminal prosecutor who won election to the senate.
Can you elaborate on what views I hold that you consider very conservative? Is it my view that all education, including pre-school and post-secondary school (including trade schools) should be considered a public good and funded via taxes? Or perhaps it's my view that the deliver of health care in the US should be treated as a public utility, disallowing competition and ensuring that resources are apportioned to meet social needs rather than profit margins? Or is it my view that UBI is a terrible idea because it doesn't address the root causes of poverty, and that it would be much more reasonable to increase funding for education, day care, and nutritional support across the board, as well as address the cost of housing somehow, even though I don't currently have any idea how that should be done? Is that what makes you think that I'm economically very conservative and out of touch?
What bothers me is that the entire approach here is premised on the idea that black and hispanic people only give a shit about skin color, therefore they need to have a candidate with a similar melanin content or they won't vote for your party. Similarly, there's the premise that female humans only give a fuck about sex, so if you don't pander to us with a female candidate we won't vote for your party.
JFC, or the last decade, the only time I run across blatant racial and sexist epithets, they're coming from self-congratulatory progressives.
my experience leads me to conclude one of two things is true: 1) you are clueless about these epithets or 2) you live a very sheltered life.
No, not over, not completely. But up until about the past twenty years, it had diminished massively, to a point where it was no longer a material driver of views. Within the last couple of decades, it's become a hyperfocus for progressives, who see race in everything and who insist that every single topic must be viewed through a racial lense. Progressives have reified race.
You're going to need to be more specific. I've seen insinuations from progressives that any objection to Harris is racially motivated and cannot be anything else. And I've seen commentary from progressives about how Vance won't be accepted by republicans because she's Indian and that this will hurt Vance. Now, I don't frequent stormfront (is that even still around), so it's entirely possible I'm missing something... but I haven't actually seen anything from conservatives or republicans that focus on the race or ethnicity of either Harris or Vance's wife.
Por que no los dos?
