• Welcome to the new Internet Infidels Discussion Board, formerly Talk Freethought.

A day without stupid?

They set up a hotel conference room to look like they had sworn in expert witnesses testifying before a panel of officials. They cosplayed a congressional hearing.
 
blastula said:
They set up a hotel conference room to look like they had sworn in expert witnesses testifying before a panel of officials. They cosplayed a congressional hearing.
Click to expand...

Only thing that would make it better is a hotel concierge showing up and asking if everything is alright, if they need more refreshments or beverages, and that Airport Hilton appreciates their business.
 
crazyfingers said:
Does anyone know the context behind the crazy claim of 600K to 2.3K? Like who made shat shit up?
Click to expand...

Both politifact and statesman.com rate the claim as false ('pants on fire' on the latter), and, while noting that Guiliani's office did not respond to repeated requests to show backup for the claim, both sites note that 600,000 is approximately the combined total of mail-in votes in Philadelphia and Pittsburgh. (Sigh.) Expect to hear this 600,000 trope from jackholes in bars (or in my case coffee houses) for the next eternity.
 
I don't know what to call her...former Trump lawyer? Trump surrogate? Fangirl?

Anyway, Sydney Powell released the Kraken...without running spell-check first:

https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/527679-ex-trump-lawyer-sidney-powell-files-typo-filled-lawsuits-in-michigan


Sidney Powell, the lawyer recently distanced from the Trump campaign, on Wednesday filed typo-filled lawsuits in both Michigan and Georgia alleging election fraud.

The case in Michigan had a number of formatting problems that removed spacing between words, Bloomberg reports. In the Georgia suit, the word district was misspelled twice on the first page of the document. There was an extra c for “DISTRICCT,” and then it was spelled “DISTRCOICT.”
Click to expand...
 
[TWEET]<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Today <a href="https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@realDonaldTrump</a> wandered out of his own office and left Medal of Freedom recipient, Dan Gable, standing there with no clue what to do. <br><br>"More Presidential than anyone in history." <a href="https://t.co/S5b2FLPWoZ">pic.twitter.com/S5b2FLPWoZ</a></p>— KevinlyFather ???????????????????????????????????????????????? (@KevinlyFather) <a href="https://twitter.com/KevinlyFather/status/1336099660314755072?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">December 8, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>[/TWEET]..
 
From a thread on Facebook about all the stupid shit trump supporters say and do to "own teh libs."

"I'm gonna shit my pants next time I hang out with my liberal cousin! That way he's the idiot hanging out with the guy who shit his pants!"
-JRA

There was mention, of course, about the lady who went to a trumpy "protest" or rally or whatever wearing a mask with a giant dick sticking out of it. I've never felt so owned. I was ashamed to show my face in public after that random lady I've never met owned me by wearing a giant dildo on her face.
 
ZiprHead said:
[TWEET]<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Today <a href="https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@realDonaldTrump</a> wandered out of his own office and left Medal of Freedom recipient, Dan Gable, standing there with no clue what to do. <br><br>"More Presidential than anyone in history." <a href="https://t.co/S5b2FLPWoZ">pic.twitter.com/S5b2FLPWoZ</a></p>— KevinlyFather ������������������������������������������������ (@KevinlyFather) <a href="https://twitter.com/KevinlyFather/status/1336099660314755072?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">December 8, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>[/TWEET]..
Click to expand...

Welcome to episode #4,568 of "Imagine if Obama did this".
 
Kayleigh McEnamy gives us this gem.
[TWEET]https://twitter.com/kayleighmcenany/status/1336472374036881408[/TWEET]
Kayleigh McEnamy said:
Chances of him winning collectively is “one in a quadrillion to the 4th power”
Click to expand...
When footnotes are mistaken for math.

Thanks goodness it didn't say 1,000,000,000,000,0004!, not that she'd know what a factorial was.

Almost Kayleigh McEnamy said:
Chances of him winning collectively is “one in a quadrillion to the 4th power factorial", which totally makes my calculator report a ERR, so that number doesn't even exist!
Click to expand...
 
Jimmy Higgins said:
Kayleigh McEnamy gives us this gem.
[TWEET]https://twitter.com/kayleighmcenany/status/1336472374036881408[/TWEET]
Kayleigh McEnamy said:
Chances of him winning collectively is “one in a quadrillion to the 4th power”
Click to expand...
When footnotes are mistaken for math.

Thanks goodness it didn't say 1,000,000,000,000,0004!, not that she'd know what a factorial was.

Almost Kayleigh McEnamy said:
Chances of him winning collectively is “one in a quadrillion to the 4th power factorial", which totally makes my calculator report a ERR, so that number doesn't even exist!
Click to expand...
Click to expand...

Ok we already knew that she's a moron. Is that document what Texas filed with the supreme court? They are really claiming that they have data to demonstrate that probability? I can't imagine that any probability estimate could stand up to the facts and any analysis of what actually happened. I can't wait to see if the supreme court does more than simply unanimously reject the suit.
 
crazyfingers said:
Ok we already knew that she's a moron. Is that document what Texas filed with the supreme court? They are really claiming that they have data to demonstrate that probability? I can't imagine that any probability estimate could stand up to the facts and any analysis of what actually happened. I can't wait to see if the supreme court does more than simply unanimously reject the suit.
Click to expand...
I would be so tempted to own these juvenile dickheads. It's good I'm not a judge.
 
crazyfingers said:
Ok we already knew that she's a moron. Is that document what Texas filed with the supreme court? They are really claiming that they have data to demonstrate that probability? I can't imagine that any probability estimate could stand up to the facts and any analysis of what actually happened. I can't wait to see if the supreme court does more than simply unanimously reject the suit.
Click to expand...
Yeah, the Texas lawsuit is claiming that. I'm sure if you multiply enough fractions together, you can get to 1 in a quadrillion. But it will need to ignore sound statistics, reality, and maybe even a bit of math... as well as a including a massive heaping of willful ignorance.

The math is footnoted, so I'm curious what is in the source and am trying to find it. I think you have a better chance at getting two royal flushes in the first five cards of draw poker than Biden winning the election, according to them.

I found this which discusses it. Worse than it seems on its surface.
link said:
Second, the binomial distribution makes no sense here. This corresponds to a model in which voters are independently flipping coins (approximately; not quite coin flips because the probability isn’t quite 50%) to decide how to vote. That’s not how voting works. Actually, most voters know well ahead of time who they will be voting for. So even if you wanted to test the null hypothesis of no change (which, as my correspondent noted above, you don’t), this would be the wrong model to use.
Click to expand...
This is what I figured, they were treating individual votes like random events.
 
Jimmy Higgins said:
[This is what I figured, they were treating individual votes like random events.
Click to expand...

Amazing. And the lawyers who made this argument are not at risk of being disbarred?

Everyone who knows anything about it knows what happened. Mostly democrats voted by mail and most of the mail-in votes were counted last. What happened is not rocket science.

Biden's come back after the in-person votes were counted was predicted way beforehand.
 
crazyfingers said:
Jimmy Higgins said:
[This is what I figured, they were treating individual votes like random events.
Click to expand...

Amazing. And the lawyers who made this argument are not at risk of being disbarred?

Everyone who knows anything about it knows what happened. Mostly democrats voted by mail and most of the mail-in votes were counted last. What happened is not rocket science.

Biden's come back after the in-person votes were counted was predicted way beforehand.
Click to expand...
This seems less a hail mary and more a bullshit pretense to steal the election from the Electoral College.

See, we told you there was fraud. This case had 17 State AG's enjoin with it. That alone proves we need an investigation! It is a fraud bounded by circular logic.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom