No, it does not require a damn thing - it sets an aspirational goal. There is no plenty for missing the timetable. Your criticism is based on misinformation or worse.I have no problem with research. Attempting to set an implementation timeframe that's impossible even if the tech was already on the shelf isn't reasonable.
Her proposal requires developing a new energy storage technology, testing it and deploying it on a massive scale in 12 years. That simply isn't going to happen. She seems to think 9 women can produce a baby in a month.
And you're still missing the fact that giving people an obviously impossible goal is not the path to get them to do their best to accomplish it. People don't go the extra mile when they know it doesn't matter.