Toni
Contributor
- Joined
- Aug 10, 2011
- Messages
- 19,838
- Basic Beliefs
- Peace on Earth, goodwill towards all
Some ranchers would disagree with you,No one needs an AR or an AK to defend themselves from wildlife.Private arms ownership was also considered a given in any rural or frontier town, not necessarily as protection against Indians but as an essential means of obtaining food--and as a defense against some of the more dangerous wildlife.
And they are still felt necessary by some homeowners in rural areas. However, that right has nothing to do with militias.
For One Colorado Rancher, An AR-15 Is A Tool To Protect His Herd
When you look at a gun, what do you see? To better understand why the topic of guns is so polarizing, we spent time with a Colorado rancher and his family.
gunsandamerica.org
Personally, I’m not fond of guns, although I grew up with hunters in the family and in my younger days, handled my dad’s guns. I chose not to hunt. A number of very close family members have been held up at gun point. Usually in their own homes, two of which were farm houses. One was shot at with his own firearm that he kept for hunting and occasionally reducing the groundhog population in the cow pasture or going after a very persistent fox. None of these were AK or AR but there was no need to be concerned about wolves or even coyotes much less bears.