Jimmy Higgins
Contributor
- Joined
- Jan 31, 2001
- Messages
- 46,935
- Basic Beliefs
- Calvinistic Atheist
A Tale of Juxtaposition?
So we have this Business Insider article which appears to link a hard drive that was subpoenaed by the FBI... and was able to link it to an FBI agent that specializations in child porn cases. So this shop was restoring data on some hard drive, found some stuff (the Isaac guy says he didn't find anything like this on "Hunter Biden's" drive) and reported it to the FBI. The FBI then took it and was making a case against whomever was the owner.
Regarding the hard drive, I came upon a ravine and I am wondering and curious if other people have noticed... that the only things that are being leaked from the Hard Drive are emails and photos? Last time I checked, I had a lot more on my computer than emails and photos. Spreadsheets, word docs, games, etc... The word docs are often the source of incriminating information for people that are trying to make illegal money off Ukraine or China. Yet, it is emails and photos. And the photos? Typically phone related shots, not a real camera... that you'd plug into a computer and download the images.
So we one hard drive that does exist and the FBI does have it. But if Giuliani has a copy of it, why have they released no other types of documents (the ones that usually have the incrimination)? They've only released documents that could have been lifted from a discarded or compromised cell phone? The release of the photos has struck me as being trite (embarrassing mostly), but upon further thought, the photos almost seem like a cover. A sort of... we have to have a "hard drive" because how else would we have these photos... and therefore the emails are legit, both in source and content.
So, at least based on the shoddy evidence supplied, is it possible Giuliani is using the subpoena for a real hard drive with absolutely no connection to Hunter Biden in juxtaposition with photos and emails of dubious sourcing and content from a discarded or compromised cell phone that belongs to Hunter Biden. I would hedge to compromised as they could just present a discarded phone as evidence because 'hey, it was discarded'.
So we have this Business Insider article which appears to link a hard drive that was subpoenaed by the FBI... and was able to link it to an FBI agent that specializations in child porn cases. So this shop was restoring data on some hard drive, found some stuff (the Isaac guy says he didn't find anything like this on "Hunter Biden's" drive) and reported it to the FBI. The FBI then took it and was making a case against whomever was the owner.
Regarding the hard drive, I came upon a ravine and I am wondering and curious if other people have noticed... that the only things that are being leaked from the Hard Drive are emails and photos? Last time I checked, I had a lot more on my computer than emails and photos. Spreadsheets, word docs, games, etc... The word docs are often the source of incriminating information for people that are trying to make illegal money off Ukraine or China. Yet, it is emails and photos. And the photos? Typically phone related shots, not a real camera... that you'd plug into a computer and download the images.
So we one hard drive that does exist and the FBI does have it. But if Giuliani has a copy of it, why have they released no other types of documents (the ones that usually have the incrimination)? They've only released documents that could have been lifted from a discarded or compromised cell phone? The release of the photos has struck me as being trite (embarrassing mostly), but upon further thought, the photos almost seem like a cover. A sort of... we have to have a "hard drive" because how else would we have these photos... and therefore the emails are legit, both in source and content.
So, at least based on the shoddy evidence supplied, is it possible Giuliani is using the subpoena for a real hard drive with absolutely no connection to Hunter Biden in juxtaposition with photos and emails of dubious sourcing and content from a discarded or compromised cell phone that belongs to Hunter Biden. I would hedge to compromised as they could just present a discarded phone as evidence because 'hey, it was discarded'.