Derec
Contributor
As long as you don't capitalize it, yes...So you actually think black lives matter.
As long as you don't capitalize it, yes...So you actually think black lives matter.
As long as you don't capitalize it, yes...So you actually think black lives matter.
It is intellectually dishonest to quote mine. Your response failed to address the actual content of my post which wasI have consistently posted against groups like #BLM. I do not deny it. They are a utterly despicable (not to say deplorable) movement.
Nothing dishonest about what I posted. I never claimed that DuBois and Washington referred to #BLM in these quotes. That would be dishonest. What they were referring to are conditions in their own day, and these are obviously not "completely different" matters to the conditions of today. While there are significant differences, there are also fundamental similarities, and what's more the developments since they were alive make what they said in these quotes much more applicable, not less.
If they were frustrated by the racial grievance industry and whining in their own day, how much more would they be frustrated in today's America, where a biracial man just completed two terms as president for example?
Speak for yourself!And transparent idiocy.
P.S.: I hope that you have at least learned something about apostrophes.
Repeated assertion does not make a stupid remark any less stupid.Thanks for providing additional evidence to support Tom Sawyer's observation.
Funny.I was deliberately missing the point to make another one.Wow. How did you think to look to Wiki for a definition, rather than a dictionary?
The long and consistent posting history of any single poster is certainly more telling than the actions of an amorphous group. So, it is intellectually dishonest for you to simultaneously claim that unter (or anyone else) can know nothing about you and your "ilk" while expecting to be taken seriously about knowing about #BLM and its "ilk".No it wasn't! You know nothing about me and my "ilk".
A little. What do you know about them that would lead you to believe that they would be approving of the #BLM movement?
First of all, the issue is not "unarmed". I am sure both of them are intelligent enough to realize that merely being unarmed does not make one not a threat, or the shooting unjustified.
Second, I think we can all agree that unjustified police killings are unacceptable, regardless of race. That is the chief problem with #BLM:
- they conflate justified and unjustified police killings, often calling perfectly justified killings "murder' and have protested against police killings even where the decedent was arfmed, such as Sylville Smith, Quanice Hayes or Keith L. Scott.
- they are susceptible to ridiculous conspiracy theories. For example when Sandra Bland, who had a history of mental health issues, took her own life in jail, #BLMers were quick claiming she was murdered and that the suicide was staged. When a black gay man committed suicide at Atlanta's Piedmont Park, #BLM claimed he was "lynched" by the KKK and they even invented stories that KKK was holding a rally at Piedmont Park that week. Similar claims were made when 18 year old Ben Keita was found hanged in Washington State, even though there is no evidence of foul play.
- they focus solely on blacks who have been killed by police, forgetting that people of all races have been killed by police under questionable circumstances. This is not uniquely a black issue.
- on the other hand, they ignore the much larger problem of blacks being killed by criminals, most of them black.
- many #BLM protests have degenerated into violent riots characterized by arson, looting etc. Others have led to blocking highways.
For example, #BLM movement pretty much ignored the killing of an elderly man on Facebook live because the killer was neither a police officer nor a white (or off-white like Z) civilian.
All of this is ignored when you simplistically reduce #BLM to "not approve the killing of unarmed black men". And all of these would provide plenty of reasons to reject the movement as harmful.
Derec, here's some advice.
Don't quote people you don't know or know little about
Makes you look ignorant.
Derec, here's some advice.
Don't quote people you don't know or know little about
Makes you look ignorant.
Nice job of avoiding addressing his point.
Derec, here's some advice.
Don't quote people you don't know or know little about
Makes you look ignorant.
Nice job of avoiding addressing his point.
No, I really do have a point, and if you'd actually bothered to read my posts, you might have gotten it.He didn't really have a point beyond "I found some quotes from black people, and I think they would have not liked Black Lives Matter."
Wrong. There is plenty of things that invalidate #BLM as a whole without it.This is basically the point of the very flawed OP...assuming that since you found a black person critical of BLM, that somehow invalidates BLM as a whole.
The "select black people" are two of the most prominent black intellectuals in history. Also, I do not see how I have taken what they have said "out of context". What context do you think there is that makes their words mean something different? Or are you just throwing "out of context" allegation out haphazardly?Derec - like the OP - assigned an out-sized level of credibility to the worlds of select black people taken out of context.
She still called for black people to start killing white people. Clinton was right to call her out in it. And since when does somebody have to be "voice of x America" for them to be criticized for saying something outrageous?This is not terribly new. Remember Sister Souljah in the 90s? You'd have thought she was the voice of black America by the media coverage, but she wasn't.
Ok, so the rapper was misiconed. Big deal.In this thread a rapper who has had some successful mixtapes and an album that charted is suddenly a "black icon."
Makes him more discerning than the #BLM fanboys and girls."See, even this rapper with prison tattoos and a criminal record thinks BLM is bad!"
I never said anything even remotely approaching that. Your statement is really libelous.Then Derec jumps in with his "every black person is a thug" routine and it all goes to shit.
LMAO!It doesn't help that groups like black like BLM, for example, are often more effective at preventing riots than the police, who if anything sometimes outright instigate them by overacting wildly to next to nothing (as in Ferguson and Baltimore).
You are pretending that these were "peaceful protests" that only became violent riots because police somehow provoked them into becoming looters, arsonists etc. That is as much a lie as that Michael Brown was a "gentle giant" who "had his hands up" in surrender.If people are just marching or standing around (or leaving high school, as occured in Baltimore), and they come in wearing riot gear or military gear, yes, they're going to piss people off., particularly in they start firing rubber bullets or tear gas wildly.
They engaged in riots, looting and arson from the very beginning.You're attacking them em masse for no reason.
the OP - assigned an out-sized level of credibility to the worlds of select black people taken out of context.
Then Derec jumps in with his "every black person is a thug" routine and it all goes to shit.
You focus on riots that evolve out of protests while ignoring the examples of peaceful BLM protests such asThey engaged in riots, looting and arson from the very beginning.
Ford I've kept a tablet next to the toilet for years. Guess where I hang out while defecating? BLACK TWITTER. I've done it for a while. I see the problem clearly. I watched and learned from millions of people. The problem is in attitude. Attitudes caused by Hip Hop and all that comes with it. Hop Hop must be stopped.
This isn't the best way to bring forth my concerns, because I'm not a good thread maker. I rarely do this, but you'd rather me do this, than invade your thread? Nobody was complaining about BLM yesterday so I took action and made sure that people got to complain about black people. You agree that we should be complaining about black people? Yes, so do I. They are totally scary right now. I don't know how to debate but I'm TELLING you there is something here. Eventually I will put it in a way that you can understand. It is my own fault that you don't get it yet, but I hope you stick with me. I really do care.
Then Derec jumps in with his "every black person is a thug" routine and it all goes to shit.
Not trying to be a dick rider here, but most of your (racial subject) whipping boy's points are valid. I haven't seen Derec say anything racist and I usually agree with whatever Derec has to say about black matters. I may be missing some history, but from up close he seems legit, and "intellectually honest", whatever the hell that means.
Bottom Line: The biggest threat to you and your family is Hip Hop, which doesn't belong to blacks. Hip Hop is an entity that is molded by evil people who are NOT black. It is sad that black people do not understand this. It worries me that you don't understand. You should understand. Why don't you understand, Ford? Is it because I'm not good at debating, or is it that you have to make things more complicated than they need to be?
Some rap stars against BLM, anyone? I'd jump to the next artist but a lot of them are in a stage of ambivalence. When more speak out, the movement will die. Then we can sleep soundly.
"I wasn't a victim of police brutality, I got my ass whooped because I was conducting myself like a nigger with no respect for authority - so I deserved what I got. Now I no longer have those problems because I changed the way I conduct myself". -Kevin Gates.
A few more Kevin Gates is all it will take, so I think it is important to find these people and support them. His music ROCKS btw. Not a gangsta rap fan, but he is NICE!
"Black twitter" is a real thing, especially for black activists.
"Black twitter" is a real thing, especially for black activists.
another1 said:Hop Hop must be stopped.