Exactly how you would think. They don't show up, cops go after them. This isn't rocket science.
If they can find them. And what happens when they are dragged back? The court date has to be rescheduled, so are they held then or released again after they promise to show up this time?
Btw, a nice thing about bail is that if a defendant absconds, i.e. does not show up and cannot be found at last known addresses, recovery of bail money is an incentive for licensed private bounty hunters to find that person and bring them to court.
Okay, I stand corrected. America is so fucking gaga over locking people up they have a plethora of names to justify the process, not just two.
Different things have different names. By the way, I looked it up. You guys also have "prisons" and "remand centers". It's not all "gaol" any more, even in that former prison colony.
I've got a question for you - what percentage of pretrial incarcerated Americans do you think are legitimate dangers to society and should be remanded before trial? Or to put it another way, how many people are currently jailed whilst waiting to be charged with a non-violent crime?
I have not worked out a percentage. I would say less than in most places in the US, but more than in NY post bail deform.
I think it should be up to a judge's discretion based on several variables
- nature of crime, esp. violent vs. non-violent
- strength of evidence against defendant
- defendant's history (criminal history? history of failure to appear? awaiting trial on a different charge? ease of absconding?)
A judge should be able to take those things into account when deciding between
- release on own recognizance
- imposing bail
- releasing on home confinement w electronic monitoring (aka ankle bracelet)
- remand to custody