Emily Lake
Might be a replicant
- Joined
- Jul 7, 2014
- Messages
- 10,199
- Location
- It's a desert out there
- Gender
- Agenderist
- Basic Beliefs
- Atheist
I genuinely can't tell if you're trying to be sarcastically funny or not here, Poli.You hypocrite! How dare you divulge that information about him, while demanding that your government cover up much worse crimes committed by other men?My grandmother's first husband beat the ever loving hell out of her for a year and a half until she divorced him. At the time, it was legal for him to beat the crap out of his wife.
Why is this so challenging for you to grasp? I'm not asking that the government cover up anything - and that's not what's happening. What I object to is the government obligating companies to resurrect evidence of them having done something legal at the time and disclose it to the world. Don't you see that those aren't the same things?
If any company wants to voluntarily dig through their history and disclose that info, by all means they should do so. It's being forced to do so while framing it as a crime that I have a problem with.
The company I work for used to have pre-existing condition exclusions for medical insurance. Pre-ex was legal at the time. We did it and so did pretty much every other company operating before 2010. It's not a mystery, it's not being covered up. It's just not being done anymore. When PPACA passed, my company didn't get embarrassed and try to bury all references to having used pre-ex in our policies. It's illegal now, and if my company were using pre-ex NOW, I'd be hollering from the rooftops about it. But it wasn't illegal then. It's not a crime that the company did something legal that has since become illegal and is no longer done.
You seem determined to miss my points, Poli. I don't know why that is. For example... you snipped my post and turned it into a completely different issue, while ignoring the entire purpose of me having brought it up. Why? Why not actually consider and address the question I asked in the spirit it was asked?
My grandmother's first husband beat the ever loving hell out of her for a year and a half until she divorced him. At the time, it was legal for him to beat the crap out of his wife. What possible good can come from punishing my eldest aunt for what her father did when she was an infant? How does that even make the teensiest bit of sense?