The actual science, the references to which TSwizzle actively ignores, does not have a political orientation.
No I don't ignore "the actual science"
Repeating a false statement over and over doesn't make it true. Can you point to even ONE (1) post of yours which approached the topic scientifically? How often do you cite or excerpt from a peer-reviewed journal article?
Nah, you just don't like it when I point out the obvious flaws in the studies written by activist "scientists" that get presented on here as "science". We've been through this routine numerous times, it is beyond tedious.
I missed it. Sorry. Can you link me to your pointing out obvious flaws? My recollection is that you've written "rapture-like cult" a few dozen times, but little else.
It will be a balmy 70f in Santa Monica later today
Who cares?
Swammi (I couldn't link but see post 2,687.
I was able to link to that post. Do you have me set to IGNORE? I don't know why else you'd be unable to link.
Anyway your assertion is false. I did NOT ask for a report of Santa Monica temperature. Instead . . .
We've not heard from Santa Monica recently. Might I ask our Santa Monican climatologist to drive up the coast a few miles and report on temperatures there?
I specifically asked you to drive UP the coast, AWAY from Santa Monica a few miles and report on conditions THERE. Did I need to CAPITALIZE key-words, as I've done in this rephrasing?
We've not heard from Santa Monica recently.
This was NOT dark humor. Did anyone other than thebeave think I was suggesting, sarcastically or not, that Mr. Swiz was gone forever?
Instead the very next sentence implied I thought Mr. Swiz was reading the thread:
Might I ask our Santa Monican climatologist to drive up the coast a few miles and report on temperatures there?
My guess is its still on the warm side in Santa Monica. Maybe if his city and/or house burns down, he'll stop posting here and we can celebrate his misfortune and our gain with a little party. Making this forum as left as possible is always a plus. Whattaya think?
I think it interesting that you equate "believing in science" with "left."
??? Where did I say that? I didn't say anything about science.
Well, then you'll have to clarify your remark. AFAIK our Santa Monican is noted here particularly for his rejection of science; and you proposed to celebrate his house burning down to make the forum more "left."
Is there some other way that the Santa Monican is "right" that would lead you to celebrate his loss?
My comment was a sarcastic response to your "dark humor" about a possible looming tragedy for TSwizzle. Which I think a lot of people would be fine with, because he doesn't share the same political orientation as themselves.
Confused. You seem to be very confused. WHICH comment by you was sarcastic? Surely not "??? Where did I say that? I didn't say anything about science.", no? An in that case, you have overlooked the query I posed to you, shown above in red. What gives? Can't you follow a train of thought?
I suppose that both thebeave and Mr. Swiz are far too intelligent to actually support Donald Trump. But each of them has been seen to fall for foolish right-wing memes from time to time.
You accuse my ordinary remark of being "dark humor", wishing ill on Mr. Swiz. But YOU came up with that. Then you pretend to forget that Swiz, a least in this thread, continually rejects science, and is well-known for that. When I ask for clarification, you fall back on "sarcasm." Was EVERY sentence by thebeave shown above sarcastic? Or are there charges against Mr. Swiz OTHER than rejecting science, which thebeave thinks are contrary to "left"?
It is just this sort of confused thinking and incompetent logic that led to the disastrous result on November 5th.