You seem to be engaging in a false dichotomy. Sweden, I guess, is a small place relatively. Same with Denmark. The US has 50 states. Between the extremes of "letting it rip" and lockdowns are actually letting it rip in places like Vermont and other states where vaccination rates are high. And that is what the CDC recommendation is, sort of, when they are not advocating for mask wearing of vaccinated in those regions. Now, other states, such as Arkansas have made laws to stop localities from implementing mask-wearing at all. The CDC is recommending in low vaccinated areas like Arkansas that vaccinated people ought to wear masks inside. They haven't said anything about a full-blown lockdown. It's to stop the spread and rise of deaths, new variants, and full hospitals. Who does this save potentially?
- Random people who just get it by coincidence but no longer have a spot in a hospital (or ICU);
- Yes, people who are not vaccinated because they are dumbasses;
- Children who are less than 13 who cannot be vaccinated yet;
- People with immune problems who were vaccinated but get the virus anyway;
- EVERYONE on the planet who could suffer from a newly created variant that is even more resistant to the vaccine than Delta is because you want to eliminate giant petri dishes of virus mutation.
USA has vaccination rates comparable to Europe. I think that any American who really wants to get vaccinated can get vaccinated. Am I wrong?
https://ourworldindata.org/explorer...WE~DNK~IDN&Metric=People+vaccinated+(by+dose)
Yes, you are wrong for two reasons:
1. That isn't completely relevant to the issue.
2. People under 13 cannot get vaccinated.
Zoidberg said:
We're not going to eliminate the giant petri dish of mutation. That's a pipe dream.
You are engaging in a false dichotomy again, this time between completely negligent and completely eliminating something. We can try very hard and therefore significantly mitigate risk which is in between those two extremes. So, for example, Vermont which has near 80% vaccination rate hasn't completely eliminated anything but it _has_ neared herd immunity which is very good. There are basically two things to try here:
1. Try to achieve near herd immunity vaccination rate and then LET IT RIP!
2. If your region cannot achieve near herd immunity, then slow the spread by masking up. This way the probability of the region becoming a hotbed of new mutations and hospitalizations will be significantly reduced. Excess deaths are being avoided.
Zoidberg said:
We have a significant part of the population who are antivaxxers. That's just something we need to work around.
Yes and the way to work around it can be different according to the dynamics of the population, such as not worrying about it as much when you have achieved herd immunity and worrying about it more when you haven't, i.e. and then acting on those concerns by masking up indoors when low vaccination rates.
Zoidberg said:
I was all for lockdowns and strict measures a year ago. I was for it up until about May this year. After that it had diminishing returns.
And that may very well be true for the specific regions you live in or neighboring you. However, there are NOT "diminishing returns" in Arkansas, Alabama, Georgia, or a number of US states where vaccination rates are low and hospitalizations, deaths, cases, ICU bed usages, ventilators are all increasing. Right now, Arkansas has 97% ICU bed usage and it is getting worse. Asking people to mask up indoors is not extreme and will help to reduce the spread in such a hotbed area.
Zoidberg said:
And now I think it's dumb. Now I think we're continuing the strict lockdown strategy out of habit or because of some sunk cost fallacy in operation.
Wasn't the whole point of vaccinations so that we wouldn't need to lockdown?
No, the point of vaccinations are so that we do not have a significant number of excess deaths in society. Places like Vermont (and perhaps regions of Sweden or Denmark) may not need to mask up because they will not experience significant excess deaths due to being vaccinated. But other places will experience significant excess deaths and so putting other things in place while convincing people to get vaccinated makes sense.