Swammerdami
Squadron Leader
...
So Biden orders employees of big businesses to be vaccinated against Covid-19 or face weekly testing.
Completely fair assuming, in this executive order is also included a plan for how to finance it, and organise it in a way that doesn't unnecessarily complicate the lives of unvaccinated. Is there? If there isn't he's a fascist totalitarian bully. If it is, he's a good competent president. It would have been nice if this information was in the article.
Finance it? Aren't vaccines and tests already free? And shouldn't private companies be given their own leeway about how to organize it? I'm not given a subsidy to buy a baby-seat or to wait for signal lights to turn green; WTH do we need "financing" to examine a vaccination certificate?
But I'm not responding to your post to quibble about such trivia. To the contrary, what caught my eye was that, in your view, the difference between a brief order and one which spells out — (what exactly? the need for political commissars assigned to each private company to "organise" a vaccination order?) — is the difference between "a fascist totalitarian bully" and a "good competent" president! A dizzyingly exaggerated distinction, based on little, if anything, of substance!
Not to mention any names ( ), but some poster(s) at TFT habitually plunge from one extremist view to a completely different extremist view with shameless abandon! At some point the posts are useful only for amusement. If faced with a multiple-choice question ("Does this poster sound like (a) a left-winger, (b) a right-winger, (c) a libertarian, or (d) an authoritarian?") I would go with "(e) all of the above."
One addendum I might provide in such an executive order is mandatory jail terms for use of fake vaccine certificates. If failure to regulate commissars would make Biden "a fascist totalitarian bully" I guess my addendum would make me "a card-carrying Islamo-communist Pol Pot-worshiping slave-monger in the worst Trumpo-Clintonist tradition."