barbos
Contributor
AstraZeneca worked in GB, so it must be Chinese.link
Seychelles isn't providing a happy narrative for either the Chinese vaccine and/or AstraZenica.vaccine.
That works to about 50% benefit. Of course, if one of the vaccinations is failing compared to the other, it is much lower than 50%.
"Normal", you mean "not as advertised". There is currently no breakdown on who was vaccinated with what and still got infected.
If there is any silver lining, this is great news for Pfizer, which provided vaccines for Israel.
But Seychelles and WHO need to find out what vaccine isn't working at transmission, because preventing transmissions is crucial! Yes, we save lives short term regardless, if the vaccine mitigates the symptoms, but more people infected means more mutations. So if the vaccine isn't stopping transmission, those with that vaccine need masks still.article said:Scientists say breakthrough infections are normal because no vaccine is 100% effective. But the experience in Seychelles stands in stark contrast to Israel, which has the second-highest vaccination coverage in the world and has managed to beat back the virus. A study has shown that the Pfizer vaccine that Israel used is 94% effective at preventing transmission. On Wednesday, the number of daily new confirmed COVID-19 cases per 1 million people in Seychelles stood at 2,613.38, compared to 5.55 in Israel, according to The World In Data project.
Meanwhile Sputnik V worked well in San Marino.