Of course you think that.
But the facts are clear. Women are at a much higher risk of violence at the hands of men, and women are at a much higher risk of harm from false rumors and women are at a much higher risk of career harm from denigrating interpretations of the exact same behavior that you never bring up about men.
What does violence have to do with these two cases? Nothing. And show me a citation that women's careers are " at a much higher risk of career harm from denigrating interpretations of the exact same behavior" as men?
So when you continuously, repeatedly and falsely claim that women’s bodies are available for transactions without their consent it is harmful to their careers and their safety.
I have never claimed that "women’s bodies are available for transactions without their consent". Whatever makes you think I did? And what does it have to do with Kamala Harris having a consensual, albeit transactional, relationship with a much older man?
It normalizes harm to them it gives men permission to harm women, because you proclaim the equivalent of “they want it anyway”.
The hell it does! I have never said anything to that effect. You are inventing things and claiming I said them.
And when you can’t tell that a (distasteful and false) joke about a man’s sexulity does not set him up as available for sexual transactions, it is blindly deluded. They are not the same.
A "(distasteful and false) joke about a woman’s sexulity[sic]" does not set her up as "available for sexual transactions" either. Neither does saying that she was (most likely) in a transactional relationship 30 years ago. That she chose to have such a relationship at some point does not mean she has to agree to any such proposals.
I think you are reading way too much into it.
And when it is clear that you NEVER make the same statements about men doing these things,
Can you point to a case where a man did something similar and I ignored it?
You know why Trumo cheats on his wives and seeks younger women. He’s trying to elevate his reputation. He does it repeatedly. Pathologically.
Again, whataboutism. And hypocrisy. Trump seeking out younger women is pathological, Brown seeking out younger women is ok.
Meanwhile a woman dates an older man for one period in her life and you can’t shut up about it. How long ago was this? You’re the only one who can’t see what message this sends.
I only brought it up as an example of a double standard to contrast it with how false sexual claims against Vance are treated very differently. I did not intend for it to spark such a long conversation, but you all are proving my point that there is a double standard.
You lose your mind because something from Kamala Harris' sexual past was mentioned, but you are fine with lies about JD Vance's sexual past being spread by the vice presidential candidate.
Interestingly, I know personally two couples with large (25+ years) age differences. One with a younger woman, one with a younger man. They are not transactional. SO your claim “but it’s rare, therefore Harris must have been transactional” sounds hollow, misogynistic and petulant.
Bullshit. You are ignoring the part where he helped her career. That is what makes it likely that it was transactional - there is a transaction!
Same with your couples. If there is some evidence of transnationality, like the older person being wealthy and spending a lot of money on the younger partner, that would also indicate that the relationship is very likely transactional.
And you cannot shut up about it. Your claim is not convincing in the least.
No, you cannot shut up about it. I just mentioned it as an example of the double standard vis-a-vis Vance. It would have been over at that had you and others not proven me right by keeping acting all outraged about it.