None of these are family sitcoms. And in Big Bang Theory they made sure to emasculate Howard (he has to beg for allowance for example) by making Bernadette make much more money than he does, even though in real world aerospace engineers outearn microbiologists.
Usually, that's true. But Howard is working in academia, although he isn't teaching (I don't think) so he won't be making big bucks. If Bernadette is making big bucks, it's because she is working for Big Pharma in tv fantasy land.
The thing about the whole Howard/Bernadette dynamic is threefold:
1. Howard has a dysfunctional and overly close relationship with his mother and an absent father.
2. Prior to Bernadette, Howard was at best, a sexist pig who could not stop hitting on Penny or virtually any other female and whose main purpose in life outside of his job and geeky interests was scamming on women, any woman, whom he reduced to stereotypes. So, this thing with Bernadette earning more money, and acting like his mother a)plays into #1 above b)is an amusing turnabout for Howard and c)the allowance thing wouldn't have happened if Howard weren't irresponsible with money and household chores and acted like a grown up instead of a spoilt little boy.
3. Bernadette is tiny and blonde and very sweet looking, like a sweet little Catholic girl. The fact that she's domineering is funny because it is such an unexpected trait given her physical persona and her voice.
BTW, what gives with thinking that if a woman earns more money than a man then the man is emasculated? The 50's called and they want their attitudes back, dude. My husband assures me he would be thrilled if I out-earned him. I would be, too, assuming it wasn't because his earnings sank below the level of mine. Of course, I believe him because he sure wasn't complaining when I did earn more than he did.
Yeah, remember the Cosby Show?
Yeah, the only boy (Theo) was the dumb one, as per the sexist trope. Also the wife character was horrible. She didn't let Heathcliff do anything!
You must be forgetting Denise, the family screw up/air head. Theo wasn't dumb, but it was discovered that he had a learning disability--dyslexia, which in fact, is more common in males than in females.
Claire just tried to keep Heathcliff on the straight and narrow when it came to eating right. That's pretty much one of those things that a whole lot of wives do, Derec. But don't you worry your pretty little head about that: I let my husband retain his masculinity by taking out the trash and mowing the lawn although I am more than capable of doing both. And I also let him cook. And he lets me have the horrible commute. It's all about the balance.
But that's exactly why Frozen is proof that men are being persecuted. Up until recent years, every single female character was a foil for a male character. Now we occasionally get movies in which the male characters are foil to female characters, thus it is proven that males are being persecuted by Hollywood.
But we were also taught for years that such foils are sexist and patriarchal. Are matriarchal foils any less sexist? Why?
Have you actually seen
Frozen, Derec? Because trust me, the girls come across as being pretty stupid, too. I managed to sit through the whole thing and thought it was just awful. Awful. Awwful. The snowman was the brains of the whole thing and he was a)male and b)made out of snow and c)comic relief. There was still a male rescuer. The older, gifted sister had to be imprisoned and then ran away because her power was so frightening. The younger sister was so gullible that she fell for the first male who batted his eyes at her and who was only after her money and kingdom. So much for female empowerment. The only evidence of 'female empowerment' was that Elsa was to rule the kingdom. She wouldn't have a man, but she would be in charge. Anna, the younger ungifted sister was sufficiently unthreatening to attract male suiters and a potential mate. Blech.
Aside from that, I will agree with you that idiot father as a TV trope is offensive. I don't care for it, either.