Male brains are larger, for a start. Also,
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
No, it's not a 'bug.' There is important evolutionary value to having non-reproducing members of any group. In much/most of human history, not all humans who lived to reproductive age actually reproduced. Individuals contribute to the survival of the group, with whom they may likely share genes by supporting reproductive individuals, providing for young, for elderly, basically doing every thing except making a baby.
I guarantee I know more about the actual biology of sex than you. I'm using actual information and science as opposed to wishes.
Wow... that was... well, I mean not even going into answering my questions. Neurologically, explain it.Male brains are larger, for a start. Also,
Sex differences in the brain: Implications for behavioral and biomedical research
Biological differences between males and females are found at multiple levels. However, females have too often been under-represented in behavioral neuroscience research, which has stymied the study of potential sex differences in neurobiology and behavior. ...
Meanwhile duckbilled platypuses don't lay eggs because they are mammals. Also quantum physics doesn't exist because it doesn't neatly simplify into our previous understanding of subatomic physics.
Generally speaking, male brains are larger (a result of their heads being larger). That said, however, there are also differences in the "wrinkliness" and the proportion of white matter to grey matter. None of those differences are predictive however, as the degree of overlap between the distributions makes those distinctions irrelevant.
You're not correct. Here's a Wiki, documenting the fact that there are true hermaphroditic individuals, at least some of whom are capable of reproducting. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/True_...s referred to,containing both types of tissue.
No human has ever fertilized themselves. However, there are humans who produce both egg and sperm and at least some individuals have reproduced.
Thanks. I was talking about the brain and what it does, not what it looks like.
Interesting... so it sounds like the answer is "we have no clue". So when talking genders, it seems kind of stupid to shoehorn male and female based on everything about the human body, except what is going on in the most IMPORTANT part (as in by like several magnitudes) of the body.
I suppose if we want to reduce our massively complicated neurological system into a Facebook JPG meme, that might work. But in reality, my mind is reacting to stimuli and it is firing off a particular reaction. That isn't preference, that is a neurological fingerprint that has a physical reason behind it. Us not understanding such things doesn't make it okay to handwave and ignore it as merely a "preference".
In all that learning do you have examples of any mammal that can change its sex?
Today on qualifications, we discuss why they matter and their significance, especially in attempts to try and mask that you know you are full of it. In the post above you'll notice a qualification added regarding biology, but only of mammals, and excluding the rest of the animal kingdom. This is done in a desperate attempt to hide the fact they themselves know that there are animals that are indeed capable of doing this, but hope no one will notice the smokescreen and how they are arguing against a concept they know is actually true.
What the hell does it matter what’s going on in someone’s head? You either have a male or female body. When you see an attractive Asian woman, do you care how she self identifies? That like saying you read Playboy for the articles.
No, it really isn't. It's not even particularly difficult to find exceptions. But there's none so blind as those who will not see.
This is so dumb. Some animals can fly. Some animals lay eggs. Some animals can regenerate missing body parts. Humans can’t.
The trans erasure of women. Well done.
On the contrary; Presenting your opinion as if it's "scientific reality", without reference to the observations of reality that are an essential element of science, is flat-eartherism.
But what does hermaphroditism have to do with transgenderism? And, of course, hermaphroditism just reenforces nature’s strict sex binary: no hermaphrodite has a third sex.
Of course it's a qualification. Humans are not clownfish.
Then why did you ask in the first place?
Because humans are mammals. Mammals cannot change their birth sex regardless of what’s going on in their heads. Everyone knows this. Using non-mammalian examples to say that humans can do things that they can’t is just sophistry.
