This thread is the hamster wheel of Freethought.
This thread is the hamster wheel of Freethought.
Meh, quibbling a bit...I'd say it is "a hamster wheel" within Freethought, not "the hamster wheel"This thread is the hamster wheel of Freethought.
Meh, quibbling a bit...I'd say it is "a hamster wheel" within Freethought, not "the hamster wheel"This thread is the hamster wheel of Freethought.
but it is necessary for progressMeh, quibbling a bit...I'd say it is "a hamster wheel" within Freethought, not "the hamster wheel"This thread is the hamster wheel of Freethought.
If Freethought had a Midway, this thread would be the double ferris wheel.
More of a petting zoo.
Nothing really dangerous in here, nothing really mind-blowing, and nothing really different from any petting zoo at any fair, zoo, roadside attraction, Sheep & Wool Festival, birthday party.
And it's just like every other Syed thread.
Meh, quibbling a bit...I'd say it is "a hamster wheel" within Freethought, not "the hamster wheel"This thread is the hamster wheel of Freethought.
If Freethought had a Midway, this thread would be the double ferris wheel.
back to your main idea that slavery was necessary, slavery could have been theorized it didn't have to be implemented; slavery isn't necessary for progress.syed said:human made progress because of slaverywhich begs the question "is slavery progress?"
I could see THAT, sure, and probably most of us do. Slavery happened during a period when civilizations rose. Syed just happily confuses 'did happen that way' with 'the only possible way that could have happened' and calls it the will of his particular superstition.the logistics of human societal advances and how slavery played a role in it.
Well that is just RIDICULOUS!!! Paganism is clearly the key component of why and how those great civilizations rose!I could see THAT, sure, and probably most of us do. Slavery happened during a period when civilizations rose. Syed just happily confuses 'did happen that way' with 'the only possible way that could have happened' and calls it the will of his particular superstition.the logistics of human societal advances and how slavery played a role in it.
back to your main idea that slavery was necessary, slavery could have been theorized it didn't have to be implemented; slavery isn't necessary for progress.syed said:human made progress because of slaverywhich begs the question "is slavery progress?"
I didn't reply because i thought paul needed help.
I replied because you have a sucky record at replying to questions.Then why didn't he say to free slaves before slavery started?2) he said to free slave
Why didn't he just create civilization?
he did said to free slaveOkay. Allah didn't need slavery. Got it.allah dont NEED slavery to build a civilization but EARLY human NEEDED slavery to build a civilization
Humans needed slavery. Allah allowed them to own slaves.
Allah must have wanted human slavery to exist.
Why did Allah want human slavery to exist, Syed?
allah didnt want human slavery to exist but he accepted this is the only way human will makes progress
Then why didn't he do anything to stop it once Civilization was established?
When they had, you know, money?
i already mention that early human did not invented moneyAfter the domestication of horses, cattle and dogs, slavery is unnecessary.
do you mean horse , cattle and gods able to do human work?
Guided by humans, they provide horsepower. The rest humans can do for a fair salary.
.
I saw the thread title and presumed a social science study/paper/book was going to be attached discussing the logistics of human societal advances and how slavery played a role in it.
I was disappointed but not surprised.
tell us how would roman, egypt and greek would have built their civilization without slavery?
You keep missing the point. You are arguing that your God wanted ancient civilisations to exist, so he had to let people keep slaves. But that doesn't make any sense alongside the assertion you have made elsewhere that your God is all-powerful and can do anything. If your God is supposed to be powerful and smart enough to create the universe, he's certainly powerful and smart enough to come up with a way to make civilisation develop without slavery.
The basic point is simple: if an all-powerful God exists, then whatever he wants, he gets. That's what all-powerful means. So whatever we observe to be actually the case -- like thousands of years of slavery -- must have been exactly what God wanted.
Early human slavery was NECESSARY for human progress
The principles of cooperation, reward and shared benefits works quite well.
Syed, did you run out of steam?back to your main idea that slavery was necessary, slavery could have been theorized it didn't have to be implemented; slavery isn't necessary for progress.syed said:human made progress because of slaverywhich begs the question "is slavery progress?"
Syed, you have drawn attention to the fact that civilization correlates with slavery.I didn't reply because i thought paul needed help.
I replied because you have a sucky record at replying to questions.Then why didn't he say to free slaves before slavery started?2) he said to free slave
Why didn't he just create civilization?
before slavery started? i want some what you drinking