Don2 (Don1 Revised)
Contributor
In before "14 is legal in Europe."
1. Pedophilia only refers to attraction to prepubescent children.
2. Trump probably had dealings with 1000s of people in his business life. 5 of them were involved with underage girls is not that unusual statistically.
1. Pedophilia only refers to attraction to prepubescent children.
2. Trump probably had dealings with 1000s of people in his business life. 5 of them were involved with underage girls is not that unusual statistically.
He participated in at least four of the rapes!
He participated in at least four of the rapes!
Yeah, but he knew thousands of people.
If you know a thousand people and fuck one donkey, do they call you "people-knower" or "donkey-fucker"?
Edit: I suppose a lot of the answer depends on whether the person answering it wants to fuck donkeys or not.
My reply wasn't even about Epstein per se but about that stupid picture ZiprHead posted.That is you take home from this? Fine, Jeffrey Epstein is involved with sex trafficking of underage girls.
Of course there is a difference. Pedophilia is a serious allegation, and to throw it around at people willy-nilly is just bad. Especially if you only do it to score cheap political points, like whoever created that picture.Hate to break it to you, but with the exception of Roy Moore most people don't think there is a difference.
There are a lot more people who had relationships with 16 year olds than there are actual pedophiles, which is quite rare, as well as disgusting. Which is why we should refrain from libelous accusation of pedophilia against people who are not.So name three.
Nope. I am going to bat for accuracy in the use of language. A 16 or even 14 year old is not a prepubescent child.Hmm, going to bat for a pedophile?
Do you have any evidence thatHe knew that Epstein was a pedophile.
How do you know that? At most there have been accusations. Accusation is not proof.He participated in at least four of the rapes!
rotfl: ARE WE BEING UNFAIR TO YOUR AUTHORITY FIGURE? ARE WE?
What evidence is there that he was friends with any of these people rather than just a business partner? We already know whoever wrote this shit thinks that consensual (and in many places legal) affairs with 16 year olds are the same as "pedophilia" so I would think he has similar difficulties in differentiating friendships and business dealings.I like how you jumped from “is friends with” to the more easily defended “had dealings with as a business person.”
Known pedophiles? Just because they are being called that in an anonymous jpeg?Nice dodge to defend the guy who is FRIENDS WITH five KNOWN pedophiles.
Again, and for the millionth time, sexual relationship with somebody under 18 != pedophilia. It is not even illegal in most places.Great instincts to make excuses for the pedophiles.
rotfl: ARE WE BEING UNFAIR TO YOUR AUTHORITY FIGURE? ARE WE?
You are being unfair toward him, but no he is not "my" figure at all. I didn't even vote for him and only think he is right on two things - illegal migration and dangers of Iran, but he is making a dog's breakfast out of both crises.
So no, I do not support Trump. That does not mean I support maligning him unfairly. I would defend Clinton (who was also Epstein's guest at times) and indeed, I have defended him back when he was president and accused of many things.
In before, "the women accusing him are crazy liars."
In before Trump supporters point the finger at Clinton while simultaneously insisting Donald "hardly knew the guy."
A 16 or even 14 year old is not a prepubescent child.
rotfl: ARE WE BEING UNFAIR TO YOUR AUTHORITY FIGURE? ARE WE?
You are being unfair toward him, but no he is not "my" figure at all. I didn't even vote for him and only think he is right on two things - illegal migration and dangers of Iran, but he is making a dog's breakfast out of both crises.
So no, I do not support Trump. That does not mean I support maligning him unfairly. I would defend Clinton (who was also Epstein's guest at times) and indeed, I have defended him back when he was president and accused of many things.
You defend the powerful, regardless of what they are doing to the powerless. We see you, jumping to defend predators.
A 16 or even 14 year old is not a prepubescent child.
You DO know this isn't always true, correct?
View attachment 22405
So which president with a credible rape allegation will be more hurt by this arrest?
View attachment 22405
So which president with a credible rape allegation will be more hurt by this arrest?
I just want to know who he has compromising information on that he was able to slither away the last time.
Also, he has had many people supporting him, allegedly, and many now have federal immunity, if I understand correctly? Not to mention all his powerful friends, which include British royalty.
This is some real True Detective shit.