Consider my three points. I am not for banning immigration by Muslims in general, but there need to be reasonable standards regarding numbers, what kind of people you let immigrate and a way to get rid of criminals. Why these three points should be in any way controversial is baffling to me.
Because you're being a duplicitous twat, Derec. What you're doing is no different than when white supremacists claim that they simply want "reasonable immigration policies," and then start linking to hate site after hate site, or start cataloguing every crime committed by a latino and posting racist propaganda about a Hispanic takeover of the U.S., all the while acting puzzled when people call them racists. And while it wouldn't surprise me at all if you hold such moronic views, you're far less aggressive in broadcasting them than you are in this case, because you know you have a better chance of getting away with demonizing Muslims on an atheist board.
As to "taking over one town at a time", that's just a consequence of mass migration. When you let in a huge number of people in from a very different culture there is not much pressure to integrate - because there are so many of them they can form parallel societies. They do not settle uniformly, but congregate such that they form local majorities while still having relatively low population numbers overall. Hence, taking over one town at a time. Many parts of major European cities (like Rickeby/Little Mogadishu in Stockholm) are already taken over by Islam.
No it isn't, and no, they're not. You are blowing shit entirely out of proportion to suit your agenda. There is no Muslim takeover of Europe. That lots of Muslims have immigrated, congregated in certain areas and some of those communities have problems is not evidence that Muslims are "taking over." That's fearmongering codswallop that you buy into because it conforms to your worldview, not because it's what the evidence suggests.
This is just a consequence of mass migration coupled with high birth rates. Their population share keeps increasing, and will keep increasing. If you extrapolate, they will become majority in Europe in a few decades, unless there is a major policy change or they start giving up Islam en masse (unlikely with them forming parallel societies rather than integrating).
That's not how demographic trends work. There are no credible projections showing Muslims becoming a majority in Europe in the near future, or anything close to a majority. It's a fucking fantasy, again a product of your warped version of reality, not anything resembling evidence.
Sharia patrols are also a real thing. For example the UK one even has it's own wiki page:
Sharia patrols
There are also such patrols (calling themselves "police") in Wuppertal, Germany:
German court acquits 'Sharia Police' in Wuppertal
I'm aware that there are people, mostly young Muslim men, who have attempted such "patrols;" the fact that they were reined in by the authorities is indication that the Muslim "takeover" you keep screaming chicken little over isn't happening. Problematic for people living in the immediate area? Certainly, but not evidence of this apocalyptic neo-caliphate end times scenario you've built in your echo chamber of a mind.
Extremist/fundamentalist Muslims are innately incompatible with Western societies and should not be allowed to immigrate at all, much less in large numbers. When you have a mass, chaotic influx of migrants there is no way to check people for compatibility with Western values. Thus, many people incompatible with those values will end up coming in. That is especially true when they tend to come from areas where Islamic fundamentalism is a majority position (or in case of Afghanistan, almost universal position).
Regarding your tired talking points about fundamentalism: while I agree it's something we don't need more of, it's utterly impossible to screen for, since anyone can claim to believe anything at any time. All you can verify is their nationality and appearance, which, in reality, is what you'd clearly
like to turn people away based on. And that makes you a fucking bigot; but worst of all, you don't even seem to recognize it.
Besides, if you were so concerned about "Western values," and people who are antithetical to them, then you'd spend your time complaining about the tens, even hundreds of millions of people who support lunatics like Donald Trump, Geert Wilders and Marine le Pen. Yet we hear nary a peep out of you about that. We all know why: it's much easier, and more satisfying for you, to fixate on the single-digit percentage of the population who belongs to the one demographic that's still an open target in public discourse.
You are proving my point that the only thing you have are insults and name-calling.
Look, you can hide behind the "warpoet is a meanie" defense if you want. But the fact of the matter is you've left a long enough trail of bigoted rhetoric, propaganda and hyperbole on this board to make any attempt at shaking off the accusation of bigotry pointless. You've gotten away with it, primarily because of the board's atheist userbase and increasingly relaxed moderation. But it is what it is and people are going to call you out on it.
And even if you had better arguments than the ones you present ad nauseam in thread after thread, your credibility is undercut by the fact that you waste all your free time on this board stewing over wildly exaggerated problems that have no fucking affect on your daily life to begin with, even though close to 100% of the users here think you're an idiot. So why don't you take this hogwash to one of the countless hate sites where people think like you do, or just go find a more productive hobby, like building model airplanes or collecting stamps or some shit?
