What evidence do you have that they are any more decent and caring than the brits? Or the previous arrivals for that matter? Or is it that as soon as they arrive the corrupting influence of the British soil will turn shed them of all their decency and caring?
I'll take that as abandoning your claim that Southeast Asians are a separate species. So, addressing your new points... Those groups are just as evolved as your own is -- evolution is able to multitask. Evaluation of a group as useless is a purely subjective matter. You have no use for them; well, they probably have no use for you either. And you appear to be arguing that your group's natural reaction to them is to obstruct them and practice predation upon them, which calls into question whether those groups actually are any more obstructive and predatory than your own. Finally, on what grounds do you regard the "Manifest Destiny" reaction as an iota more "natural" than the "Many Fuzzy Dust Bunnies" reaction? Both are the consequence of most people unthinkingly reacting to situations in whatever way their respective Lamarckian-evolved cultures have preadapted them to react.
Immigration has always benefitted the host country as they generally take the jobs the natives shun. In the case of Moslems, that's completely turned upside down. In my country for example, more than 85% of asylum seekers granted asylum, are still collecting government benefits five years, and in most cases, even longer. A huge burden on any country's budget!
Yeah, unforgivable. The gall of the US to place troops in Saudi Arabia at the request of the Saudi government to protect them from Saddam's army. But you are right, that was what Ben Laden said was the reason.
What makes you think that 9/11 wouldn't have happened if there were no American bases in Saudi Arabia?
It's the only way to avoid an Islamic invasion!
