Do you have something against freedom of speech?
I have something against an extremist minority demanding to impose their will onto others.
Same goes for extremist "protesters" in the US right now.
Anyone is allowed to make such demands in a free society (just as I am allowed to tell them to get fucked).
Once they are a majority, they can take over the government and pass laws banning alcohol and pork though. Not to mention that
leftist auto-dhimmies love to appease Muslims even when they are not yet a majority.
Of course, historically only one religion has managed to prohibit alcohol sales in a western nation; And it was not Islam, and not in Europe.
If you mean US Prohibition, it was not chiefly a religious effort, unless you want to label feminism a religion.
Anyway, I am not talking of 100 years ago, I am talking about here and now. And the current anti-alcohol efforts come from Muslims.
There ARE no sharia zones. They are a figment of right-wing imagination.
There have been Sharia zones set up in England as well as in Germany where Muslim vigilantes have been enforcing Islamic rules.
Their values are fundamentally incompatible with ours. Why were they allowed to immigrate?
Seriously. Ask anyone who has been to London in the last decade. This is not a thing that exists. I was in London a couple of years ago - some time AFTER you first made that claim; And I have family in London (in one of the places with a high population of Muslims, and West Indians, and Africans, and Irishmen) and I can assure you that this isn't a thing.
And I guess all the Islamist stabbings and vehicle attacks, not to mention the tube bombings, are a figment of my imagination too?
Christianity isn't compatible with modern society in London either.
For the most part Christianity has modernized. Islam hasn't. There aren't roving bands of Christians wearing medieval garb trying to impose medieval Christian rules on people of London or Wuppertal, Germany.
It's not a problem; The fundies say "you can't do that because it's against my religion", and everyone else says "fuck off".
Those fundies are a small minority of Christians in England. But 99% of Afghans and 84% of Pakistanis support Sharia, according to a Pew study. And those are among the countries with most mass migrants invading Europe.
I know. It's hard to believe that you are quite that persistent in your error; Yet here we are, having debunked your bullshit for a decade, and still you persist with it.
You have debunked nothing. The next census in UK is due soon. How much do you want to bet that the map will be a great deal greener with data from the new census?
A thing that hasn't happened doesn't have real effects.
It has not happened
yet so it doesn't have effects
yet. But unless something changes drastically (expel all Islamists and severely restrict Islamic immigration), I do not see how present trends will not continue until a majority of London is Muslim by 2050 at the latest.
Yup. That's why all of London became Irish. Or was it West Indian? Or Catholic? I forget. Anyway, it definitely got taken over.
Who is the Mayor of London? Some Irishman? Or is it a Muslim from Pakistan who doesn't like photos of women in bikinis?
Finally you are catching on!
Therefore your alleged racism is, in this case, merely ethnic hatred.
Islam is not an ethnicity either. It is a religion, which is a set of ideas. We must be free to vociferously oppose ideas, especially those as destructive to Western societies as Islam!
They shouldn't say such wrong things; bigots deserve to be called bigots, not racists.
IT'S NOT BIGOTRY TO OPPOSE DESTRUCTIVE IDEAS!!!
But I am sure that your (literally) cartoonish arguments are more than a match for mere mathematics.
What mathematics? How about mathematics of exponential growth? Afghans have on average 5 children per woman. Which means an increase of a little less than 2.5x per generation due to not all children surviving to reproductive age. So let's say 2.3. That means that 1,000,000 Afghans in Europe will multiply to over five million in mere two generations. 28 million in four generations.
I expect there are loads of people on welfare who are practically billionaires.
They don't have to be billionaires. They just have to make more than they would in Afghanistan. Imagine - more money and you don't even have to work for it! That's why they sell land and pay thousands of dollars to the smugglers. And idiot European governments are letting them play the system.