You don’t distinguish between destruction of property and violence against human beings in terms of severity/morality?
I do, but wantonly destroying property or looting stores is not a "peaceful protest".
I also dislike destructive riots that damage public and private property but I think such destruction is far less destructive and far less indefensible than attacking and harming fellow human beings.
#BLM riots had been quite deadly. In addition to rioters who got killed as a consequence of their actions - like a guy who was run over while looting a FedEx truck in St. Louis - #BLM rioters have killed innocent people. Like the rioter who murdered a retired police captain also in St. Louis. Or the rioter who set fire to a pawn shop killing a man in Minneapolis (he received a sweetheart deal after the prosecutor with Biden/Garland DOJ argued for leniency because of the rioter's political beliefs). Or the rioter who murdered an 8 year old girl in Atlanta. Should I go on?
And I would not dismiss property damage either. Burning down a business, vandalizing a government building or a museum, torching cars etc. harms real people even if not physically. Property damage is not a valid form of political expression. I think you agree with that, right?