Minnesota Democratic state Rep. Sandra Feist, who introduced the “Menstrual Equity Bill” to provide all students access to menstrual products, insisted during a Jan. 11 education policy hearing that the amendment restricting the products to only female bathrooms should not be supported for multiple reasons. "I would encourage the committee to vote no on this amendment for a few reasons: practical, financial, social, emotional,” Feist said during the hearing. “First, there are a lot of schools that are moving towards gender-neutral bathrooms and if we add ‘female’ we might become obsolete very quickly. Second, not all students who menstruate are female – we need to make sure that all students have access to these products.” Feist did concede that there would be much less “non-female menstruating students,” which she noted had been factored into the cost of the bill.