• Welcome to the new Internet Infidels Discussion Board, formerly Talk Freethought.

Split Gendered spaces, split from Drag Shows

To notify a split thread.
What rights are you talking about?
The right to equal treatment under the law regardless of sex.
A grown man has a right to be naked with a little girl?
Depending on the context, it's not necessarily a problem.

I've showered with prepubescent boys, their aunt and uncle, and their grandma, all at the same time.

Everyone involved knew and chose being in the context of a naturist campground.
Tom
 
What rights are you talking about?
The right to equal treatment under the law regardless of sex.
Trans people have that.
Tom
Yes, they most certainly do. That's why so many not trans people are angry and scared, and why the alt-right is so successfully using this as a wedge issue to further their anti-Constitutional agenda.
LOL. Toni and Emily are “alt-right.”
 
What rights are you talking about?
The right to equal treatment under the law regardless of sex.
Trans people have that.
Tom
Yes, they most certainly do. That's why so many not trans people are angry and scared, and why the alt-right is so successfully using this as a wedge issue to further their anti-Constitutional agenda.
Exactly!
Everyone has an entitlement to use a restroom.
The problem is when some people feel entitled to special rights.
Which is what we're talking about here.
Tom
 
So... if a male-bodied person say out loud that they are trans, then women have no say in the matter?
Why would anyone get a "say" in someone else's opinion about themselves?
How do we tell that they're actually trans, as opposed to just a man up to no good?
You could perhaps look at whether they get up to no good, and if they do, penalise them for it.

How do you tell that the black man behind you in the line at the ATM is actually a bank customer, as opposed to a mugger?

If he's holding an ATM card, are you supposed to just believe that he's just another customer? Do you get no say in the matter? :rolleyesa:

In a non-bigoted society, all people are sanctioned based only on their actual behaviours. Not on the behaviours we imagine that they might indulge in, based on filtering their physical appearance through our biases. No matter how fearful we might be, this remains the defining feature of non-bigoted society.
 
What rights are you talking about?
The right to equal treatment under the law regardless of sex.
Trans people have that.
Tom
Yes, they most certainly do. That's why so many not trans people are angry and scared, and why the alt-right is so successfully using this as a wedge issue to further their anti-Constitutional agenda.
LOL. Toni and Emily are “alt-right.”
No, this issue is being spun by the alt-right. Toni and Emily just fell for the bait. We wouldn't be talking about this question at all, positively or negatively, had not far right news sources started pitching this largely fictitious scenario as an imminent threat back in 2019.
 
In a non-bigoted society, all people are sanctioned based only on their actual behaviours. Not on the behaviours we imagine that they might indulge in, based on filtering their physical appearance through our biases. No matter how fearful we might be, this remains the defining feature of non-bigoted society.
Exactly. This, for me, is the main point.
 
No, this issue is being spun by the alt-right. Toni and Emily just fell for the bait. We wouldn't be talking about this question at all, positively or negatively, had not far right news sources started pitching this largely fictitious scenario as an imminent threat back in 2019.
It's every bit as politically useful and abuseable by the Wokesters*.
This did not start in 2019.
Tom

*alt-left, whatever
 
No, this issue is being spun by the alt-right. Toni and Emily just fell for the bait. We wouldn't be talking about this question at all, positively or negatively, had not far right news sources started pitching this largely fictitious scenario as an imminent threat back in 2019.
It's every bit as politically useful and abuseable by the Wokesters*.
This did not start in 2019.
Tom

*alt-left, whatever
Oh? If you have knowledge of an older use of the trope, that is interesting but not very relevant. The myth that trans women are attacking the adult gym locker rooms of America is of relatively recent origin, and is being spread for politically cynical reasons.
 
Oh? If you have knowledge of an older use of the trope, that is interesting but not very relevant. The myth that trans women are attacking the adult gym locker rooms of America is of relatively recent origin, and is being spread for politically cynical reasons.
To which trope are you referring? That the vast majority of women want a male free space for personal business? And the vast majority of men want women to have that?

Sorry. I see the problem as largely the result of marriage equality costing the alt-left a major source of support and fundage.
Tom
 
What rights are you talking about?
The right to equal treatment under the law regardless of sex.
Trans people have that.
Tom
Yes, they most certainly do. That's why so many not trans people are angry and scared, and why the alt-right is so successfully using this as a wedge issue to further their anti-Constitutional agenda.
LOL. Toni and Emily are “alt-right.”
No, this issue is being spun by the alt-right. Toni and Emily just fell for the bait. We wouldn't be talking about this question at all, positively or negatively, had not far right news sources started pitching this largely fictitious scenario as an imminent threat back in 2019.
The “alt-right.”

 
When you're asking for rights to be taken away from the disadvantaged, you've stepped over the line. It's not complicated.
Apparently Poli has decided, as the manly man that he is, that women are NOT disadvantaged. Or at least, he has decided that he doesn't give a fuck about the disadvantages that women face. Women's disadvantages aren't nearly as important as the feels of a subset of males.
It's relative. Transwomen are far more disadvantaged than women in general.
 
It's relative. Transwomen are far more disadvantaged than women in general.

Are they? Growing up male has a ton of advantages.

And what we're talking about here isn't life in general. Nobody thinks trans people should have trouble with employment, education, housing, or anything like that. All we're talking about is using one restroom, right next door to and nearly identical to the other one.

That's it.
Tom
 
The fact is, some day a person claiming to be a trans woman is going to rape someone in a bathroom.
Hate to be the one to break it to you dude.
But Hannah Tubbs isn't the first or only trans woman convicted of sexually assaulting a female. IIRC, it was in the restroom at a Denny's restaurant.
Please note that they were male-presenting at the time of the offense. This says nothing about the safety of allowing female-presenting individuals into women's restrooms.
What makes a person claiming a trans identity "male presenting"?
They were not claiming trans identity at the time of the offense.
 
They were not claiming trans identity at the time of the offense.

Hannah Tubbs is a male woman who sexually assaulted a female in the women's restroom of a family restaurant.

I don't care what she was wearing at the time.
Tom
 
We are trying to determine how trans-women can access an area they have a right to be in
I'm like 95% on board with you, but not with this. No male has a right to be in female-only spaces. How they identify to themselves in their subjective and unverifiable minds is of no account. They are still male, that cannot be changed. And no male has a *right* to be in female spaces. They might have *permission* from women in some cases, but not a *right*.
I get that. The trouble, your definition while in most cases is undeniable fact, we are talking about the few cases it is not, where it is gray, and muddled. And our understanding of what is and isn't gender extends past sexual organs. I get you don't want to go there, for whatever reason. But it seems undeniable that despite the organs trans people have, their gender (not merely how they "identify") is different from the organs. The only way for this to be true is that gender is a lot more neurological than it is physical. In general, these align nicely, but not always.
Twenty years ago, I would have agreed. Now I do not.

Let me be clear: there are some few people with intense dysphoria. In some of those people, there is a neurological problem with self-perception, similar in nature to the neurological disconnect associated with anorexia and with BIID. Those people exist. And for those people, surgical transition frequently ends up being the only avenue to peace. I get that, and I feel great sympathy for them.

And even ten years ago, I would have happily been willing to accommodate those few males as if they were figurative women, and allow them into my single-sex spaces.

But those are NOT the same people who are currently identifying as trans. They simply aren't. In fact, those people get labeled as "tru-scum" and are ill-treated by the current generation of "trans" people.

Please, go spend some time on reddit, on twitter, on instagram, on tiktok, on youtube. Go and actually look into what the current transgender organizations are asking for, and look at the people they are fighting for. Go look at the numerous events where women have come together to try to discuss the conflict between transgender and women's rights. Go look at the hordes of people who show up to terrorize those women, who harass and threaten them.

This is one of the barriers with this entire topic. Almost everyone is carrying around an image of what a transgender person is... and that image is two decades out of touch with now. Everyone carries around an image of trans as being Blair White, hell, I'll even give you Laverne Cox.

But counted among the current group of transgender identified males are also the likes of Alex Drummond, Danielle Muscato, Jessica Yaniv, and yes - Eddie Izzard.

You are very generously and graciously extending an assumption to all transgender people, that everyone who claims a transgender identity actually has this disconnect between brain and body that you reference. The problem is that the current transgender rights activists are very vocal that gender dysphoria is NOT required for a person to be transgender.

Genuinely - go spend some time in those spaces that trans people frequent, especially online. Go immerse yourself in it. Go see what is actually going on. It's not what you think it is. It used to be that, but it no longer is.
 
Because the adults in the room have already accepted that women have a right to be the women's locker room.

In what way have people like Toni, me, or Emily accepted that?
I absolutely do not accept it.

On multiple levels, I don't accept that.
Tom
:oops: I really think you're misreading Jimmy's post. I mean, really really misreading it.

Because, you know, I'm pretty sure that I have a right to be in the women's locker room. I think all females of the human species have a right to be in the women's locker room.
 
Because the adults in the room have already accepted that women have a right to be the women's locker room.

In what way have people like Toni, me, or Emily accepted that?
Whoa whoa, slow down there. I said adults.
dd-composite-the-finger.jpg
 
Question for the class

Should a post op, top and bottom, trans woman be considered a woman who should be allow in women-only spaces?
Provided they behave, I have no objection.

The question I have is... how do we tell? And that's the problem. Short of asking any male-looking person to drop trou and prove they haven't got a willy, there's no way to tell.

And if I end up in a position of having to allow in any male who says they're trans, or allowing in no males at all, I'm going to have to land on none at all.

It's not my preference, but the good will of women has been abused and exploited, and I'm not standing for it any longer.
 
Back
Top Bottom