• Welcome to the new Internet Infidels Discussion Board, formerly Talk Freethought.

How is this not overwhelming evidence Trump is a Russian Agent?

And I was.
You were saying that Russia told NATO not to expand as if that was somehow a justification for war.
It IS, according to US politics it employs it is.
I was pointing out that Russia has expanded into areas Muslims consider their realm. You can't have it both ways.
Muslims are somehow special, you can't expand into their "realm"? Are you some kind Islamic scholar/terrorist?

You claimed expanding into "Russian" areas is wrong. I'm simply applying the same standard.
 
And I was.

It IS, according to US politics it employs it is.

Muslims are somehow special, you can't expand into their "realm"? Are you some kind Islamic scholar/terrorist?

You claimed expanding into "Russian" areas is wrong. I'm simply applying the same standard.
No, you said expanding into Ukraine was wrong.
 
You didn't even try reading the linked page.
I did, you were trying to say that Karmal was a russian puppet and he was and I never argued otherwise.
Now what?

But Brabak was part of the coup and a founding member of the PDPA... meaning he wasn't installed after the invasion - that was actually a reinstallation. Meaning the sequence of events was both governments vying for favor with the monarchy, Soviet backing of the coup, US non-military aid to the mujahideen, Soviet invasion, then US military aid.

Brzezinski never said otherwise, and you tossed out a specious claim that he did. In any of his books.
 
You didn't even try reading the linked page.
I did, you were trying to say that Karmal was a russian puppet and he was and I never argued otherwise.
Now what?

But Brabak was part of the coup and a founding member of the PDPA... meaning he wasn't installed after the invasion - that was actually a reinstallation.
So fucking what?
Meaning the sequence of events was both governments vying for favor with the monarchy, Soviet backing of the coup, US non-military aid to the mujahideen, Soviet invasion, then US military aid.

Brzezinski never said otherwise, and you tossed out a specious claim that he did. In any of his books.
Yes he did. In his interview he confirmed what CIA director wrote in his book. It's been common knowledge for 20 years. Yet here comes you and repeat BS Ronald Raygun was pushing while he was president. US government lied about Cuban missile crisis, Vietnam war, Afghan war, Iran-Contras and Iraq war, deal with it. and when you have, tell me how likely is it that US government is not lying about their involvement in Ukraine?
 
And I was.

It IS, according to US politics it employs it is.

Muslims are somehow special, you can't expand into their "realm"? Are you some kind Islamic scholar/terrorist?

You claimed expanding into "Russian" areas is wrong. I'm simply applying the same standard.
No, you said expanding into Ukraine was wrong.

Two issues.

1) Expanding into Ukraine was wrong because that's not what Ukraine wanted. Should I simply be allowed to annex part of your house?

2) I was talking about previous Russian expansion into the -stans. If you shouldn't expand into an area someone else considers their area then Russia shouldn't have gone into any of them. Since Russia did they have no basis for complaining about someone going into an area they consider theirs.
 
No, you said expanding into Ukraine was wrong.

Two issues.

1) Expanding into Ukraine was wrong because that's not what Ukraine wanted.
First of all, not all Ukraine did not want it. Second of all Not all Ukraine even wanted NATO expanding, yet it keeps expanding
Should I simply be allowed to annex part of your house?
Nobody annexed anything yet. People voted (as they had a full right to do) and left Ukraine.
2) I was talking about previous Russian expansion into the -stans. If you shouldn't expand into an area someone else considers their area then Russia shouldn't have gone into any of them. Since Russia did they have no basis for complaining about someone going into an area they consider theirs.
Look who is talking, Why don't you get the hell out of New World and get back to Europe.
Nobody really complained about GB going and "annexing" Crimea for Turkey. I merely reminded you a history that NATO is full of shit when they are bitching about aggressive Russia.
 
First of all, not all Ukraine did not want it. Second of all Not all Ukraine even wanted NATO expanding, yet it keeps expanding

NATO only expands where the people want it to expand. Nobody's forced to participate.

Should I simply be allowed to annex part of your house?
Nobody annexed anything yet. People voted (as they had a full right to do) and left Ukraine.

For practical purposes Russia invaded and annexed part of Ukraine. It's already been explained the vote was a sham because Russia imported a lot of voters and because the status quo wasn't on the ballot.
 
Lewandowski to Democrats: I'm not answering your 'f---ing' questions

"I had to repeat on multiple occasions that there was no collusion, cooperation or coordination because the Democrats couldn't understand my plain English way of speaking," Lewandowski told CNN.

After this story published, Lewandowski told CNN that Democrats on the committee were the first to use foul language during his testimony, saying, "I felt the need to respond in kind." He said he did not shout at the members.

https://www.cnn.com/2018/04/05/politics/corey-lewandowski-russia-investigation/index.html
 
And why isn't he in jail for contempt?

Really. Isn't there a bailiff person there who could escort him away?
"Your privilege claim is bogus. Answer the question or go to jail."

They need some fucking theater, dammit! (Who cares if he bails out immediately and it hangs for three years in court...)
 
And why isn't he in jail for contempt?

Really. Isn't there a bailiff person there who could escort him away?
"Your privilege claim is bogus. Answer the question or go to jail."

They need some fucking theater, dammit! (Who cares if he bails out immediately and it hangs for three years in court...)

You normally can't bail out of a contempt. You're in jail until you comply.
 
And why isn't he in jail for contempt?

Really. Isn't there a bailiff person there who could escort him away?
"Your privilege claim is bogus. Answer the question or go to jail."

They need some fucking theater, dammit! (Who cares if he bails out immediately and it hangs for three years in court...)

You normally can't bail out of a contempt. You're in jail until you comply.

Really?
Is it just that Dems have no testicles, or what? Why aren't they saying "Answer the question or go to jail"?
 
Anyway, SLD, do you see how this is not overwhelming evidence of Trump is a russian agent? :)

Yeah, the real evidence is the fact that he's a Russian agent.
The fact that he owes Russian oligarchs more than he can ever re-pay without stealing from American taxpayers has nothing to do with it.
I'm sure you think he's doing the bidding of uncle Vlad in every way, just to piss off the left.
 
You normally can't bail out of a contempt. You're in jail until you comply.

Really?
Is it just that Dems have no testicles, or what? Why aren't they saying "Answer the question or go to jail"?

Congress has to rely on DoJ, I.e. Trump's DoJ to enforce such a legal violation.

SLD

Huh? They have to call Billybarr, and can't just have him carted off? Fuck that. What if it's Billybarr who is stonewalling? Then whose dick do they have to suck to gain the level of authority of a local dogcatcher?

The ARTICLE ONE branch of our government has no authority????
 
Back
Top Bottom