• Welcome to the new Internet Infidels Discussion Board, formerly Talk Freethought.

How should west respond to potential (likely) Russian invasion of Ukraine?

Kursk Update: Kadyrov's "Akhmat" Troops Captured, Baba Yaga Hits Checkpoint, T-80 Captured​

12.8.2024
An update on Ukraine's incursion into Kursk. A checkpoint was hit by a Baba Yaga drone, a T-80 tank was captured, a D-30 howitzer captured and Russia's newest artillery system the 2S43 Malva was destroyed.

 
Nato was created to ensure US supremacy? Please defend. It was created to stop European countries from being conquered. We don't want any more European war. Since its inception, all euro countries invaded by Russia were non nato. You are implying that the stop US supremacy, allow Euro countries to be invaded. That makes zero sense.
The Allies just banded together against Communist Russia, US being the leader of the gang.
That they will be invaded by Russia is fiction. Russia always had its problems. They were compounded by Allies.

Side topic: Things like Bangladesh change do not happen randomly. They are engineered. In that case Pakistan and China must have been involved. Same about Yugoslavia or Ukraine.
 

Ukraine Continues To Roll Russians in Kursk​


12.8.2024
Day 7 of Ukraine's Invasion of Russia, 1080 Russian casualties, Ukrainian flag flies in Kinburn Spit, Fire at Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant is out, Russia says it was due to two drones attacking it, Ukraine controls 720 KM of Russian territory, the Ukrainian Army plans to stay in Russia, Evacuations in Russia, Dozens of Kadyrov's troops captured, Russia transferring troops from Kharkiv and Donbas to Kursk, Russia overwhelmed with Kursk invasion.
 
Nato was created to ensure US supremacy? Please defend. It was created to stop European countries from being conquered. We don't want any more European war. Since its inception, all euro countries invaded by Russia were non nato. You are implying that the stop US supremacy, allow Euro countries to be invaded. That makes zero sense.
The Allies just banded together against Communist Russia, US being the leader of the gang.
That they will be invaded by Russia is fiction. Russia always had its problems. They were compounded by Allies.

Side topic: Things like Bangladesh change do not happen randomly. They are engineered. In that case Pakistan and China must have been involved. Same about Yugoslavia or Ukraine.
What problems? Are you trying to say that encouraging Russia to not invade a country is bad for Russia? And or good for “American supremacy”? That’s odd. Again please defend your position that a defensive alliance keeps America supreme. Are you trying to say that preventing Russian looting and stealing land keeps them down?
 

Russians Lost 1000 Soldiers in a Single Attack in KURSK​


Huge convoy of Russian troops was sent to Kursk and they were all eliminated with HIMARS, which now can be used in Kursk. This whole truckload of troops surrendered.




I upload on Monday, Wednesday and Friday. Until my next video, subscribe and press the bell notification to be notified!Slava Ukraini! Bye!
 

Russians Lost 1000 Soldiers in a Single Attack in KURSK
Huge convoy of Russian troops was sent to Kursk and they were all eliminated with HIMARS, which now can be used in Kursk. This whole truckload of troops surrendered.

That can't possibly be true, unless "lost" means killed or captured, which would be a very loose use of the word lost. And even then, there aren't enough Ukrainians to manage 1000 Russian POWs.
 
Nato was created to ensure US supremacy? Please defend. It was created to stop European countries from being conquered. We don't want any more European war. Since its inception, all euro countries invaded by Russia were non nato. You are implying that the stop US supremacy, allow Euro countries to be invaded. That makes zero sense.
The Allies just banded together against Communist Russia, US being the leader of the gang.
That they will be invaded by Russia is fiction.
Fiction? A lot changed after WWII because of the non-fiction that was European Wars. The UN and NATO were formed to not allow Europe to bring the World to the brink of madness again. Russia didn't invade is large part because of the UN and NATO. US missiles in Turkey and Russian missiles heading to Cuba didn't end in war because of the UN.
 
I know little about language, but Russian does not appearr to be a root language, certainlyy not of Ukrainian.
And? what is your fucking point here?
My point is it is looking m ore like what has been said is true, Ukraine/Kiev as a culture predates Russia/Moscow,

At the start Putin said there was never a Ukrainian culture therefore he had a right to seize Ukraine and impose Russian culture and language.

IOW justifying genocide.
 

Russians Lost 1000 Soldiers in a Single Attack in KURSK​

Huge convoy of Russian troops was sent to Kursk and they were all eliminated with HIMARS, which now can be used in Kursk. This whole truckload of troops surrendered.

That can't possibly be true, unless "lost" means killed or captured, which would be a very loose use of the word lost. And even then, there aren't enough Ukrainians to manage 1000 Russian POWs.
Prob'ly half of them were already dead and half the rest wanted to flee to Ukraine in the first place.
 

Russians Lost 1000 Soldiers in a Single Attack in KURSK​

Huge convoy of Russian troops was sent to Kursk and they were all eliminated with HIMARS, which now can be used in Kursk. This whole truckload of troops surrendered.

That can't possibly be true, unless "lost" means killed or captured, which would be a very loose use of the word lost. And even then, there aren't enough Ukrainians to manage 1000 Russian POWs.
Prob'ly half of them were already dead and half the rest wanted to flee to Ukraine in the first place.
I don't believe half the statistics coming out of the Ukraine/Russia theater. The other half I believe are outright false.
 

Russians Lost 1000 Soldiers in a Single Attack in KURSK​

Huge convoy of Russian troops was sent to Kursk and they were all eliminated with HIMARS, which now can be used in Kursk. This whole truckload of troops surrendered.

That can't possibly be true, unless "lost" means killed or captured, which would be a very loose use of the word lost. And even then, there aren't enough Ukrainians to manage 1000 Russian POWs.
There are two convoys destroyed by Himars with cluster bomb ammunition + also confrontations elsewhere.
"Lost" means killed or wounded; people that can't fight anymore or for some time. Usually military count that 1/3 are killed and 2/3 are wounded in 'normal' battle. I have no idea what the ratio is when cluster bombs are used.
In the uncensored videos of the first destroyed convoy could be seen that the trucks were full of soldiers.
 
That can't possibly be true, unless "lost" means killed or captured, which would be a very loose use of the word lost. And even then, there aren't enough Ukrainians to manage 1000 Russian POWs.
Honestly,
1000 killed, injured, captured, or a combination doesn't seem remotely out of line given the circumstances. A couple of years ago it might have, but not now.
Tom
 
According to the Ottawa Treaty, "blind" mines are prohibited in Finland.
Finland has developed a so-called "jumping mine."
It works as follows:
A spotter from the Finnish Defence Forces detects an enemy target, for example, using a drone. When the enemy is close enough, the soldier triggers the remotely controlled jumping charge.
The jumping mine rises approximately 25 meters into the air and explodes. Thousands of tungsten or steel pellets contained in the mine are then dispersed evenly over the area below.

1723488551754.png

The mine can be in the grass or snow, some 10-20 meters from a road. It will be impossible to detect.
Think that a Russian column will pass it; some Kamaz-trucks with soldiers or gasoline...
Finland has also small robot vehicles that can put the mines where they are wanted.

The idea with this is that there will not be any mines in the field that can blow up by accident.

1723488802348.png

Finland and Ukraine will work together with new weapons and weapon systems, but I do not know which ones as there are many new weapons and such under development.
 
Last edited:
That can't possibly be true, unless "lost" means killed or captured, which would be a very loose use of the word lost. And even then, there aren't enough Ukrainians to manage 1000 Russian POWs.
Honestly,
1000 killed, injured, captured, or a combination doesn't seem remotely out of line given the circumstances. A couple of years ago it might have, but not now.
Tom
In one attack? The claim is HIMARS, but is that a viable targeting platform for something that is mobile? And isn't Ukraine restricted from using it against Russian Territory?

Ukraine lies to keep hopes up. Russia lies to keep Putin from being vertically challenged. I don't trust any of it. I'm typically on a one-week delay when it comes to claims on the region.
 
I know little about language, but Russian does not appearr to be a root language, certainlyy not of Ukrainian.
And? what is your fucking point here?
My point is it is looking m ore like what has been said is true, Ukraine/Kiev as a culture predates Russia/Moscow,

At the start Putin said there was never a Ukrainian culture therefore he had a right to seize Ukraine and impose Russian culture and language.

IOW justifying genocide.

I wouldn't get too caught up with all of this arguing over which culture has historic rights to Kyiv/Kiev. The spelling difference is over whether one chooses to use Ukrainian or Russian Cyrillic as the basis for the romanized version of the name. The Ukrainian government wants their own official national language, Ukrainian, to be the basis, even though urban Kyiv is largely Russian speaking. Ukrainian tends to be more prevalent outside of the city, and that has to do with Russian dominance over Ukraine since the late 18th century. Ukrainian used to be more widely spoken throughout Ukraine in even the 19th century. Russian was imposed on the eastern portion (Novorossiya) after it was incorporated into the Russian Empire.

But it doesn't matter whether Ukrainians speak Ukrainian or Russian. Lenin did not "create Ukraine", as barbos falsely claimed. He is going by history as revised by Soviet Russian propagandists. Ukraine broke off from the Russian Empire and formed a Ukrainian republic and fought a war of independence from Russia from 1917 to 1921. It was part of the Russian civil war. Most of that republic got absorbed during the war of independence into the Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic after the Bolshevik Revolution overthrew the Kerensky government. So it became a constituent Soviet Republic within the Soviet Union. Lenin's government merely reestablished Russian imperial control. They also reabsorbed Belarus and tried to take back Polish territory. The Poles managed to expel Trotsky's Red Army during the Polish-Soviet War (1918-1921). That included much of what is now western Ukraine, much of which used to be Polish territory until Stalin shifted the territory and the demographics, creating an expanded Ukraine.

Russian and Ukrainian descend from the same roots in the territory of the Kievan/Kyivan Rus. However, the Mongol invasion destroyed that political entity, and the Muscovite region remained under Mongol hegemony for decades longer than the rest of the old Kievan Rus territory. That's when the division of the two languages really took hold. The Grand Duchy of Lithuania included Belarus, Ukraine, and some Muscovite territory. The Slavic divisions within it included White Ruthenian (Belarus), Red Ruthenia (Ukraine), and Black Ruthenia (Russian Muscovite). After the union by marriage between Poland and the Grand Duchy of Lithuania, parts of Red Ruthenia became Polish territory. Poles therefore thought they had a claim to the area that Moscow came to dominate and even once briefly put a Polish Tsar on the Russian throne. Parts of Ukraine were also considered Tatar territory, which ultimately became part of the Ottoman Empire. Poles, Turks, and Russians ended up battling each other for control of what is now modern Ukraine. Russia ultimately prevailed and absorbed all Ukrainian territory into its empire. The Ukraine that exists today, like Russia, is a product of all those ethnic rivalries in the past and stands as its own sovereign nation.
 
Last edited:
Ukraine lies to keep hopes up. Russia lies to keep Putin from being vertically challenged. I don't trust any of it. I'm typically on a one-week delay when it comes to claims on the region.
I'm totally with you on this part. "The first casualty of War is the Truth"

But given everything, the likelihood that a bunch of ill equipped and motivated Russians were being rushed haphazardly to fight seems extremely reasonable. And losses would be high under such circumstances.

I dunno.
Tom
 
Back
Top Bottom