• Welcome to the new Internet Infidels Discussion Board, formerly Talk Freethought.

How should west respond to potential (likely) Russian invasion of Ukraine?

Jimmy Higgins wrote:
"In one attack? The claim is HIMARS, but is that a viable targeting platform for something that is mobile? And isn't Ukraine restricted from using it against Russian Territory?"

The first convoy stood still. I do not know about the second one.
Using Himars - where can they be used? The signals about this have varied a lot. Anyway, Ukraine has now shown that nothing happens from the Russian side. The Red Lines are only talk.
And the US does not want to talk about this anymore. ;)
The use of ATTACMS is still a question. Everything else has been solved.
 
According to the Ottawa Treaty, "blind" mines are prohibited in Finland.
Finland has developed a so-called "jumping mine."
It works as follows:
A spotter from the Finnish Defence Forces detects an enemy target, for example, using a drone. When the enemy is close enough, the soldier triggers the remotely controlled jumping charge.
The jumping mine rises approximately 25 meters into the air and explodes. Thousands of tungsten or steel pellets contained in the mine are then dispersed evenly over the area below.

View attachment 47186

The mine can be in the grass or snow, some 10-20 meters from a road. It will be impossible to detect.
Think that a Russian column will pass it; some Kamaz-trucks with soldiers or gasoline...
Finland has also small robot vehicles that can put the mines where they are wanted.

The idea with this is that there will not be any mines in the field that can blow up by accident.

View attachment 47187

Finland and Ukraine will work together with new weapons and weapon systems, but I do not know which ones as there are many new weapons and such under development.

Finland and Ukraine are really "in the same boat" with Ukraine.
 
I look at the status of the war now as Russia having established a kind of Maginot Line to defend against Ukraine taking back its eastern and southern territories. What happened in Kursk was a bit like the German strategy in WWI and WWII, which went through Belgium to go around the French Maginot Line. However, I don't know what the strategy is other than to grab some lightly defended piece of Russian territory and hold onto it as long as possible. It poses no threat to Moscow or the vast Russian nation, and I don't see Ukraine using Kursk to try to flank Russian forces dug in and slowly advancing in eastern Ukraine. So the Maginot Line analogy doesn't quite work here, I guess.
 
I look at the status of the war now as Russia having established a kind of Maginot Line to defend against Ukraine taking back its eastern and southern territories. What happened in Kursk was a bit like the German strategy in WWI and WWII, which went through Belgium to go around the French Maginot Line. However, I don't know what the strategy is other than to grab some lightly defended piece of Russian territory and hold onto it as long as possible. It poses no threat to Moscow or the vast Russian nation, and I don't see Ukraine using Kursk to try to flank Russian forces dug in and slowly advancing in eastern Ukraine. So the Maginot Line analogy doesn't quite work here, I guess.
Here is the strategy explained:
 
Here is the strategy explained:

Excellent video. I supposed Ukraine was up to some new tactics and weaponry and looking for an opportunity to test same. They had great success and will likely be doing the same elsewhere. It forces russonazis to defend very strongly everywhere which they cannot do.
 
I know little about language, but Russian does not appearr to be a root language, certainlyy not of Ukrainian.
And? what is your fucking point here?
My point is it is looking m ore like what has been said is true, Ukraine/Kiev as a culture predates Russia/Moscow,

At the start Putin said there was never a Ukrainian culture therefore he had a right to seize Ukraine and impose Russian culture and language.

IOW justifying genocide.

I wouldn't get too caught up with all of this arguing over which culture has historic rights to Kyiv/Kiev. The spelling difference is over whether one chooses to use Ukrainian or Russian Cyrillic as the basis for the romanized version of the name. The Ukrainian government wants their own official national language, Ukrainian, to be the basis, even though urban Kyiv is largely Russian speaking. Ukrainian tends to be more prevalent outside of the city, and that has to do with Russian dominance over Ukraine since the late 18th century. Ukrainian used to be more widely spoken throughout Ukraine in even the 19th century. Russian was imposed on the eastern portion (Novorossiya) after it was incorporated into the Russian Empire.

But it doesn't matter whether Ukrainians speak Ukrainian or Russian. Lenin did not "create Ukraine", as barbos falsely claimed. He is going by history as revised by Soviet Russian propagandists. Ukraine broke off from the Russian Empire and formed a Ukrainian republic and fought a war of independence from Russia from 1917 to 1921. It was part of the Russian civil war. Most of that republic got absorbed during the war of independence into the Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic after the Bolshevik Revolution overthrew the Kerensky government. So it became a constituent Soviet Republic within the Soviet Union. Lenin's government merely reestablished Russian imperial control. They also reabsorbed Belarus and tried to take back Polish territory. The Poles managed to expel Trotsky's Red Army during the Polish-Soviet War (1918-1921). That included much of what is now western Ukraine, much of which used to be Polish territory until Stalin shifted the territory and the demographics, creating an expanded Ukraine.

Russian and Ukrainian descend from the same roots in the territory of the Kievan/Kyivan Rus. However, the Mongol invasion destroyed that political entity, and the Muscovite region remained under Mongol hegemony for decades longer than the rest of the old Kievan Rus territory. That's when the division of the two languages really took hold. The Grand Duchy of Lithuania included Belarus, Ukraine, and some Muscovite territory. The Slavic divisions within it included White Ruthenian (Belarus), Red Ruthenia (Ukraine), and Black Ruthenia (Russian Muscovite). After the union by marriage between Poland and the Grand Duchy of Lithuania, parts of Red Ruthenia became Polish territory. Poles therefore thought they had a claim to the area that Moscow came to dominate and even once briefly put a Polish Tsar on the Russian throne. Parts of Ukraine were also considered Tatar territory, which ultimately became part of the Ottoman Empire. Poles, Turks, and Russians ended up battling each other for control of what is now modern Ukraine. Russia ultimately prevailed and absorbed all Ukrainian territory into its empire. The Ukraine that exists today, like Russia, is a product of all those ethnic rivalries in the past and stands as its own sovereign nation.
I think it is important.

Israel says it has a 2000 year old god given claim to the land.
China seized Tibet claiming it was always part of China, has laid to clam all of the South China Sea, and Taiwan.

Stalin calmed all or part of Poland and Finland and made a non aggression pact with Htler in exchange for postwar land.

Historical right of conquest is what Putin uses to justify his actions.
 

Russians Lost 1000 Soldiers in a Single Attack in KURSK​

Huge convoy of Russian troops was sent to Kursk and they were all eliminated with HIMARS, which now can be used in Kursk. This whole truckload of troops surrendered.

That can't possibly be true, unless "lost" means killed or captured, which would be a very loose use of the word lost. And even then, there aren't enough Ukrainians to manage 1000 Russian POWs.
Prob'ly half of them were already dead and half the rest wanted to flee to Ukraine in the first place.
I don't believe half the statistics coming out of the Ukraine/Russia theater. The other half I believe are outright false.
I don't believe anything that is posted on YouTube, doubly so if it's accompanied by brightly coloured graphics.
 
The idea with this is that there will not be any mines in the field that can blow up by accident.
It's a big step in the right direction; But if you think that these mines will not be a hazard in the former war zone two or three decades after the conflict, then I have a bridge to sell you.

Old explosives can become highly unstable; A child playing with a twenty year old 'Jumping Mine' is not going to be safe, even if the mine has no contact detonation switch.
 
Using Himars - where can they be used? The signals about this have varied a lot.
I suspect that Ukraine has interpreted US rules as saying that targets in Russia may not be struck by HIMARS based in Ukraine, and firing across the international border.

This implied that they could be used to hit targets in occupied Ukraine, from within unoccupied Ukraine; But leaves a loophole - Nobody in the US gave much thought to the possibility of Ukrainian operated HIMARS located in Russia, hitting targets in Russia without firing across any international borders.

It's a technicality; But not one that the US wants to call them out over, particularly once faced with a fait accompli.
 
I wonder if Barbos has any biddies who could join in.
Nope. I don't want to gang up on him. But I do think that he'd be less war mongery if he had kids or grandkids or buddies who had to serve. As an aside, your perspective regarding war changes when you have kids. Life is too fucking short to send 18 and 19 year old kids into war.
 
The fact that you haven't repulsed them yet says a lot. And you were rushing people to the defense--got a convoy smashed by a missile strike. That means you were not taking care to spread out because they were in a hurry.
You are extremely quick to jump on russian fuck-ups and veeeeery slow noticing ukrainian one.
What is your point anyway? lets assume you are right, so what?
Russia must die becasue Russia is weak and incompetent? Is that it?
The point is you seem to feel it's not important and that it will be easy to throw them out. It's not a big force, the fact that you haven't done much of anything to them says an awful lot your ability to throw them out.
 
Ukraine was created as a republic in USSR by Vladimir Lenin in 1920.
Kiev is a Russian city.
This. "Ukraine was created as a republic in USSR by Vladimir Lenin in 1920.
Kiev is a Russian city."

So I assume that 1920 Lenin gathered some 768 professors to invent the Ukrainian language and culture? And all the Russians in Kiev liked the newly invented language and culture?

And
Finland became an independent country 1917, so maybe we also invented our language and culture and what not? This happened after Lenin spoke to us 1905?
Checkmate.
 
The idea with this is that there will not be any mines in the field that can blow up by accident.
It's a big step in the right direction; But if you think that these mines will not be a hazard in the former war zone two or three decades after the conflict, then I have a bridge to sell you.

Old explosives can become highly unstable; A child playing with a twenty year old 'Jumping Mine' is not going to be safe, even if the mine has no contact detonation switch.
True, but there is a big difference: Usually tens or hundreds of mines are placed somewhere, on a field or such.

In this new model, the spotter knows exactly where the mine is and monitors it. In most cases, the mine is not even deployed (e.g., along a roadside) until reconnaissance (like a drone) indicates where and from which direction the enemy is approaching. And since the mine does not need to be buried or otherwise concealed, even when it is near the enemy's route, it is significantly easier to locate afterwards if something unexpected happens.
__________________________________

Finland produce also flying drone mines:

1723516848143.png

The mine is on the bottom of the drone.

1723516974256.png

Information about the Insta Steel Eagle:

Unique concept supports active defence tactics:
  • Patented charge section and drone tested for demanding use
  • The explosive effect from above is freely adjustable according to the drone's altitude, with a 90-degree opening angle
  • The charge consists of steel or tungsten pellets
  • The regional fragmentation effect is powerful and directed downward precisely at the desired target
  • Over 3,000 dispersing fragments, impact area approx. 2,000 m²
  • Charge weight approx. 3.6 kg, range approx. 6 km
For more information: Insta Steel Product Family

_____________________________________

One more thing:
- Finland has sent some 27 "defence packages" to Ukraine.
- Finland does not tell what those packages consist of.
- Finnish companies send also prototypes for testing to Ukraine. The companies that produce "lighter weaponry" in Finland are private companies, so they can send whatever they like to Ukraine.

As I wrote before; Finland and Ukraine are in the same boat. I do not know, but I believe that Finland and Ukraine will license different products to each other. Everything will be made in order to stop Russian imperialism.


Later I will write more about Finnish weaponry systems and innovations. These are mostly connected with electronics and robotics.
 
After reading more history, as my very good friend Barbos suggested to me, I came to this conclusion:

View attachment 47184Novaja Zemlja and other northern islands can be given to some Eskimos or sell them on auction.
I actually agree. Russia should rename itself into East Ukraine (even though it's linguistically retarded)
Unite with Ukraine, and then rename itself back to Russia and move capital from ..... Kiev to Novosibirsk.
So that EU fuckers had longer flight when they go to lick Putin's boots.
 
The fact that you haven't repulsed them yet says a lot. And you were rushing people to the defense--got a convoy smashed by a missile strike. That means you were not taking care to spread out because they were in a hurry.
You are extremely quick to jump on russian fuck-ups and veeeeery slow noticing ukrainian one.
What is your point anyway? lets assume you are right, so what?
Russia must die becasue Russia is weak and incompetent? Is that it?
The point is you seem to feel it's not important and that it will be easy to throw them out. It's not a big force, the fact that you haven't done much of anything to them says an awful lot your ability to throw them out.
I don't follow you here.
 
Ukraine was created as a republic in USSR by Vladimir Lenin in 1920.
Kiev is a Russian city.
This. "Ukraine was created as a republic in USSR by Vladimir Lenin in 1920.
Kiev is a Russian city."

So I assume that 1920 Lenin gathered some 768 professors to invent the Ukrainian language and culture? And all the Russians in Kiev liked the newly invented language and culture?

And
Finland became an independent country 1917, so maybe we also invented our language and culture and what not? This happened after Lenin spoke to us 1905?
Checkmate.
Again, whaaa??
 
About a million thousand man convoy being destroyed. How many times it has to be shown to you that ukrainians lie and exaggerate. Yes, some convoy with hit. It was dumb to not spread out and I am sure people responsible for that are being questioned. But that's all we know. Ukro-regime has been lying since its inception, they are pathological liars.
 
Back
Top Bottom