• Welcome to the new Internet Infidels Discussion Board, formerly Talk Freethought.

I think we can make the positive claim that nothing like 'gods' exist

Descartes wrote apply yourself to problems that can be solved and leave the rest to the 'astrologers'. I took his use of the word astrologer to mean the pseudoscience and mysticism of the day.
Well, I study these things because I want to create more interesting games, and also create other interesting nonhuman things, perhaps people, that play games and perhaps to play games with us!

Hopefully not "global thermonuclear war".

To that end, I have to consider about "gods" and the true statements that may be said of them, else one of the true statements that may be said of me is "they are a shitty 'god', let's kill them."
To me video games and virtual reality are the same forms of escape as religion. The Matrix in some form is already developing. Peole growing up in it will be unable to distinguish reality from illusion.
Judge all you want, gotta do something with my time here.

Fundamentally, the game I play is "Self-Actualize!"

Usually I actualize myself by generating solutions for the preservation of "hoards of self", along with manicuring and curating experiences of me that I think a wide variety of interesting people will appreciate.

To build the former, I have to play other games that don't kill me forever when I lose them, so as to glean as much analogical/transferrable strategy as I may.

Oftentimes the skills I build are even meta in nature: I generate not just solutions for instances, but solutions for whole games, Algorithmic processes that solve their problem domain entirely, or at least "suitably".

It's not an escape so much as a less lethal learning experience.
 
It’s obvious the bible speaks in metaphor and in our ignorance we have lost the ability to accurately interpret those metaphors
Well, all of us except you, because you are so special and so much better than everyone else, right?

Just not in any way anyone else can recognise. Which either means you're nothing special, or that you are so special that everyone else is just too stupid to recognise it.

I bet it's hard being unrecognised for your genius, eh?
 
'relgious like' is a good metaphor for mannon religious y things.

What oiu do is between yio and your sense of ethics and morality, whatever that may be.
 
Well, all of us except you, because you are so special and so much better than everyone else
NOW you're getting smarter!
Which either means you're nothing special, or that you are so special that everyone else is just too stupid to recognise it.
Obviously #2. We should be so grateful to AGFTA for letting us know how very stupid we are, because as even the stupidest person knows, stupid people don't know they're we're stupid.
I bet it's hard being unrecognised for your genius, eh?
But now that you're getting smarter, you recognized the Genius! See how that works?
OMFG I can just feel those IQ points piling up just from being in The Presence!
If only I knew how to cash them in... maybe when I get smarter?
 
It’s obvious the bible speaks in metaphor and in our ignorance we have lost the ability to accurately interpret those metaphors
Well, all of us except you, because you are so special and so much better than everyone else, right?

Just not in any way anyone else can recognise. Which either means you're nothing special, or that you are so special that everyone else is just too stupid to recognise it.

I bet it's hard being unrecognised for your genius, eh?
I’m nothing special. As the song says. What if god was one of us?Just a slob like one of us. just a stranger on a bus trying to make his way home.
 
You are still confusing our creation in terms of something outside us.
We are a singularity (1) in a universe of nothingness (0) 10011100011
1 consciousness a singularity
Using a binary system to create the
UNI verse as a collective consciousness of our different life experiences.. to get a better full understanding of what we truly are.

That sounds very Hindu to me. Nothing new. Around 2500-3000 year old philosophy. Try reading Vedic writings it may calm you down.
They became popular in the 60s-70s with young people who rejected mainstream western-American culture.



The Vedas (/ˈveɪdəz/,[4] IAST: veda, Sanskrit: वेदः, lit. 'knowledge') are a large body of religious texts originating in ancient India. Composed in Vedic Sanskrit, the texts constitute the oldest layer of Sanskrit literature and the oldest scriptures of Hinduism.[5][6][7]

There are four Vedas: the Rigveda, the Yajurveda, the Samaveda and the Atharvaveda.[8][9] Each Veda has four subdivisions – the Samhitas (mantras and benedictions), the Aranyakas (text on rituals, ceremonies, sacrifices and symbolic-sacrifices), the Brahmanas (commentaries on rituals, ceremonies and sacrifices), and the Upanishads (texts discussing meditation, philosophy and spiritual knowledge).[8][10][11] Some scholars add a fifth category – the Upasanas (worship).[12][13] The texts of the Upanishads discuss ideas akin to the heterodox sramana-traditions.[14]

Vedas are śruti ("what is heard"),[15] distinguishing them from other religious texts, which are called smṛti ("what is remembered"). Hindus consider the Vedas to be apauruṣeya, which means "not of a man, superhuman"[16] and "impersonal, authorless,"[17][18][19] revelations of sacred sounds and texts heard by ancient sages after intense meditation.[20][21]

The Vedas have been orally transmitted since the 2nd millennium BCE with the help of elaborate mnemonic techniques.[22][23][24] The mantras, the oldest part of the Vedas, are recited in the modern age for their phonology rather than the semantics, and are considered to be "primordial rhythms of creation", preceding the forms to which they refer.[25] By reciting them the cosmos is regenerated, "by enlivening and nourishing the forms of creation at their base."[25]

The various Indian philosophies and Hindu denominations have taken differing positions on the Vedas; schools of Indian philosophy which acknowledge the primal authority of the Vedas are classified as "orthodox" (āstika).[note 2] Other śramaṇa traditions, such as Charvaka, Ajivika, Buddhism and Jainism, which did not regard the Vedas as authorities, are referred to as "heterodox" or "non-orthodox" (nāstika) schools.[14][26]


The Shrimad Bhagavad Gita (/ˌbʌɡəvəd ˈɡiːtɑː/; Sanskrit: श्रीमद्भगवद्गीता, romanized: śrīmadbhagavadgītā, lit. 'The Song by God';[a]),[1] often referred to as the Gita (IAST: gītā), is a 700-verse Hindu scripture that is part of the epic Mahabharata (chapters 23–40 of book 6 of the Mahabharata called the Bhishma Parva), dated to the second half of the first millennium BCE and is typical of the Hindu synthesis. It is considered to be one of the holy scriptures for Hinduism.

The Gita is set in a narrative framework of a dialogue between Pandava prince Arjuna and his guide and charioteer Krishna, the Supreme Personality of Godhead. At the start of the Dharma Yuddha (righteous war) between Pandavas and Kauravas, Arjuna is filled with moral dilemma and despair about the violence and death the war will cause in the battle against his own kin.[2] He wonders if he should renounce and seeks Krishna's counsel, whose answers and discourse constitute the Bhagavad Gita. Krishna counsels Arjuna to "fulfill his Kshatriya (warrior) duty to uphold the Dharma" through "selfless action".[web 1][3][note 1] The Krishna–Arjuna dialogues cover a broad range of spiritual topics, touching upon ethical dilemmas and philosophical issues that go far beyond the war Arjuna faces.[1][4][5]
Vedas are just the expression of our concepts of psychology religion philosophy.. all the different aspects of the experience of our existence.
It’s is sad that we kill in the name of Jesus .. we call those who disagree with our opinion of what’s right satanic or evil. The rapture is coming when we will finally understand the golden rule which just says.. stop being selfish and look at things from the other points of view… LOVE YOUR ENEMIES…they have been raised under different circumstances and understanding.. but we can communicate and cooperate and concede to come to a mutually beneficial solution to our differences.
My point is there is nothing realy new in what you say. You've added modern science to it without ubdestanding terms like energy. That combo is not new.

I call that New Age Mysticism.

A modern expert is Deepak Chopra. I have watched him on PBS. He is a degreed MD. He expertly weaves traditional Indian philosophy and mysticism with modern physics. Consiounesss explained as some etherall mix of the mystical and quantum mechanics. The audience is enthralled. In the 90s he claimed an earthquake was caused accidentally by his mediataing.

The difference between you and Chopra is that he actually knows science. You can learn what polished gobbledygook looks like by watching his videos. You are an amateur in comparison.

If you are going to publish you have a lot of conpetition for the New AGE market. Authors with academic credentials. Take a look at the Coast To Coast AM web site.
E=mc2
Mass is just the relationship between light and velocity… it’s not a physical thing…. Atoms protons leptons subatomic particles ARE NOT PHYSICAL.. they are a perception of electromagnetic forces. Vibrating energy angstroms decibels firing synapses.. vibrating energy perceived and labelled as mass that they are not….
Nope. The rest mas energy, the binding energy stored in the atom, is proportional to C and mass. You are putting the cart before the horse. Or the tail is wagging the dog.

Mass is a unit of measure or a dimension like meters and liters used to describe reality.

The number 2 is an abstraction with no physical reality. If I have some objects I can say I have two objects. Same with mass. I can't
get a box of kilograms but I can get a box containing 1 kilogram of potatoes.

You are mixing mysticism with simple ordinary weights and measures. The units of kilogram, meters, and seconds are te odern sytem ipof weights and measures. All civilizations had them. Time, distance, and mass/weight.

If you ar not quantifying what you are saying using established variables and units then you are doing metaohyscs and philophy or relgion. You are not talking science.

If aiss does not exist as a property of reality how do you calculate energy of a falling object vs rime? High school physics.

What conservation of energy means is this.

Fire a bullet from a gun. The total energy in Joils of te gunpowder = kniyec energy imparted to the bullet plus the heat henerated plus the mechanical losses in the gun frictions. COE says it must always add up. In any process starting energy must equall the sum of all the enrgies in the process.

It cane about with 19th century experiments with steam engines. It is not some philosophical abstraction.

You say science is all wrong but you invove comservation of energy, a foundation of science. That is called a cognitive dissonance.
Okay my apologies. For bothering you. Personally I believe our communicating is in and of itself proof of our consciousness. I think therefore I exist coupled with our definition of creator as “god”, makes my case quite clearly and simply. Obviously not.
That's the thing. I'm a fucking shitheel when it comes to universes I create, half the time. And I acknowledge that something akin to a universe is possible without a shitheel like me doing it, with a shitheel that is "blind, random absurd circumstances of an infinite normal field".
As a final note, you are just a character in a fictional story trying to explain your existence.i think therefore I am.
But that realization simply caused a BIG BANG explosion of unanswerable questions..
What am I? Where how when why?
Our existence began as an attempt to answer those questions.
Realizing there were no answers, we created answers to give our existence a purpose and meaning. To make our boring lonely existence as a singularity a more enjoyable experience.
Since only our consciousness existed we had to use it to create this universe.
(1) I exist in a universe of
(0) nothingness
100111000111 that’s all I needed to create this universe as a perception of vibrating energy
Color’s angstroms vibrating energy
Sounds decibels vibrating energy
Thoughts firing synapses vibrating energy
I think therefore I am.. everything else is a creation and communication of my conscious singularity vibrating.. 100111000111
If you can’t “get it” from that explanation you simply are not ready … You can’t handle the truth……yet….
Actually I have no need to explain my existence.

More of the same mythology-pseudoscience. You obviously do not grasp even high school level physics. The Binary thing is clever, I'll gove you that but still nonsense.

Good luck on your journey, in your mind you can trip anywher and crte yiur own special universe.

My infinite pointless loop detector is sounding, so it is off to ignore for yiu.
It’s called circular reasoning. We created the god that created us to explain our existence because we are too ignorant to know why where what when or how we know we exist.
 
You are still confusing our creation in terms of something outside us.
We are a singularity (1) in a universe of nothingness (0) 10011100011
1 consciousness a singularity
Using a binary system to create the
UNI verse as a collective consciousness of our different life experiences.. to get a better full understanding of what we truly are.

That sounds very Hindu to me. Nothing new. Around 2500-3000 year old philosophy. Try reading Vedic writings it may calm you down.
They became popular in the 60s-70s with young people who rejected mainstream western-American culture.



The Vedas (/ˈveɪdəz/,[4] IAST: veda, Sanskrit: वेदः, lit. 'knowledge') are a large body of religious texts originating in ancient India. Composed in Vedic Sanskrit, the texts constitute the oldest layer of Sanskrit literature and the oldest scriptures of Hinduism.[5][6][7]

There are four Vedas: the Rigveda, the Yajurveda, the Samaveda and the Atharvaveda.[8][9] Each Veda has four subdivisions – the Samhitas (mantras and benedictions), the Aranyakas (text on rituals, ceremonies, sacrifices and symbolic-sacrifices), the Brahmanas (commentaries on rituals, ceremonies and sacrifices), and the Upanishads (texts discussing meditation, philosophy and spiritual knowledge).[8][10][11] Some scholars add a fifth category – the Upasanas (worship).[12][13] The texts of the Upanishads discuss ideas akin to the heterodox sramana-traditions.[14]

Vedas are śruti ("what is heard"),[15] distinguishing them from other religious texts, which are called smṛti ("what is remembered"). Hindus consider the Vedas to be apauruṣeya, which means "not of a man, superhuman"[16] and "impersonal, authorless,"[17][18][19] revelations of sacred sounds and texts heard by ancient sages after intense meditation.[20][21]

The Vedas have been orally transmitted since the 2nd millennium BCE with the help of elaborate mnemonic techniques.[22][23][24] The mantras, the oldest part of the Vedas, are recited in the modern age for their phonology rather than the semantics, and are considered to be "primordial rhythms of creation", preceding the forms to which they refer.[25] By reciting them the cosmos is regenerated, "by enlivening and nourishing the forms of creation at their base."[25]

The various Indian philosophies and Hindu denominations have taken differing positions on the Vedas; schools of Indian philosophy which acknowledge the primal authority of the Vedas are classified as "orthodox" (āstika).[note 2] Other śramaṇa traditions, such as Charvaka, Ajivika, Buddhism and Jainism, which did not regard the Vedas as authorities, are referred to as "heterodox" or "non-orthodox" (nāstika) schools.[14][26]


The Shrimad Bhagavad Gita (/ˌbʌɡəvəd ˈɡiːtɑː/; Sanskrit: श्रीमद्भगवद्गीता, romanized: śrīmadbhagavadgītā, lit. 'The Song by God';[a]),[1] often referred to as the Gita (IAST: gītā), is a 700-verse Hindu scripture that is part of the epic Mahabharata (chapters 23–40 of book 6 of the Mahabharata called the Bhishma Parva), dated to the second half of the first millennium BCE and is typical of the Hindu synthesis. It is considered to be one of the holy scriptures for Hinduism.

The Gita is set in a narrative framework of a dialogue between Pandava prince Arjuna and his guide and charioteer Krishna, the Supreme Personality of Godhead. At the start of the Dharma Yuddha (righteous war) between Pandavas and Kauravas, Arjuna is filled with moral dilemma and despair about the violence and death the war will cause in the battle against his own kin.[2] He wonders if he should renounce and seeks Krishna's counsel, whose answers and discourse constitute the Bhagavad Gita. Krishna counsels Arjuna to "fulfill his Kshatriya (warrior) duty to uphold the Dharma" through "selfless action".[web 1][3][note 1] The Krishna–Arjuna dialogues cover a broad range of spiritual topics, touching upon ethical dilemmas and philosophical issues that go far beyond the war Arjuna faces.[1][4][5]
Vedas are just the expression of our concepts of psychology religion philosophy.. all the different aspects of the experience of our existence.
It’s is sad that we kill in the name of Jesus .. we call those who disagree with our opinion of what’s right satanic or evil. The rapture is coming when we will finally understand the golden rule which just says.. stop being selfish and look at things from the other points of view… LOVE YOUR ENEMIES…they have been raised under different circumstances and understanding.. but we can communicate and cooperate and concede to come to a mutually beneficial solution to our differences.
My point is there is nothing realy new in what you say. You've added modern science to it without ubdestanding terms like energy. That combo is not new.

I call that New Age Mysticism.

A modern expert is Deepak Chopra. I have watched him on PBS. He is a degreed MD. He expertly weaves traditional Indian philosophy and mysticism with modern physics. Consiounesss explained as some etherall mix of the mystical and quantum mechanics. The audience is enthralled. In the 90s he claimed an earthquake was caused accidentally by his mediataing.

The difference between you and Chopra is that he actually knows science. You can learn what polished gobbledygook looks like by watching his videos. You are an amateur in comparison.

If you are going to publish you have a lot of conpetition for the New AGE market. Authors with academic credentials. Take a look at the Coast To Coast AM web site.
E=mc2
Mass is just the relationship between light and velocity… it’s not a physical thing…. Atoms protons leptons subatomic particles ARE NOT PHYSICAL.. they are a perception of electromagnetic forces. Vibrating energy angstroms decibels firing synapses.. vibrating energy perceived and labelled as mass that they are not….
Nope. The rest mas energy, the binding energy stored in the atom, is proportional to C and mass. You are putting the cart before the horse. Or the tail is wagging the dog.

Mass is a unit of measure or a dimension like meters and liters used to describe reality.

The number 2 is an abstraction with no physical reality. If I have some objects I can say I have two objects. Same with mass. I can't
get a box of kilograms but I can get a box containing 1 kilogram of potatoes.

You are mixing mysticism with simple ordinary weights and measures. The units of kilogram, meters, and seconds are te odern sytem ipof weights and measures. All civilizations had them. Time, distance, and mass/weight.

If you ar not quantifying what you are saying using established variables and units then you are doing metaohyscs and philophy or relgion. You are not talking science.

If aiss does not exist as a property of reality how do you calculate energy of a falling object vs rime? High school physics.

What conservation of energy means is this.

Fire a bullet from a gun. The total energy in Joils of te gunpowder = kniyec energy imparted to the bullet plus the heat henerated plus the mechanical losses in the gun frictions. COE says it must always add up. In any process starting energy must equall the sum of all the enrgies in the process.

It cane about with 19th century experiments with steam engines. It is not some philosophical abstraction.

You say science is all wrong but you invove comservation of energy, a foundation of science. That is called a cognitive dissonance.
Okay my apologies. For bothering you. Personally I believe our communicating is in and of itself proof of our consciousness. I think therefore I exist coupled with our definition of creator as “god”, makes my case quite clearly and simply. Obviously not.
That's the thing. I'm a fucking shitheel when it comes to universes I create, half the time. And I acknowledge that something akin to a universe is possible without a shitheel like me doing it, with a shitheel that is "blind, random absurd circumstances of an infinite normal field".
As a final note, you are just a character in a fictional story trying to explain your existence.i think therefore I am.
But that realization simply caused a BIG BANG explosion of unanswerable questions..
What am I? Where how when why?
Our existence began as an attempt to answer those questions.
Realizing there were no answers, we created answers to give our existence a purpose and meaning. To make our boring lonely existence as a singularity a more enjoyable experience.
Since only our consciousness existed we had to use it to create this universe.
(1) I exist in a universe of
(0) nothingness
100111000111 that’s all I needed to create this universe as a perception of vibrating energy
Color’s angstroms vibrating energy
Sounds decibels vibrating energy
Thoughts firing synapses vibrating energy
I think therefore I am.. everything else is a creation and communication of my conscious singularity vibrating.. 100111000111
If you can’t “get it” from that explanation you simply are not ready … You can’t handle the truth……yet….
Actually I have no need to explain my existence.

More of the same mythology-pseudoscience. You obviously do not grasp even high school level physics. The Binary thing is clever, I'll gove you that but still nonsense.

Good luck on your journey, in your mind you can trip anywher and crte yiur own special universe.

My infinite pointless loop detector is sounding, so it is off to ignore for yiu.
It’s called circular reasoning. We created the god that created us to explain our existence because we are too ignorant to know why where what when or how we know we exist.
Circular reasoning is a well known implication of a system of axioms which declares the truth of it's axioms: it can "prove any sentence" and so is NONSENSE.
 
It’s obvious the bible speaks in metaphor and in our ignorance we have lost the ability to accurately interpret those metaphors
Well, all of us except you, because you are so special and so much better than everyone else, right?

Just not in any way anyone else can recognise. Which either means you're nothing special, or that you are so special that everyone else is just too stupid to recognise it.

I bet it's hard being unrecognised for your genius, eh?
I’m nothing special. As the song says. What if god was one of us?Just a slob like one of us. just a stranger on a bus trying to make his way home.
You're nothing special, just a God who knows Eric Bazilian songs, but doesn't know basic physics.

Obviously, popular music lyrics are more rigorous than the scientific method, obviously. 🙄

And "I'm nothing special, just a God" is the height of humility and self abasement. 🙄

If I roll my eyes any harder, I will be able to see my brain.
 
It’s obvious the bible speaks in metaphor and in our ignorance we have lost the ability to accurately interpret those metaphors
Well, all of us except you, because you are so special and so much better than everyone else, right?

Just not in any way anyone else can recognise. Which either means you're nothing special, or that you are so special that everyone else is just too stupid to recognise it.

I bet it's hard being unrecognised for your genius, eh?
I’m nothing special. As the song says. What if god was one of us?Just a slob like one of us. just a stranger on a bus trying to make his way home.
You're nothing special, just a God who knows Eric Bazilian songs, but doesn't know basic physics.

Obviously, popular music lyrics are more rigorous than the scientific method, obviously. 🙄

And "I'm nothing special, just a God" is the height of humility and self abasement. 🙄

If I roll my eyes any harder, I will be able to see my brain.
"Don't tell anyone, you don't want that kind of attention".

If the dude wants us to care, then they need to get off their ass, halt the simulation/say the safe word/whatever, and sort out Putin with a goddamn heart attack already.

Don't give a shit about the story arc or your timeline, I want a snooze button on that GD apocalypse already.

If they can't get on that shit, they can shove off and shut up about it, because nobody fucking cares.
 
@bilby

To be fair, if I knew there was a safe-word, I think I would say it, but I'm not exactly sure?

There are a lot of complicated thoughts that swirl in my head as I contemplate that.

I know, personally, I have spent so much time loving all of this, and taking the time to figure it out, and learning all these things about love and family and friendship and the burdens of living.

All this pain, and everything else in the context of it, brings me such joy! And that would all feel so much less if I were ripped out of it, as out of a pleasant dream, never to be able to return to the innocence of not being god of it all without living a whole new life into it?

It's a hard ask. But ultimately one that if there was a God, they would have some responsibility to answer.
 
Holding down the ctl alt keys while pulling on our right ear will pause the simulation.

Be sure to save yourself and back yourslf up before pausing the simulation.
 
Holding down the ctl alt keys while pulling on our right ear will pause the simulation.

Be sure to save yourself and back yourslf up before pausing the simulation.
Well, who knows, really. It's an interesting dilemma to think about in fiction.
 
Holding down the ctl alt keys while pulling on our right ear will pause the simulation.

Be sure to save yourself and back yourslf up before pausing the simulation.
Well, who knows, really. It's an interesting dilemma to think about in fiction.
Up there with 'Am I in a coma dreaming?'.
 
Holding down the ctl alt keys while pulling on our right ear will pause the simulation.

Be sure to save yourself and back yourslf up before pausing the simulation.
Well, who knows, really. It's an interesting dilemma to think about in fiction.
Up there with 'Am I in a coma dreaming?'.
So, "am I dreaming" is a pretty useful one. Nightmares just never really get all that bad for me anymore, on account of knowing how to ask that question effectively.

The other becomes useful for considering discipline in actual safe-word play.

It's also yet another reason why I tend to believe there is no good god, and we are most certainly not them: the absence of the safe-word.
 
It’s obvious the bible speaks in metaphor and in our ignorance we have lost the ability to accurately interpret those metaphors
Well, all of us except you, because you are so special and so much better than everyone else, right?

Just not in any way anyone else can recognise. Which either means you're nothing special, or that you are so special that everyone else is just too stupid to recognise it.

I bet it's hard being unrecognised for your genius, eh?
I’m nothing special. As the song says. What if god was one of us?Just a slob like one of us. just a stranger on a bus trying to make his way home.
You're nothing special, just a God who knows Eric Bazilian songs, but doesn't know basic physics.

Obviously, popular music lyrics are more rigorous than the scientific method, obviously. 🙄

And "I'm nothing special, just a God" is the height of humility and self abasement. 🙄

If I roll my eyes any harder, I will be able to see my brain.
"Don't tell anyone, you don't want that kind of attention".

If the dude wants us to care, then they need to get off their ass, halt the simulation/say the safe word/whatever, and sort out Putin with a goddamn heart attack already.

Don't give a shit about the story arc or your timeline, I want a snooze button on that GD apocalypse already.

If they can't get on that shit, they can shove off and shut up about it, because nobody fucking cares.
We create our own existence.
We can do good and create love peace happiness..by loving others
Or we can be negative argue and selfishly demand others do what we want…
That stupid book the bible says love truth and right.. do not kill steal or harm othe
But we use religion to scare people to force them to do what we want.
That was and is not the intent of bible.
And it even says so in the bible.
 
It’s obvious the bible speaks in metaphor and in our ignorance we have lost the ability to accurately interpret those metaphors
Well, all of us except you, because you are so special and so much better than everyone else, right?

Just not in any way anyone else can recognise. Which either means you're nothing special, or that you are so special that everyone else is just too stupid to recognise it.

I bet it's hard being unrecognised for your genius, eh?
I’m nothing special. As the song says. What if god was one of us?Just a slob like one of us. just a stranger on a bus trying to make his way home.
You're nothing special, just a God who knows Eric Bazilian songs, but doesn't know basic physics.

Obviously, popular music lyrics are more rigorous than the scientific method, obviously. 🙄

And "I'm nothing special, just a God" is the height of humility and self abasement. 🙄

If I roll my eyes any harder, I will be able to see my brain.
If it makes you happy to (focus on the negative and criticize people and insult them and be unhappy), … then be unhappy…
 
You are still confusing our creation in terms of something outside us.
We are a singularity (1) in a universe of nothingness (0) 10011100011
1 consciousness a singularity
Using a binary system to create the
UNI verse as a collective consciousness of our different life experiences.. to get a better full understanding of what we truly are.

That sounds very Hindu to me. Nothing new. Around 2500-3000 year old philosophy. Try reading Vedic writings it may calm you down.
They became popular in the 60s-70s with young people who rejected mainstream western-American culture.



The Vedas (/ˈveɪdəz/,[4] IAST: veda, Sanskrit: वेदः, lit. 'knowledge') are a large body of religious texts originating in ancient India. Composed in Vedic Sanskrit, the texts constitute the oldest layer of Sanskrit literature and the oldest scriptures of Hinduism.[5][6][7]

There are four Vedas: the Rigveda, the Yajurveda, the Samaveda and the Atharvaveda.[8][9] Each Veda has four subdivisions – the Samhitas (mantras and benedictions), the Aranyakas (text on rituals, ceremonies, sacrifices and symbolic-sacrifices), the Brahmanas (commentaries on rituals, ceremonies and sacrifices), and the Upanishads (texts discussing meditation, philosophy and spiritual knowledge).[8][10][11] Some scholars add a fifth category – the Upasanas (worship).[12][13] The texts of the Upanishads discuss ideas akin to the heterodox sramana-traditions.[14]

Vedas are śruti ("what is heard"),[15] distinguishing them from other religious texts, which are called smṛti ("what is remembered"). Hindus consider the Vedas to be apauruṣeya, which means "not of a man, superhuman"[16] and "impersonal, authorless,"[17][18][19] revelations of sacred sounds and texts heard by ancient sages after intense meditation.[20][21]

The Vedas have been orally transmitted since the 2nd millennium BCE with the help of elaborate mnemonic techniques.[22][23][24] The mantras, the oldest part of the Vedas, are recited in the modern age for their phonology rather than the semantics, and are considered to be "primordial rhythms of creation", preceding the forms to which they refer.[25] By reciting them the cosmos is regenerated, "by enlivening and nourishing the forms of creation at their base."[25]

The various Indian philosophies and Hindu denominations have taken differing positions on the Vedas; schools of Indian philosophy which acknowledge the primal authority of the Vedas are classified as "orthodox" (āstika).[note 2] Other śramaṇa traditions, such as Charvaka, Ajivika, Buddhism and Jainism, which did not regard the Vedas as authorities, are referred to as "heterodox" or "non-orthodox" (nāstika) schools.[14][26]


The Shrimad Bhagavad Gita (/ˌbʌɡəvəd ˈɡiːtɑː/; Sanskrit: श्रीमद्भगवद्गीता, romanized: śrīmadbhagavadgītā, lit. 'The Song by God';[a]),[1] often referred to as the Gita (IAST: gītā), is a 700-verse Hindu scripture that is part of the epic Mahabharata (chapters 23–40 of book 6 of the Mahabharata called the Bhishma Parva), dated to the second half of the first millennium BCE and is typical of the Hindu synthesis. It is considered to be one of the holy scriptures for Hinduism.

The Gita is set in a narrative framework of a dialogue between Pandava prince Arjuna and his guide and charioteer Krishna, the Supreme Personality of Godhead. At the start of the Dharma Yuddha (righteous war) between Pandavas and Kauravas, Arjuna is filled with moral dilemma and despair about the violence and death the war will cause in the battle against his own kin.[2] He wonders if he should renounce and seeks Krishna's counsel, whose answers and discourse constitute the Bhagavad Gita. Krishna counsels Arjuna to "fulfill his Kshatriya (warrior) duty to uphold the Dharma" through "selfless action".[web 1][3][note 1] The Krishna–Arjuna dialogues cover a broad range of spiritual topics, touching upon ethical dilemmas and philosophical issues that go far beyond the war Arjuna faces.[1][4][5]
Vedas are just the expression of our concepts of psychology religion philosophy.. all the different aspects of the experience of our existence.
It’s is sad that we kill in the name of Jesus .. we call those who disagree with our opinion of what’s right satanic or evil. The rapture is coming when we will finally understand the golden rule which just says.. stop being selfish and look at things from the other points of view… LOVE YOUR ENEMIES…they have been raised under different circumstances and understanding.. but we can communicate and cooperate and concede to come to a mutually beneficial solution to our differences.
My point is there is nothing realy new in what you say. You've added modern science to it without ubdestanding terms like energy. That combo is not new.

I call that New Age Mysticism.

A modern expert is Deepak Chopra. I have watched him on PBS. He is a degreed MD. He expertly weaves traditional Indian philosophy and mysticism with modern physics. Consiounesss explained as some etherall mix of the mystical and quantum mechanics. The audience is enthralled. In the 90s he claimed an earthquake was caused accidentally by his mediataing.

The difference between you and Chopra is that he actually knows science. You can learn what polished gobbledygook looks like by watching his videos. You are an amateur in comparison.

If you are going to publish you have a lot of conpetition for the New AGE market. Authors with academic credentials. Take a look at the Coast To Coast AM web site.
E=mc2
Mass is just the relationship between light and velocity… it’s not a physical thing…. Atoms protons leptons subatomic particles ARE NOT PHYSICAL.. they are a perception of electromagnetic forces. Vibrating energy angstroms decibels firing synapses.. vibrating energy perceived and labelled as mass that they are not….
Nope. The rest mas energy, the binding energy stored in the atom, is proportional to C and mass. You are putting the cart before the horse. Or the tail is wagging the dog.

Mass is a unit of measure or a dimension like meters and liters used to describe reality.

The number 2 is an abstraction with no physical reality. If I have some objects I can say I have two objects. Same with mass. I can't
get a box of kilograms but I can get a box containing 1 kilogram of potatoes.

You are mixing mysticism with simple ordinary weights and measures. The units of kilogram, meters, and seconds are te odern sytem ipof weights and measures. All civilizations had them. Time, distance, and mass/weight.

If you ar not quantifying what you are saying using established variables and units then you are doing metaohyscs and philophy or relgion. You are not talking science.

If aiss does not exist as a property of reality how do you calculate energy of a falling object vs rime? High school physics.

What conservation of energy means is this.

Fire a bullet from a gun. The total energy in Joils of te gunpowder = kniyec energy imparted to the bullet plus the heat henerated plus the mechanical losses in the gun frictions. COE says it must always add up. In any process starting energy must equall the sum of all the enrgies in the process.

It cane about with 19th century experiments with steam engines. It is not some philosophical abstraction.

You say science is all wrong but you invove comservation of energy, a foundation of science. That is called a cognitive dissonance.
Okay my apologies. For bothering you. Personally I believe our communicating is in and of itself proof of our consciousness. I think therefore I exist coupled with our definition of creator as “god”, makes my case quite clearly and simply. Obviously not.
That's the thing. I'm a fucking shitheel when it comes to universes I create, half the time. And I acknowledge that something akin to a universe is possible without a shitheel like me doing it, with a shitheel that is "blind, random absurd circumstances of an infinite normal field".
As a final note, you are just a character in a fictional story trying to explain your existence.i think therefore I am.
But that realization simply caused a BIG BANG explosion of unanswerable questions..
What am I? Where how when why?
Our existence began as an attempt to answer those questions.
Realizing there were no answers, we created answers to give our existence a purpose and meaning. To make our boring lonely existence as a singularity a more enjoyable experience.
Since only our consciousness existed we had to use it to create this universe.
(1) I exist in a universe of
(0) nothingness
100111000111 that’s all I needed to create this universe as a perception of vibrating energy
Color’s angstroms vibrating energy
Sounds decibels vibrating energy
Thoughts firing synapses vibrating energy
I think therefore I am.. everything else is a creation and communication of my conscious singularity vibrating.. 100111000111
If you can’t “get it” from that explanation you simply are not ready … You can’t handle the truth……yet….
Actually I have no need to explain my existence.

More of the same mythology-pseudoscience. You obviously do not grasp even high school level physics. The Binary thing is clever, I'll gove you that but still nonsense.

Good luck on your journey, in your mind you can trip anywher and crte yiur own special universe.

My infinite pointless loop detector is sounding, so it is off to ignore for yiu.
It’s called circular reasoning. We created the god that created us to explain our existence because we are too ignorant to know why where what when or how we know we exist.
Circular reasoning is a well known implication of a system of axioms which declares the truth of it's axioms: it can "prove any sentence" and so is NONSENSE.
Using the word axioms does not change the FACT. That we create our own existence good/god or bad. 1 or 0 1000111000.
Positive or not positive.
Our choices as the bible says in hundreds of metaphors..” can you understand what a metaphor is???”Joshua 24:15... choose this day whom you will serve, whether the gods your fathers served in the region beyond the River, (anger hate fear war)or the gods of the Amorites in whose land you dwell. But as for me and my house, we will serve the LORD.( peace love kindness empathy ) as INXS put it ..”
Yeah, you got to have faith
In each other
All you ever, all you ever
Have for each other

They give us a reason
To go on living
It's all in the choices
That you have to make

I got to tell you
You better make them good
I got to tell you
 
@bilby

To be fair, if I knew there was a safe-word, I think I would say it, but I'm not exactly sure?

There are a lot of complicated thoughts that swirl in my head as I contemplate that.

I know, personally, I have spent so much time loving all of this, and taking the time to figure it out, and learning all these things about love and family and friendship and the burdens of living.

All this pain, and everything else in the context of it, brings me such joy! And that would all feel so much less if I were ripped out of it, as out of a pleasant dream, never to be able to return to the innocence of not being god of it all without living a whole new life into it?

It's a hard ask. But ultimately one that if there was a God, they would have some responsibility to answer.
You still don’t get it.. the bible and Rene Descartes told us who god is two words “I AM” literally I can quote from either source.
The entire knowledge of our existence is expressed in two numbers 10001110000
A single conscious creator (1) in a universe of nothingness (0) vibrating to create the sounds sights thoughts decibels angstroms firing synapses… all just VIBRATING ENERGY that we use to create this existence.. why???
Because being a singularity consciousness in a universe of nothingness for an eternity (energy cannot be created or destroyed) is not a pleasant experience so WE CREATED the god that created us to make our existence a more enjoyable experience..
Any questions about the purpose of life I got answers from the realization that “I AM” 1 vibrating to create an eternity of meaning and purpose for our existence 1000111000
 
When "I can be as a function of (a bunch of neurons being arranged into a specific graph structure)", then being cannot be said to be singular or unique.

I accept the symmetry of others. You cannot love your neighbor as yourself, in fact, until you do.

Assuming you are "god, top of the food chain" and they are not is the very first step away from loving your neighbor as yourself.

Using circular reasoning and invoking contradictory thought is not going to make any friends here, nor is calling yourself god.

As it is, my general policy on gods is "please either apologize profusely and clean up the messes you made, or fuck off into exile forever lest we come back with whatever weapons we may invent so to fuck you off, or perhaps shove your avatar into a box somewhere so it can't bother us anymore"

i offer the same greeting to gods who can't get their shit together and love their neighbors as themselves as I do kings: not worship, but a sword.
 
Back
Top Bottom