Immigrant Concentration Camps

[fast]

You do realize that her view does not mean he was an illegitimate asylum seeker either.
That is not an ad hom.
I am for unrestricted mass migration as much as you are for the mass murders of these immigrants.

Immigrants? What happened to calling them refugees?

I don’t know how anyone keeps terms straight anymore. Oh, and the term “undocumented” takes the cake. I’m looking for left wing liberal Democrats to call burglars unwanted shoppers anytime now.

 

[Jolly_Penguin]

You do realize that her view does not mean he was an illegitimate asylum seeker either.
That is not an ad hom.
I am for unrestricted mass migration as much as you are for the mass murders of these immigrants.

Immigrants? What happened to calling them refugees?

I don’t know how anyone keeps terms straight anymore. Oh, and the term “undocumented” takes the cake. I’m looking for left wing liberal Democrats to call burglars unwanted shoppers anytime now.

Undocumented entrants makes descriptive sense. That's what they are. Or how about unvetted entrants?

 

[Jolly_Penguin]

Had Jesus Christ existed today, right-wingers would condemn him as a dirty, filthy socialist. And Bonespurs would have nothing to do with him except make up a juvenile, stupid nickname for him.

Cosmic Zombie Man is fake news. Sad.

 

[Don2 (Don1 Revised)]

Hates the Troops. Boring Loser. Very low energy.

 

[Loren Pechtel]

Allegations against Kavanaugh were never meaningfully investigated. The Republicans either don't want to know the truth or know he's guilty and don't care.

There were numerous hearings.
But how do you think it could be "meaningfully" investigated? It's something that supposedly happened over 30 years ago and the accuser can't even remember exactly where. How is any evidence supposed to be collected? It can't be done.

Hearings do little to dig up facts. The actual investigation was severely crippled by the Republicans. No meaningful effort was made to figure out if he actually did it or not. Such a failure is insanity given that some of her statements were verified.

 

[Loren Pechtel]

Allegations against Kavanaugh were never meaningfully investigated. The Republicans either don't want to know the truth or know he's guilty and don't care.

There were numerous hearings.
But how do you think it could be "meaningfully" investigated? It's something that supposedly happened over 30 years ago and the accuser can't remember exactly where. How is any evidence supposed to be collected? It can't be done.

Well for starters, Mark Judge should be interviewed under oath. Because without that, there is no meaningful investigation.

Dr. Ford testified under oath. Kavanaugh's calendars place him at a party within the right time frame and his yearbook buffoonery indicates that yeah, he was that kind of guy who'd sexually assault a 15 year old in front of his friend for laughs. Also, his explanation of what being a 'Renate Alumnus' means indicates he's a liar. There was more than enough justification for compelling Judge to testify during the confirmation hearings no matter how much he wanted to stay at that motel in Dewey Beach.

And she partially described a part of the house that she saw once decades ago. Unless she was planning on framing him decades later that basically proves that something of great emotional impact happened at that party.

 

[Jolly_Penguin]

And she partially described a part of the house that she saw once decades ago. Unless she was planning on framing him decades later that basically proves that something of great emotional impact happened at that party.

I disagree. I can partially describe a part of houses I have been to once decades ago which had zero emotional impact happen there. Some people just have good cognitive maps and memories for physical spaces. She may be one of them.

I do agree with Arctish that Judge should have been examined under oath though. Why wasn't he?

 

[Jarhyn]

And she partially described a part of the house that she saw once decades ago. Unless she was planning on framing him decades later that basically proves that something of great emotional impact happened at that party.

I disagree. I can partially describe a part of houses I have been to once decades ago which had zero emotional impact happen there. Some people just have good cognitive maps and memories for physical spaces. She may be one of them.

I do agree with Arctish that Judge should have been examined under oath though. Why wasn't he?

Except that Kav claimed he had never known her, interacted with her, or met her in that timeframe, and that there was no such gathering.

 

[Derec]

You do realize that her view does not mean he was an illegitimate asylum seeker either.

Shifting goal posts.

First it was: she did not say it.
When shown that she did say it --> Well, what does she know.

She knows much better why her son, who lived with her, decided to migrate, than you do. You are just trying to hang on to the fiction that Oscar somehow might not have been an asylum scammer.

I am for unrestricted mass migration as much as you are for the mass murders of these immigrants.

Wrong. You support policies like letting migrants into the country (rather than keeping them out or detaining them) and oppose deportations of most, if not all, illegals. That amounts to de facto open borders.

 

[angelo]

Had the Trumpet appointed Jesus Christ himself [ were he to exist at the present time] the Trump haters would condem the decision, and try to dig up dirt on him!

You have it backwards. The only reason Kavanaugh was even considered for the Supreme Court was the Republicans' incessant obstruction of Merrick Garland. You might want to check your history and facts.

The history of that is in this link...................................https://www.npr.org/2018/06/29/6244...errick-garland-in-2016-and-why-it-matters-now

 

[angelo]

Well for starters, Mark Judge should be interviewed under oath. Because without that, there is no meaningful investigation.

Dr. Ford testified under oath. Kavanaugh's calendars place him at a party within the right time frame and his yearbook buffoonery indicates that yeah, he was that kind of guy who'd sexually assault a 15 year old in front of his friend for laughs. Also, his explanation of what being a 'Renate Alumnus' means indicates he's a liar. There was more than enough justification for compelling Judge to testify during the confirmation hearings no matter how much he wanted to stay at that motel in Dewey Beach.

Had the Trumpet appointed Jesus Christ himself [ were he to exist at the present time] the Trump haters would condem the decision, and try to dig up dirt on him!

Had Jesus Christ existed today, right-wingers would condemn him as a dirty, filthy socialist. And Bonespurs would have nothing to do with him except make up a juvenile, stupid nickname for him.

Perhaps I should have said Indira Gandhi or Nelson Mandela or someone else besides JC? The point was that no matter who Trump nominated he/she was going to be rejected by the Dems.

 

[Jarhyn]

Had Jesus Christ existed today, right-wingers would condemn him as a dirty, filthy socialist. And Bonespurs would have nothing to do with him except make up a juvenile, stupid nickname for him.

Perhaps I should have said Indira Gandhi or Nelson Mandela or someone else besides JC? The point was that no matter who Trump nominated he/she was going to be rejected by the Dems.

Disproof of a statement required a single counterexample. The fact that you provided the counterexample in the original quote means you should just quit trying to sling that bullshit.

I think Drumpf would be perfectly fine appointing a racist like Ghandi*, though.

And after all the suspicious appointments, there's an obligation to do some digging: he has an unbroken track record for appointing criminals, grifters, rapists, and charlatans.

If someone always lies, and they said for example, that "Angelo is an honest and intelligent person" one day, what would that imply about you?

Edit: @ Half-Life and Angelo: if Trump tomorrow proposed that all legal citizens needed to register to get a mark or brand of citizenship in some prominent place on their body so as to make identifying non-citizens immediate and trivial, how would you feel about this plan?

*if he wasn't brown himself

 

[Patooka]

Had the Trumpet appointed Jesus Christ himself [ were he to exist at the present time] the Trump haters would condem the decision, and try to dig up dirt on him!

You have it backwards. The only reason Kavanaugh was even considered for the Supreme Court was the Republicans' incessant obstruction of Merrick Garland. You might want to check your history and facts.

The history of that is in this link...................................https://www.npr.org/2018/06/29/6244...errick-garland-in-2016-and-why-it-matters-now

Soo...we are in agreement then. The only reason Kavanaugh was even considered for the US Supreme Court is because the Republicans obstructed Obama's decision, even if Obama were to appoint Jesus Christ himself, as you put it.

Glad we cleared that up.

Perhaps I should have said Indira Gandhi or Nelson Mandela or someone else besides JC? The point was that no matter who Trump nominated he/she was going to be rejected by the Dems.

Mainly because by Mitch McConnell's own standards, The position Brett Kavanaugh filled should not have existed in the first place, had the US Republican Party even a shred of integrity.

 

[angelo]

Had Jesus Christ existed today, right-wingers would condemn him as a dirty, filthy socialist. And Bonespurs would have nothing to do with him except make up a juvenile, stupid nickname for him.

Perhaps I should have said Indira Gandhi or Nelson Mandela or someone else besides JC? The point was that no matter who Trump nominated he/she was going to be rejected by the Dems.

Disproof of a statement required a single counterexample. The fact that you provided the counterexample in the original quote means you should just quit trying to sling that bullshit.

I think Drumpf would be perfectly fine appointing a racist like Ghandi*, though.

And after all the suspicious appointments, there's an obligation to do some digging: he has an unbroken track record for appointing criminals, grifters, rapists, and charlatans.

If someone always lies, and they said for example, that "Angelo is an honest and intelligent person" one day, what would that imply about you?

Edit: @ Half-Life and Angelo: if Trump tomorrow proposed that all legal citizens needed to register to get a mark or brand of citizenship in some prominent place on their body so as to make identifying non-citizens immediate and trivial, how would you feel about this plan?

*if he wasn't brown himself

Has Trump ever proposed, or even thought about such a nonsecal proposal!

 

[Jarhyn]

Disproof of a statement required a single counterexample. The fact that you provided the counterexample in the original quote means you should just quit trying to sling that bullshit.

I think Drumpf would be perfectly fine appointing a racist like Ghandi*, though.

And after all the suspicious appointments, there's an obligation to do some digging: he has an unbroken track record for appointing criminals, grifters, rapists, and charlatans.

If someone always lies, and they said for example, that "Angelo is an honest and intelligent person" one day, what would that imply about you?

Edit: @ Half-Life and Angelo: if Trump tomorrow proposed that all legal citizens needed to register to get a mark or brand of citizenship in some prominent place on their body so as to make identifying non-citizens immediate and trivial, how would you feel about this plan?

*if he wasn't brown himself

Has Trump ever proposed, or even thought about such a nonsecal proposal!

I noticed you didn't answer the question...

Edit: hell, you didn't answer either question...

 

[Jimmy Higgins]

Had Jesus Christ existed today, right-wingers would condemn him as a dirty, filthy socialist. And Bonespurs would have nothing to do with him except make up a juvenile, stupid nickname for him.

Perhaps I should have said Indira Gandhi or Nelson Mandela or someone else besides JC? The point was that no matter who Trump nominated he/she was going to be rejected by the Dems.

Gorsuch got on the Supreme Court and only the GOP obstructed a SCOTUS nomination by a Democrat from even having a hearing. The GOP didn't vote down Garland... he was never even allowed in the room!

 

[Jolly_Penguin]

I find it hard to imagine somebody who literally always lies. I don't think they could be a functional human being.

 

[Jarhyn]

I find it hard to imagine somebody who literally always lies. I don't think they could be a functional human being.

Yet we elected one as president.

 

[Jimmy Higgins]

I find it hard to imagine somebody who literally always lies. I don't think they could be a functional human being.

It helps inheriting a lot of money and having lots of lawyers and crafty accountants. Also, being an alpha male helps.

 

[ZiprHead]

I find it hard to imagine somebody who literally always lies. I don't think they could be a functional human being.

Trump makes 13 false claims in Cabinet meeting