Derec
Contributor
3. I have no criminal record.
So you prefer to be called an undocumented criminal.
Does the Left ever tire of ad hominems?
3. I have no criminal record.
So you prefer to be called an undocumented criminal.
There were numerous hearings.Allegations against Kavanaugh were never meaningfully investigated. The Republicans either don't want to know the truth or know he's guilty and don't care.
Coming from someone who holds onto the bigoted and simplistic "rapeugee" and "fakefugee" narrative that breaks the irony meters throughout the internetz.
That is especially true if no one even bothers to investigate.There were numerous hearings.Allegations against Kavanaugh were never meaningfully investigated. The Republicans either don't want to know the truth or know he's guilty and don't care.
But how do you think it could be "meaningfully" investigated? It's something that supposedly happened over 30 years ago and the accuser can't remember exactly where. How is any evidence supposed to be collected? It can't be done.
3. I have no criminal record.
So you prefer to be called an undocumented criminal.
Does the Left ever tire of ad hominems?
That is especially true if no one even bothers to investigate.
There were numerous hearings.Allegations against Kavanaugh were never meaningfully investigated. The Republicans either don't want to know the truth or know he's guilty and don't care.
But how do you think it could be "meaningfully" investigated? It's something that supposedly happened over 30 years ago and the accuser can't remember exactly where. How is any evidence supposed to be collected? It can't be done.
Ad hominem is about arguing the person, not the argument. Which is what you are doing now. Which is what your side is always doing when you are losing the argument. It's getting tiresome, you need to update your playlist. Even Frikki got tired of obsessing over it after a while. I suggest you do too.There is no ad hom. You are an undocumented criminal.
Wrong. I am a citizen. Have been a citizen for 15 years. First election I voted in was the 2004 primary.Come to think of it, you're also an alien.
They entered the country illegally. I did not.Yet here you are pointing the finger at aliens who end up in detention centers because, like you, they have an interest in themselves (or their family) above the law.
BS. Asylum is for those fleeing persecution. Masses of people claiming asylum fraudulently is the latest scam by those facilitating illegal migration. It's an abuse of the asylum system.But in the case of asylum seekers, there's no comparison. They are trying to enter the country legally but get stuck in more-or-less a prison where you could be, if you weren't so lucky.
For what purpose? Are you arguing that because I sometimes see sex workers I should welcome open borders and mass migrations of millions of Central Americans into US?you could try to put yourself in Hispanic shoes
Is being "the kind of guy who'd" considered evidence all of a sudden?yeah, he was that kind of guy who'd sexually assault a 15 year old in front of his friend for laughs.
Wrong. I am a citizen. Have been a citizen for 15 years. First election I voted in was the 2004 primary.
Derec said:And again, we should argue the issues, not posters around here.
As usual, you are very wrong.The family did not admit that he and his wife ONLY fled El Salavador to make more money.
‘I Didn’t Want Them to Go’: Salvadoran Family Grieves for Father and Daughter Who DrownedNY Times said:“I didn’t want them to go,” Ms. Ramírez, Mr. Martínez’s mother, said this week in an interview at the small, two-bedroom rowhouse that she shared with her son and his family. “But they didn’t take my advice.”
It remains unclear how the Martínez family intended to argue their case for asylum, or whether they even understood the legal basis for gaining such protection. Mr. Martínez’s wife, Ms. Ávalos, did not respond to requests for an interview.
But Ms. Ramírez repeatedly said that her son and his family were not fleeing persecution or the threat of it — requirements for gaining asylum in the United States.
They migrated “only because of the economic situation,” she said. “Lamentably, the salaries here are very little and they aren’t enough,” she added, speaking softly.
More irrelevant ad hominems I see. How about we get back on topic, which is your support for illegal aliens and unrestricted mass migration.And anyone who admits serial law breaking is a real criminal by definition, regardless of their view of the validity of the law(s) they break.
You do realize that her view does not mean he was an illegitimate asylum seeker either.But even if she had not admitted it, it would not mean that he was a legitimate asylum seeker.
That is not an ad hom.More irrelevant ad hominems I see.And anyone who admits serial law breaking is a real criminal by definition, regardless of their view of the validity of the law(s) they break.
I am for unrestricted mass migration as much as you are for the mass murders of these immigrants.How about we get back on topic, which is your support for illegal aliens and unrestricted mass migration.
Is being "the kind of guy who'd" considered evidence all of a sudden?yeah, he was that kind of guy who'd sexually assault a 15 year old in front of his friend for laughs.
It was over 30 years ago. It's all unprovable at this point and they were all minors at the time anyway. The Left should just let it go.
I forgot some of the details (except "I like beer" which was a classic!), but wasn't there some issue about Ford being caught in a lie about why there was a second entrance to her house or something?
Also, why are we discussing Kavenaugh on this thread? That's not an El Salvadoran name.![]()
Half-Life, why are you so obsessed with the supposed depravity of Muslim immigrants? What would you say if a woman had gotten gang-raped by a bunch of white frat boys?Do you think the woman who was gang raped is sitting back and going, "Well, it was bound to happen because some Muslim immigrants are bad ones?"
There were numerous hearings.Allegations against Kavanaugh were never meaningfully investigated. The Republicans either don't want to know the truth or know he's guilty and don't care.
But how do you think it could be "meaningfully" investigated? It's something that supposedly happened over 30 years ago and the accuser can't remember exactly where. How is any evidence supposed to be collected? It can't be done.
Well for starters, Mark Judge should be interviewed under oath. Because without that, there is no meaningful investigation.
Dr. Ford testified under oath. Kavanaugh's calendars place him at a party within the right time frame and his yearbook buffoonery indicates that yeah, he was that kind of guy who'd sexually assault a 15 year old in front of his friend for laughs. Also, his explanation of what being a 'Renate Alumnus' means indicates he's a liar. There was more than enough justification for compelling Judge to testify during the confirmation hearings no matter how much he wanted to stay at that motel in Dewey Beach.
You do realize that her view does not mean he was an illegitimate asylum seeker either.
That is not an ad hom.More irrelevant ad hominems I see.
I am for unrestricted mass migration as much as you are for the mass murders of these immigrants.How about we get back on topic, which is your support for illegal aliens and unrestricted mass migration.
Had the Trumpet appointed Jesus Christ himself [ were he to exist at the present time] the Trump haters would condem the decision, and try to dig up dirt on him!
Damn fucking straight we would have!Well for starters, Mark Judge should be interviewed under oath. Because without that, there is no meaningful investigation.
Dr. Ford testified under oath. Kavanaugh's calendars place him at a party within the right time frame and his yearbook buffoonery indicates that yeah, he was that kind of guy who'd sexually assault a 15 year old in front of his friend for laughs. Also, his explanation of what being a 'Renate Alumnus' means indicates he's a liar. There was more than enough justification for compelling Judge to testify during the confirmation hearings no matter how much he wanted to stay at that motel in Dewey Beach.
Had the Trumpet appointed Jesus Christ himself [ were he to exist at the present time] the Trump haters would condem the decision, and try to dig up dirt on him!
Had the Trumpet appointed Jesus Christ himself [ were he to exist at the present time] the Trump haters would condem the decision, and try to dig up dirt on him!
You have it backwards. The only reason Kavanaugh was even considered for the Supreme Court was the Republicans' incessant obstruction of Merrick Garland. You might want to check your history and facts.
Well for starters, Mark Judge should be interviewed under oath. Because without that, there is no meaningful investigation.
Dr. Ford testified under oath. Kavanaugh's calendars place him at a party within the right time frame and his yearbook buffoonery indicates that yeah, he was that kind of guy who'd sexually assault a 15 year old in front of his friend for laughs. Also, his explanation of what being a 'Renate Alumnus' means indicates he's a liar. There was more than enough justification for compelling Judge to testify during the confirmation hearings no matter how much he wanted to stay at that motel in Dewey Beach.
Had the Trumpet appointed Jesus Christ himself [ were he to exist at the present time] the Trump haters would condem the decision, and try to dig up dirt on him!