Immigration Issues

[GenesisNemesis]

So how is this supposed to "protect America", exactly?

ICE will stop reporting deaths of newly released detainees

The policy, issued during the Biden administration, directed the agency to review and report all detainee fatalities, including those that occurred post-release.

abcnews.com

 

[Toni]

So how is this supposed to "protect America", exactly?

ICE will stop reporting deaths of newly released detainees

The policy, issued during the Biden administration, directed the agency to review and report all detainee fatalities, including those that occurred post-release.

abcnews.com

So our little fee fees don’t get all hurts and make us feel bad about holding people in concentration camps that some of our forebears died trying to liberate.

 

[bilby]

Protecting the USA from the risk of a successful World Cup

This is absurd. People have had their travel approved; Bought tickets and accommodation, and (now that it's too late to get refunds) have had their travel approvals suspended or cancelled without any clear reason, nor any viable path to appeal.

His Esta was revoked this week. He was told no reason would be given and it could be a mistake or random.

He applied for a visa but was initially offered an appointment after the tournament. With help from the embassy, it was moved forward, leaving him a “50-50 chance” of making his flight.

The US has for decades been unwelcoming to tourists. Which is their choice; But if you don't want to welcome visitors (with money to spend) from around the world, why bid to host the World Cup? And why fuck people about? If you have grounds to refuse an Esta (or don't have sufficient information to be sure), then don't issue one. If you do issue one, you need a very good reason to then withdraw it again - if you have the slightest interest in attracting tourists to your country.

 

[GenesisNemesis]

So you don't think anyone should know about deaths of detainees, TSwizzle?

 

[Emily Lake]

Deaths of detainees, sure. Deaths of people released from detention? Not sure why you'd want that.

 

[GenesisNemesis]

Deaths of detainees, sure. Deaths of people released from detention? Not sure why you'd want that.

You could simply, I dunno, Google stuff.

 

[scombrid]

Guess I was under a rock. DOGE put in fake death dates in the SSA death master files for people over 150 years old to get them officially dead, even though none of them was receiving any benefit. There was just no record of their official death.

How does that apply to immigration? Well that was a test to see if they could lust administratively “kill” somebody.

DHS came in shortly after that an unalived 6,000 people, most of whom were legal but DHS decided needed gone anyway and figured that a SSA death would make them leave. They just went into the SSA systems and put in a fake death.

They followed that with a list of 2.7 million names of “violent criminals and terrorists” that they demanded that SSA enter fake death dates. Fortunately that bigger list is snagged.

You people are some serious disingenuous assholes.

 

[Jarhyn]

Guess I was under a rock. DOGE put in fake death dates in the SSA death master files for people over 150 years old to get them officially dead, even though none of them was receiving any benefit. There was just no record of their official death.

How does that apply to immigration? Well that was a test to see if they could lust administratively “kill” somebody.

DHS came in shortly after that an unalived 6,000 people, most of whom were legal but DHS decided needed gone anyway and figured that a SSA death would make them leave. They just went into the SSA systems and put in a fake death.

They followed that with a list of 2.7 million names of “violent criminals and terrorists” that they demanded that SSA enter fake death dates. Fortunately that bigger list is snagged.

You people are some serious disingenuous assholes.

Don't worry. I'm sure some seriously deranged asshole will be by shortly to tell us how WE are the deranged assholes for calling them deranged assholes.

 

[Don2 (Don1 Revised)]

Sorry I am coming in late, but won't faking death dates make it difficult to determine if the govt murdered someone?

 

[Jarhyn]

Sorry I am coming in late, but won't faking death dates make it difficult to determine if the govt murdered someone?

Indeed it would...

It's almost like they have some intent to disappear the names behind those social security numbers for some reason.

 

[Jarhyn]

They followed that with a list of 2.7 million names of “violent criminals and terrorists” that they demanded that SSA enter fake death dates. Fortunately that bigger list is snagged.

Is the list public?

 

[ZiprHead]

If they are in the SS system they are most likely here legally which means they are targeting legal immigrants.

 

[Jarhyn]

If they are in the SS system they are most likely here legally which means they are targeting legal immigrants.

I am now wondering, given that this is almost 1% of the entire country's population, if a good deal of non-immigrant birthright citizens are on that list.

There almost assuredly are a number of such names.

 

[scombrid]

They followed that with a list of 2.7 million names of “violent criminals and terrorists” that they demanded that SSA enter fake death dates. Fortunately that bigger list is snagged.

Is the list public?

I don’t know. It was in a story on This American Life this week. The 6,000 list this got media attention last year when the unalived people started showing up at SSA offices to get themselves off the list and they all had the same arbitrary fake death date. The 2.7 million list was a new revelation and the person bringing it forward quit the SSA after DHS tried to ram that one through with malicious intent. He has filed a whistleblower complaint in Congress but I don’t know where that stands. The whistleblower was credible and he seems to have receipts. He is also very procedural and protective of sensitive information so running this through official channels.

 

[scombrid]

Just did a web search. Big media is picking up this story subsequent to TAL reporting.

 

[Loren Pechtel]

But I used to think that respect for and fair enforcement of federal law was something all reasonable people agreed on.

Untill federal 'law' became unreasonable.

Which part of the federal law with respect to immigration do you feel is unreasonable?

Well, some of us have a problem with the obvious AI hunt for "criminals". Absolutely rigged towards false positives, accusation or even association = guilty, deport without due process.

And how about the thousands of legal immigrants they declared dead. They wanted to do the same thing to millions.

You incorrectly get into the Social Security death index, you have a lot of headaches.

 

[Loren Pechtel]

Let's start with a very basic premise: Are local law enforcement and local government in sanctuary cities cooperating with federal law with respect to immigration? What is the premise of a sanctuary city in the first place?

The premise is harm reduction.

By letting illegals associate with the government without being deported you get things like licensed, insured drivers vs unlicensed people who will hit and run.

Or look at the drug business--a lack of legal recourse for misdeeds means it's much more violent than it otherwise would be.

 

[Loren Pechtel]

David J. Bier, the director of immigration studies at the Cato Institute, described the policy as “illogical” in a blog post laying out potential far-reaching and cascading impacts of the rule.

https://www.cnn.com/2026/05/22/politics/green-card-seekers-leave-us-apply

Note the absolutely damning bit:

It will force them to apply at consulates where the doctrine of consular nonreviewability protects any denial from judicial review, and there is no administrative appeals process.

In other words, only the right color people need apply.

 

[Loren Pechtel]

A blog from the Libertarian Cato Institute on why the above change for green card applicants is stupid, cruel and bad for the US and bad for the applicants. There is nothing good about this change unless you are Steven Miller and want to just plain stop immigration.

https://www.cato.org/blog/dhs-quits-granting-green-cards-almost-entirely?utm_source=social&utm_medium=x&utm_campaign=Cato%20Social%20Share

That seems like a remarkably stupid, short-sighted, and vindictive change to the laws.

I suppose if the intent is to make it much, much harder to immigrate, this is a way to get that done. But it seems horribly unfair to people who already came here with an understanding of the rules as they were. Are those people grandfathered in?

Now do you understand why we have a problem with the federal laws??

And, remember, there is no appeal to a counselor decision rejecting allowing you to enter the US. You leave, think you'll be allowed back by the current administration?