Elixir
Made in America
Lindsey "Windsock" Graham said:"I don’t want to eat our own.”
Your own WHAT? You've been lapping up Trump's shit for so long that you can't account for that taste in your mouth.
Lindsey "Windsock" Graham said:"I don’t want to eat our own.”
Allegedly inciting a crowd is not conspiracy. The Complaint says there was a "unified plan" but gives no facts to support that. There is no factual allegation whatsoever in the Complaint that Trump or his Campaign knowingly or intentionally agreed with others to break into the Capital building and stop the vote counting. You kinda need that if you charge - as the congress member does - a conspiracy by Trump and others to stop Congress from counting the electoral votes.
LOL at Trausti hanging his hat on the complaint not having the words "intent" or "knowingly" in it to show that it is nearly as incompetent as Trump's lawyers, then when ZiprHead posts part of the complaint with that says "The insurrection at the Capital was a direct, intended, and foreseeable result of the Defendents' unlawful conspiracy." He retreats to a position that the complaint contains no facts to support it, despite the fact that it has already been explained to Trausti, who I believe at least claims to be a lawyer, that complaints don't generally include the evidence to be presented at the trial, and his subsequent admission that complaints only need to allege facts, which this one does in spades.
Where will you move those goalposts to next, Trausti?
They own Trump, and they now own January 6.
No they don't. They rewrote Iraq in 2008. They rewrote McCain in 2012. They are currently rewriting Romney. Believe me, in 4-8 years, the narrative will be "Trump wasn't a true Republican, he was deep state trying to destroy the party from the inside."
And it will be said by Republicans even crazier and more fascistic than Trump without any irony or self awareness whatsoever.
They own Trump, and they now own January 6.
No they don't. They rewrote Iraq in 2008. They rewrote McCain in 2012. They are currently rewriting Romney. Believe me, in 4-8 years, the narrative will be "Trump wasn't a true Republican, he was deep state trying to destroy the party from the inside."
And it will be said by Republicans even crazier and more fascistic than Trump without any irony or self awareness whatsoever.
but how are they going to do that with any electoral success unless they detach a few million of Trump's supporters/cultists from his (un)holy body? And how is the Republican party going to do that ?
Allegedly inciting a crowd is not conspiracy. The Complaint says there was a "unified plan" but gives no facts to support that. There is no factual allegation whatsoever in the Complaint that Trump or his Campaign knowingly or intentionally agreed with others to break into the Capital building and stop the vote counting. You kinda need that if you charge - as the congress member does - a conspiracy by Trump and others to stop Congress from counting the electoral votes.
'Sounds like?'You complained about the lack of "intent" or "knowingly". Word #9 of his screenshot is "intended"--that sounds suspiciously like "intent" to me.
This is why they need to do another impeachment, they muffed up the second one by not calling witnesses.
It’s unlikely they would ever have been able to get the witnesses who actually had the most pertinent information.If we have a third impeachment, we can this time call witnesses. That was the big problem with impeachment two. It was way too hurried.
It’s unlikely they would ever have been able to get the witnesses who actually had the most pertinent information.If we have a third impeachment, we can this time call witnesses. That was the big problem with impeachment two. It was way too hurried.
Remember, they’re still litigating McGahn’s subpoena from the last time.
That doesn’t prove anything. They’re already saying that, practically.It’s unlikely they would ever have been able to get the witnesses who actually had the most pertinent information.If we have a third impeachment, we can this time call witnesses. That was the big problem with impeachment two. It was way too hurried.
Remember, they’re still litigating McGahn’s subpoena from the last time.
If the subpoena those individuals identified in the Capitol Protest, they can interview them one by one until they find one willing to say that Trump urged them to do it.
With enough of them saying that under oath, perhaps a majority of Senators might actually vote to convict. But it will take a considerable amount of pressure, where that many witnesses becomes too much of a burden to ignore.