No, I do NOT make everything about gender. YOU and many men find Sanders more appealing.
You claim people who prefer Bernie over EW do that because Bernie is a man. But you reject that you might prefer EW because she is a woman. Can you not countenance that like you, people have other reasons to prefer one over the other? Or does everybody disagreeing with you have bad motives automatically?
Btw, I do not find Bernie's policies any more appealing than EW's. But on a personal level he is much more likable.
I find him exactly the opposite. I think he's a bombastic old man who wags his finger as he scolds and lectures, shouts and sprays spittle whenever he talks.
Bombastic is a good way to describe him! Lecturing though I would ascribe more to EW. And whenever she lectures or scolds she sounds like she is talking to children, not adults.
The finger wagging scolding and shouting are the epitome of school marm, at least if it's a woman who does it. If it's a man, he's a saint and wise and funny.
Shouting is not the epitome of a schoolmarm. Scolding is, which is what EW does when she is not lecturing.
The moniker schoolmarm is gendered, but not the trope. Strict, scolding male teachers are also a thing, both in reality and in fiction. But Bernie does not really fit that mold.
I don't see Warren as better than Sanders because she's a woman and he's a man. I think that many people like Sanders and enjoy or excuse his behavior (shouting, finger wagging, scolding, spittle) because he's a man: a crotchety old grandpa. And I think that many of those same people who see Warren as too much of a wonk do so because she's female. In 2016, Grandpas were cool and grandmas were not, at least in some circles.
That is the thing. You say you prefer EW for reasons other than her gender, and I take you at your word. Can you not extend the same to those who prefer Bernie over EW? Why assume the like for Bernie is "because he's a man" and dislike EW "because she's female".
Nice snake you included. I love it when Sanders <Removed> include that whenever they talk about Warren.
Nice personal insult! (I read it before it was removed)
I included the snake because snake emojis became an online phenomenon (including #WarrenIsASnake hashtag) after the episode where EW attacked Bernie during a debate over her claim that he allegedly told her that a woman could not win.
It was another episode from the tumultuous 2020 primary season that ended with such a disappointingly conventional nominee.
Shows their true colors. Apparently Sanders did try to talk her into dropping out, saying that a woman couldn't win.
That was her claim. He denied it. In the end, ...
What an ugly thing to write.
They certainly disregard it whenever it is convenient to them and maintaining their special treatment.
Pairs nicely with your allusion to the belief that NA people crossed the Siberian peninsula
Siberian peninsula? You mean the Bering land bridge?
And I mean, they did cross it. Even if some will insist they were created
de novo in North America, contrary to all scientific evidence.
and so aren't really 'American'
When did I say that?
and have no more claim to the Americas than the Europeans who came after. It's always interesting when an atheist embraces manifest destiny so fiercely.
I do not think Amerinds should have any more or less rights than any other US citizen. I also think that tribal sovereignty is incompatible with US citizenship as it creates two classes of citizens.
I'm fairly certain that the proportion of Native Americans who do not believe in DNA (whatever you mean by that statement) is roughly the same as the proportion of white people or black people or Hispanic people who don't believe in DNA.
I do not have numbers on that, but it would be an interesting thing to find out.
