Jimmy Higgins
Contributor
- Joined
- Jan 31, 2001
- Messages
- 46,902
- Basic Beliefs
- Calvinistic Atheist
Hearsay is telling someone what you heard someone else say.Conclusions drawn from direct observation and recorded events are not "hearsay". That does not mean they are necessarily valid, but anyone can certainly conclude that someone has a mental illness or is mentally unbalanced.New Yorker Magazine has just published an interview with film maker Eric Holder. Who states that towards the end of his filming as January 6 approached, Trump became utterly irrational. It was impossible to have a coherent conversation with Trump. Who would believe every lie Trump told.
In short, Trump is indeed mentally ill. Holder has been deposed by the January 6 committee, subpeoned by Georgia and maybe others. Holder has stated lately he has been collecting subpeonas.
Until Trump has been diagnosed by a licensed psychiatrist, that's hearsay.
So how exactly do they go about proving their observation is valid? To my knowledge when validation is missing, it's hearsay.
A movie maker saying Trump is mentally ill would be an unqualified diagnosis, not hearsay.