Talk about missing the whole main point!
No, I am not. The point is the hypocrisy on the left. Your Ilk gets outraged over things "Heels Up Kamala" but rejoice at "haha he has a mushroom dick".
To make the, well, main point let's stipulate for now that the philandering sins of Bill C. and Donnie T. were equivalent. Bill was impeached for his sins, while Trump's crimes, sins and faults were so numerous that anyone focused on his sexual assaults would have been accused of ... missing the main point.
The treatment Clinton got was pretty bad too. You will never see me defending Republicans there.
Clinton's team lost the election of 2000 with many Blueshirts staying home or pulling the Bush lever out of disgust for Bill's philandering.
Clinton did not run in 2000 - he was term limited. It was his protégé Al Gore who lost, albeit very narrowly, in the electoral college.
I see no evidence that it was Clinton's BJ that caused him to lose. Clinton was still very popular in 2000.
Gore lost because a) he was not a very good candidate, b) the far left voted for Ralph Nader (because ) and c) some idiots down in Broward County could not figure out how to work the ballots.
Donnie's team idolizes their predator: His bragging about sexual assaults is just "locker talk."
It seems like locker room talk, yes. It was blown out of proportion.
There is plenty to criticize Trump for without hyperbole over that leaked tape.
Donnie brags about his lust for daughter Ivanka.
That is weird, yes.
Did Bill lust for Chelsea?
Of course not, but then again, she is no Ivanka.
The Ilk Derec supports treated Bill's philandering as the greatest crime since the St. Valentine's Day massacre, or since the time Abe Lincoln -- (did you know he was Republican? Not many do) -- freed the slaves.
No, contrary to your repeated libelous statements, I do not support that "Ilk".
The impeachment over the Monica Lewinski affair was ridiculous.
The very same Ilk screams at Trump's opponents to Shut Up. He never had sex with that woman, she's not his type (despite being the spitting image of his ex-wife Marla), and the sex with her wasn't any good anyway.
We can all agree that Trump is lying about not having had sex with Stormy.
At the same time, this prosecution is political. The same district attorney who likes to downgrade robberies to misdemeanors is now using "novel legal theories" in order to prosecute a political enemy.
Knife-wielding suspect has felony charge reduced under Manhattan DA Alvin Bragg’s policies
To listen to the Ilk the consensual blowjob was the biggest calamity to befall the Republic between Pearl Harbor and the Benghazi Massacre. Even the most ardent anti-Licker thinks it hardly worth the bother to add perjury or rape to the 95 indictments against the Orange Sociopath.
There are strong cases against Trump, like the documents case. I think the salacious Stormy Daniels case is going to help him politically more than it's going to hurt him. And since I am a Trump opponent, I do not like that one bit.
The gap in civility, sense of duty, and especially simple honesty between most prominent Blues and most prominent Reds is absolutely too blatant to miss. Assuming, again, that you are being honest in the sentence I've reddened I admit to being absolutely flabbergasted. Somehow your brain has a subconscious filter that introduces huge bias.