hurtinbuckaroo
Contributor
Dup .
Trump is dumber than a box of rocks and more delusional than any of us might imagine.
He will likely convince himself that he can WIN in court, his SCOTUS picks will protect him etc.
Only once he is incarcerated and no lawyer shows up to offer him a new way out, might he realize anything about the gravity of his situation.
From all accounts so far leaked, he is very aware off camera that his on camera clowning isn't working.
He did another Cabinet boot licking?From all accounts so far leaked, he is very aware off camera that his on camera clowning isn't working.
?
Really? Did you watch yesterday's "Cabinet Meeting"? If he knew it wasn't working, why would he offer up yet another heaping serving of self-aggrandizing bullshit?
He did another Cabinet boot licking?From all accounts so far leaked, he is very aware off camera that his on camera clowning isn't working.
?
Really? Did you watch yesterday's "Cabinet Meeting"? If he knew it wasn't working, why would he offer up yet another heaping serving of self-aggrandizing bullshit?
From all accounts so far leaked, he is very aware off camera that his on camera clowning isn't working.
?
Really? Did you watch yesterday's "Cabinet Meeting"? If he knew it wasn't working, why would he offer up yet another heaping serving of self-aggrandizing bullshit?
From all accounts so far leaked, he is very aware off camera that his on camera clowning isn't working.
?
Really? Did you watch yesterday's "Cabinet Meeting"? If he knew it wasn't working, why would he offer up yet another heaping serving of self-aggrandizing bullshit?
He has no other schtick to present. That doesn't mean he's not aware it's not working.
By "not working" I mean among the people that matter, not among his idiotic base. They don't matter. They have never mattered (other than to him as an audience starved D-list celebrity). They only make up about 5% (if that) of all Americans and only about 10-15% of his voting bloc.
What mattered to Republican Senators was the swing and what happened to the House in 2018 and what will in turn happen to them in 2020 if they are still affiliated in any way with Trump. His backing has become toxic. And, again, that is NOW--before the real shit show begins. But that doesn't mean he can just change his on-camera persona 180 degrees.
Doubling down on humiliating the very people that are about to stab him in the back is likewise a time-honored tradition. Indeed, the fact that he's doubling down only serves to further prove--imo--that he knows damn well who will be shiving him in the end. He's getting his last licks in before the axe falls.
And if by some miracle he really is so mentally impaired as to not see any of the writing on the wall to take the last possible out before his head gets chopped off (and yes, I concede, it's a possibility), then more than likely it will be as I (and others) pointed out long ago; the insistence of his family (Ivanka, primarily) that he take a deal.
But, hey, if he doesn't, it just means more carnival for the rest of us. Frankly, I hope he takes the deal so that the adults can all get back to work and we can finally put this idiotic shitshow to bed. There are many lives at stake in all of this, not just a figurative danse macabre.
He's fucking ruined, and his only real path forward is to seize control of every aspect of government while he still has a chance to do so.
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/manafo...mpaign-communications-with-russian-operative/Attorneys for Paul Manafort, former Trump campaign chairman, submitted a poorly redacted filing on Tuesday revealing that Manafort shared polling data with a Russian operative during the campaign. Special counsel Robert Mueller submitted a filing in November accusing Manafort of breaching his plea agreement with the special counsel's office by lying to federal investigators.
The special counsel said in a memo describing Manafort's alleged wrongdoing in December that Manafort's lies to federal investigators were not simply "memory lapses."
According to that memo, Manafort lied about several things in breach of his plea deal, including his contact with Konstantin Kilimnik, who ran Manafort's office in Kiev. Kilimnik, who has ties to Russian intelligence, was indicted in June. Much of the information about Kilimnik was redacted in the filing, although Manafort admitted he conspired with Kilimnik to obstruct justice.
In their response on Tuesday, Manafort's attorneys inadvertently revealed that the special counsel alleges Manafort "lied about sharing polling data with Mr. Kilimnik related to the 2016 presidential campaign."
Manafort's attorneys argue in the filing that he had answered the special counsel's questions truthfully to the best of his ability, but that his work on Ukrainian political events and of the alleged information sharing with Kilimnik "simply were not at the forefront of Mr. Manafort's mind during the period at issue." His attorneys added that "it is not surprising at all that Mr. Manafort was unable to recall specific details prior to having his recollection refreshed."
https://www.latimes.com/politics/la-na-pol-court-mystery-mueller-20190108-story.htmlThe Supreme Court refused Tuesday to block a subpoena issued to an unnamed corporation, owned by a foreign government, ending a mystery dispute in the courts reportedly involving the investigation into Russian election meddling.
The outcome is believed to be a victory for special counsel Robert S. Mueller III, who is seeking to learn about the flow of foreign money that may have played a role in the 2016 campaign.
But most of the details of the dispute, including the name of the foreign country, remain unknown.
Like other federal investigations, Mueller presented evidence to a grand jury, and by law, the proceedings of the grand jury are kept secret to shield people who are innocent of wrongdoing.
Eventually, but not automatically when it happens. It depends on the investigation, and how sensitive they deem it to both national security, and their investigation. That's my understanding of the 'maybes', but I'm not a lawyer.https://www.latimes.com/politics/la-na-pol-court-mystery-mueller-20190108-story.htmlThe Supreme Court refused Tuesday to block a subpoena issued to an unnamed corporation, owned by a foreign government, ending a mystery dispute in the courts reportedly involving the investigation into Russian election meddling.
The outcome is believed to be a victory for special counsel Robert S. Mueller III, who is seeking to learn about the flow of foreign money that may have played a role in the 2016 campaign.
But most of the details of the dispute, including the name of the foreign country, remain unknown.
Like other federal investigations, Mueller presented evidence to a grand jury, and by law, the proceedings of the grand jury are kept secret to shield people who are innocent of wrongdoing.
So if there is an indictment, we will find out what this mystery corporation is?
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/manafo...mpaign-communications-with-russian-operative/Attorneys for Paul Manafort, former Trump campaign chairman, submitted a poorly redacted filing on Tuesday revealing that Manafort shared polling data with a Russian operative during the campaign. Special counsel Robert Mueller submitted a filing in November accusing Manafort of breaching his plea agreement with the special counsel's office by lying to federal investigators.
The special counsel said in a memo describing Manafort's alleged wrongdoing in December that Manafort's lies to federal investigators were not simply "memory lapses."
According to that memo, Manafort lied about several things in breach of his plea deal, including his contact with Konstantin Kilimnik, who ran Manafort's office in Kiev. Kilimnik, who has ties to Russian intelligence, was indicted in June. Much of the information about Kilimnik was redacted in the filing, although Manafort admitted he conspired with Kilimnik to obstruct justice.
In their response on Tuesday, Manafort's attorneys inadvertently revealed that the special counsel alleges Manafort "lied about sharing polling data with Mr. Kilimnik related to the 2016 presidential campaign."
Manafort's attorneys argue in the filing that he had answered the special counsel's questions truthfully to the best of his ability, but that his work on Ukrainian political events and of the alleged information sharing with Kilimnik "simply were not at the forefront of Mr. Manafort's mind during the period at issue." His attorneys added that "it is not surprising at all that Mr. Manafort was unable to recall specific details prior to having his recollection refreshed."
Hmmm....so his contact with Russians was a decade ago, huh?
Don's link said:"lied about sharing polling data with Mr. Kilimnik related to the 2016 presidential campaign."
ETA: That isn't to just dismiss the remote possibility that Trump will come out of this unscathed, at least directly. His "mentor" was Roy Cohen, ffs and the people--the sycophants--that suckerfished him are adept at making sure nothing leads directly up the chain, so it is obviously never outside the realm of possibilities that Mueller ends up inadvertently exonerating Trump. Doubtful in all that we've seen so far, but there is, of course, a significant difference between what we believe to be true and what can be proven in a court of law. So there is that.
Bringing this over from another thread because I want to comment on it.
ETA: That isn't to just dismiss the remote possibility that Trump will come out of this unscathed, at least directly. His "mentor" was Roy Cohen, ffs and the people--the sycophants--that suckerfished him are adept at making sure nothing leads directly up the chain, so it is obviously never outside the realm of possibilities that Mueller ends up inadvertently exonerating Trump. Doubtful in all that we've seen so far, but there is, of course, a significant difference between what we believe to be true and what can be proven in a court of law. So there is that.
This seems to indicate that you're beginning to lay the groundwork for backing out of many of those super obvious things you have been claiming Trump and company are definitely guilty of. You use the word "inadvertently" in regards to Mueller's findings and yet the argument here has been that Mueller is taking so long to wrap up because he is maticulously dotting those i's and crossing those t's. Not the case any longer?
Well, thanks to Manafort's lawyers, and their poor redaction, the smoke has given way to fire as the indictment indicates Mueller can demonstrate that Manafort shared internal polling data with Kilimnik. And Manafort isn't denying meeting with Kilimnik.Bringing this over from another thread because I want to comment on it.
ETA: That isn't to just dismiss the remote possibility that Trump will come out of this unscathed, at least directly. His "mentor" was Roy Cohen, ffs and the people--the sycophants--that suckerfished him are adept at making sure nothing leads directly up the chain, so it is obviously never outside the realm of possibilities that Mueller ends up inadvertently exonerating Trump. Doubtful in all that we've seen so far, but there is, of course, a significant difference between what we believe to be true and what can be proven in a court of law. So there is that.
This seems to indicate that you're beginning to lay the groundwork for backing out of many of those super obvious things you have been claiming Trump and company are definitely guilty of. You use the word "inadvertently" in regards to Mueller's findings and yet the argument here has been that Mueller is taking so long to wrap up because he is maticulously dotting those i's and crossing those t's. Not the case any longer?
This is the paradox of the whole situation. I think the big question on everyone’s mind is, “How stupid are these people?”
By that I mean, That there is WAY too much smoke for there not to be fire, but how does a group of grown men attempt too pull off such a brazen conspiracy without having a fail safe plan? The risk reward just isn’t good enough without a 100% foolproof plan.
I have no doubts they are guilty, I would bet my life of it. But how stupid are they? It’s hard to believe they would just throw their lives away like that.
Well, thanks to Manafort's lawyers, and their poor redaction, the smoke has given way to fire as the indictment indicates Mueller can demonstrate that Manafort shared internal polling data with Kilimnik. And Manafort isn't denying meeting with Kilimnik.This is the paradox of the whole situation. I think the big question on everyone’s mind is, “How stupid are these people?”
By that I mean, That there is WAY too much smoke for there not to be fire, but how does a group of grown men attempt too pull off such a brazen conspiracy without having a fail safe plan? The risk reward just isn’t good enough without a 100% foolproof plan.
I have no doubts they are guilty, I would bet my life of it. But how stupid are they? It’s hard to believe they would just throw their lives away like that.
To be clear, I doubt Mueller would be involved in this still, if there wasn't some substantial case to be brought forth. The Trump Campaign team is neck deep in Russian contacts and Mueller apparently can show that Manafort was coordinating their campaign with the Russians.