• Welcome to the new Internet Infidels Discussion Board, formerly Talk Freethought.

Mueller investigation

Why liberals are so nuts wishing with all their hearts to have our beloved president Trump out of office?

One group is preparing a case against Mr. Trump by sexual advances in certain women, and asking for impeachment.

This group is full of fanaticism and zero knowledge.

Mr. Bill Clinton wasn't exposed for impeachment by accusations alone. Neither by circumstantial evidence, like money given but no roots of the origin and reason for delivery.

In the case of Mr. Clinton the main accuser was Ms. Monica.

But, her accusation wasn't enough, and Mr. Bill Clinton was super happy that impeachments are not reached with the words of Monica.

But, Monica is not any virus, she then mentioned that she remember having the dress where the sperm of Mr. Clinton was drop after oral sex.

Mr. Clinton had no other choice but to accept the charges.

Evidence.

Only indisputable evidence can open the door for an impeachment process. Accusations might come from 500 women, but no evidence means no impeachment case.

Evidence.

In this case of the Russian collusion, the interference of Russians might was true, but there is no evidence that Mr. Trump was part of it.

No matter if the intervention of the Russians helped his candidature and winning of elections, if Mr. Trump wasn't part of it, then he still is the rightful president of the USA.

It wasn't the job of candidate Trump to investigate and stop the Russian interference in the elections, if the event happened, it was president Obama who was the responsible to do something.

Apparently president Obama decided to do nothing. He might have his reasons. However, if Mr. Trump won the elections thanks to an assumed help from Russians, such is not Mr. Trump's fault but Mr. Obama's.

If the members of the Republican campaign are guilty of such assumed conspiracy of Russian interference with the US elections, the ones to be under charges are the ones who participated in that interference, and again, Mr. Trump still is free of charges and still is the president of the USA until his term(s) expire.

Lets see how far Mr. Mueller investigation goes, so far it appears that this Russian collusion is just part of the revenge of liberals because Mrs. Hillary Clinton lost the elections... ha ha ha ha... I can't avoid laughing of how such a sure winner (Mrs. Clinton) lost so bad in front of a candidate who "had no chances of winning" just months before the elections.

The country is doing better than ever, the best for all of us is continue with Mr. Trump as the president, and if he wins again and has a second term... then the better of the better.
 
humbleman said:
Why liberals are so nuts wishing with all their hearts to have our beloved president Trump out of office?

One group is preparing a case against Mr. Trump by sexual advances in certain women, and asking for impeachment.

This group is full of fanaticism and zero knowledge.

Mr. Bill Clinton wasn't exposed for impeachment by accusations alone. Neither by circumstantial evidence, like money given but no roots of the origin and reason for delivery.

In the case of Mr. Clinton the main accuser was Ms. Monica.

But, her accusation wasn't enough, and Mr. Bill Clinton was super happy that impeachments are not reached with the words of Monica.

But, Monica is not any virus, she then mentioned that she remember having the dress where the sperm of Mr. Clinton was drop after oral sex.

Mr. Clinton had no other choice but to accept the charges.

Evidence.

Only indisputable evidence can open the door for an impeachment process. Accusations might come from 500 women, but no evidence means no impeachment case.

Evidence.

In this case of the Russian collusion, the interference of Russians might was true, but there is no evidence that Mr. Trump was part of it.

No matter if the intervention of the Russians helped his candidature and winning of elections, if Mr. Trump wasn't part of it, then he still is the rightful president of the USA.

It wasn't the job of candidate Trump to investigate and stop the Russian interference in the elections, if the event happened, it was president Obama who was the responsible to do something.

Apparently president Obama decided to do nothing. He might have his reasons. However, if Mr. Trump won the elections thanks to an assumed help from Russians, such is not Mr. Trump's fault but Mr. Obama's.

If the members of the Republican campaign are guilty of such assumed conspiracy of Russian interference with the US elections, the ones to be under charges are the ones who participated in that interference, and again, Mr. Trump still is free of charges and still is the president of the USA until his term(s) expire.

Lets see how far Mr. Mueller investigation goes, so far it appears that this Russian collusion is just part of the revenge of liberals because Mrs. Hillary Clinton lost the elections... ha ha ha ha... I can't avoid laughing of how such a sure winner (Mrs. Clinton) lost so bad in front of a candidate who "had no chances of winning" just months before the elections.

The country is doing better than ever, the best for all of us is continue with Mr. Trump as the president, and if he wins again and has a second term... then the better of the better.
Click to expand...

As teenagers like to say: I can't even...
 
humbleman said:
Why liberals are so nuts wishing with all their hearts to have our beloved president Trump out of office?
Click to expand...
“Beloved” ??? Seriously?

In the case of Mr. Clinton the main accuser was Ms. Monica.
Click to expand...

Surely you know that Monica Lewinsky did not accuse him of _anything._.
She was, against her wiill, pulled into the investigation because she confided in someone she thought was a friend. That “friend” took her confidential story public and ruined Monica’s life.

So given how terribly, carelessly, tragically wrong you are about that, and how comically wrong you were about the first statement you made (quoted above,) I stopped reading anything else you wrote on the assumption that it was also drivel.
 
humbleman said:
The country is doing better than ever, the best for all of us is continue with Mr. Trump as the president, and if he wins again and has a second term... then the better of the better.
Click to expand...

You gotta understand humbleman - as seen by the reaction to your post - the leftist absolutely hate that Trump is doing a great job on the economy. As James Carville correctly put it 26 years ago, "it's the economy, stupid." All of the hysterical predictions that the economy would noise dive under Trump have proven extraordinarily wrong. Even the recent tax cut, which according to Pelosi would render Armageddon, has been boon, boon, boon. Over three million people have or will receive Trump bonuses. Wages are going up. Investment is up. Companies are re-shoring profits. The stock market is at records highs. None of this would have happened if Clinton had been elected. To comfort themselves, the leftists bray on about Russia, Russia, Russia. Unless you're a partisan loony, you probably don't care about that. And most people don't. So just sit back and wait for the inevitable exoneration of Trump as there's nothing substantial to the partisan claims against him. When that happens, the leftist reaction will be funnier than when Trump won the election.

 
Trausti said:
You gotta understand humbleman - as seen by the reaction to your post - the leftist absolutely hate that Trump is doing a great job on the economy. As James Carville correctly put it 26 years ago, "it's the economy, stupid." All of the hysterical predictions that the economy would noise dive under Trump have proven extraordinarily wrong. Even the recent tax cut, which according to Pelosi would render Armageddon, has been boon, boon, boon. Over three million people have or will receive Trump bonuses. Wages are going up. Investment is up. Companies are ....
Click to expand...
The idea that any President affects the economy in the short run is laughable. There simply is not enough time for any actions to have a large effect. The economy was on the upswing before the POTUS election. Trump will credit for this (as any President would), but that does not mean the President deserves credit for it. Now, if in 2 to 3 years, there is an incredible boom, then one can make the case that Trump helped or caused it.
 
laughing dog said:
Trausti said:
You gotta understand humbleman - as seen by the reaction to your post - the leftist absolutely hate that Trump is doing a great job on the economy. As James Carville correctly put it 26 years ago, "it's the economy, stupid." All of the hysterical predictions that the economy would noise dive under Trump have proven extraordinarily wrong. Even the recent tax cut, which according to Pelosi would render Armageddon, has been boon, boon, boon. Over three million people have or will receive Trump bonuses. Wages are going up. Investment is up. Companies are ....
Click to expand...
The idea that any President affects the economy in the short run is laughable. There simply is not enough time for any actions to have a large effect. The economy was on the upswing before the POTUS election. Trump will credit for this (as any President would), but that does not mean the President deserves credit for it. Now, if in 2 to 3 years, there is an incredible boom, then one can make the case that Trump helped or caused it.
Click to expand...

You mean in the same way he's now claiming to have solved unemployment by African Americans within his first year in office?
 
braces_for_impact said:
laughing dog said:
Trausti said:
You gotta understand humbleman - as seen by the reaction to your post - the leftist absolutely hate that Trump is doing a great job on the economy. As James Carville correctly put it 26 years ago, "it's the economy, stupid." All of the hysterical predictions that the economy would noise dive under Trump have proven extraordinarily wrong. Even the recent tax cut, which according to Pelosi would render Armageddon, has been boon, boon, boon. Over three million people have or will receive Trump bonuses. Wages are going up. Investment is up. Companies are ....
Click to expand...
The idea that any President affects the economy in the short run is laughable. There simply is not enough time for any actions to have a large effect. The economy was on the upswing before the POTUS election. Trump will credit for this (as any President would), but that does not mean the President deserves credit for it. Now, if in 2 to 3 years, there is an incredible boom, then one can make the case that Trump helped or caused it.
Click to expand...

You mean in the same way he's now claiming to have solved unemployment by African Americans within his first year in office?
Click to expand...
It is incredible how 2+% growth under Trump is boomtown and 2+% growth under Obama is busttown.

Anyone notice right-wingers aren't raising 'underemployment' as much now?
 
humbleman said:
Evidence.

In this case of the Russian collusion, the interference of Russians might was true, but there is no evidence that Mr. Trump was part of it.

No matter if the intervention of the Russians helped his candidature and winning of elections, if Mr. Trump wasn't part of it, then he still is the rightful president of the USA.
Click to expand...

Why are there so many Trump supporters who seem to be blissfully unaware that there was no evidence that Nixon was part of the Watergate burglary and yet he ended up resigning due to his impending impeachment and conviction for the very serious crime of obstruction of justice?
 
Artemus said:
Why are there so many Trump supporters who seem to be blissfully unaware that there was no evidence that Nixon was part of the Watergate burglary and yet he ended up resigning due to his impending impeachment and conviction for the very serious crime of obstruction of justice?
Click to expand...

Good question. I don’t know why, but it is certainly a widespread affliction that they do not know how to understand or handle evidence.
 
Jimmy Higgins said:
Anyone notice right-wingers aren't raising 'underemployment' as much now?
Click to expand...

It is rather curious that right-wing commentators no longer try to downplay a positive unemployment rate by mentioning that U6--the real unemployment figure--is ever so much higher.
 
James Brown said:
It is rather curious that right-wing commentators no longer try to downplay a positive unemployment rate by mentioning that U6--the real unemployment figure--is ever so much higher.
Click to expand...

Is there a current U6 number?
 
JohnG said:
humbleman said:
Why liberals are so nuts wishing with all their hearts to have our ....
Click to expand...

Im genuinely curious...Do you ever wonder why the Russians wanted Trump to win?
Click to expand...

Two options:

1) Things which fuck up the US are good for Russia.

2) Russians have loaned His Flatulence lots and lots of money. That's a certain amount of control.
 
Loren Pechtel said:
JohnG said:
humbleman said:
Why liberals are so nuts wishing with all their hearts to have our ....
Click to expand...

Im genuinely curious...Do you ever wonder why the Russians wanted Trump to win?
Click to expand...

Two options:

1) Things which fuck up the US are good for Russia.

2) Russians have loaned His Flatulence lots and lots of money. That's a certain amount of control.
Click to expand...

Or they know that US right wing authoritarians, particularly Trump and his family and closest BFFs, are notoriously oblivious and suggestible. If I were a foreign power, I'd invite all the Trumps to come visit. I'd tell them to keep it secret because those nasty Democrats would use it against them when obviously it's just a friendly visit and nothing else. Then I'd flatter them and listen to them tell me everything I want to know and make deals with them that compromise US security and intelligence. OH wait, Russia and China have already done that. LOLZ.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom