• Welcome to the new Internet Infidels Discussion Board, formerly Talk Freethought.

Pelosi: Impeachment Is Moving Forward

Jeff Flake said this morning that if the Republicans in the Senate could vote anonymously, about 34 of them would support impeachment. What a bunch of chicken shits! Perhaps as the public supports impeachment in greater numbers, they will grow a pair and do the right thing.

Meanwhile, my neighbors who we call "the rednecks" put a big Trump flag on the back of one of their huge ugly pick up trucks so they could drive around town to piss off the liberals. Those are the types that will never admit that Trump is a criminal.

Perhaps an utterly corrupt political system that offers nothing but the lessor of two evils ain't all it's cracked up to be?

Perhaps all we need is a better informed voting populace that knows how to see through already transparent demonization tactics that rely on false equivalencies?
 
Jeff Flake said this morning that if the Republicans in the Senate could vote anonymously, about 34 of them would support impeachment. What a bunch of chicken shits! Perhaps as the public supports impeachment in greater numbers, they will grow a pair and do the right thing.

Meanwhile, my neighbors who we call "the rednecks" put a big Trump flag on the back of one of their huge ugly pick up trucks so they could drive around town to piss off the liberals. Those are the types that will never admit that Trump is a criminal.

Perhaps an utterly corrupt political system that offers nothing but the lessor of two evils ain't all it's cracked up to be?

Perhaps all we need is a better informed voting populace that knows how to see through already transparent demonization tactics that rely on false equivalencies?

Well isn't that what your TV is for? Half of the public is informed enough to understand the vote is a ruse; they don't even bother to show up. Because they know that if the choice is a lessor of evils, ya still wind up with evil.
 
Jeff Flake said this morning that if the Republicans in the Senate could vote anonymously, about 34 of them would support impeachment. What a bunch of chicken shits! Perhaps as the public supports impeachment in greater numbers, they will grow a pair and do the right thing.

Meanwhile, my neighbors who we call "the rednecks" put a big Trump flag on the back of one of their huge ugly pick up trucks so they could drive around town to piss off the liberals. Those are the types that will never admit that Trump is a criminal.

Perhaps an utterly corrupt political system that offers nothing but the lessor of two evils ain't all it's cracked up to be?

Perhaps all we need is a better informed voting populace that knows how to see through already transparent demonization tactics that rely on false equivalencies?
Well, umm... I wouldn't doubt it if the GOP went to Supreme Court to find that unconstitutional... on a 5-4 vote.
 
Nancy Pelosi says Attorney General William Barr has 'gone rogue'
  • House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said Friday that Attorney General William Barr has “gone rogue.”
  • Barr is mentioned in an explosive whistleblower complaint and in a memorandum of a July 25 phone call in which Trump asks Ukraine’s president “if you can look into” allegations against Joe Biden and his son.
  • The complaint led Pelosi to launch an impeachment inquiry into President Donald Trump this week.

Mike Pence urged Trump not to release Ukraine call transcript
Vice President Mike Pence urged President Trump not to release the rough transcript of his call with the president of Ukraine, raising concerns about the precedent such a release would set, according to a report.
 
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/trump-whistleblower-impeachment/2019/09/27/55b99276-e0a8-11e9-8dc8-498eabc129a0_story.html



Aaaaaaaaaaand the House Dems are on recess.


Not all of them.


Members of the House Intelligence Committee plan to continue working next week through Congress’s scheduled recess, as Democrats seek to build a case for impeachment based on President Trump’s controversial call with the leader of Ukraine.

Lawmakers shared their plans hours after Trump called for the committee’s chairman to resign and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) accused Attorney General William P. Barr of having “gone rogue.”

The fallout from a whistleblower’s complaint about Trump’s July call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky played out on Capitol Hill, Twitter and television Friday, as the number of Democrats supporting the impeachment inquiry launched by Pelosi continued to grow.

Meanwhile, more than 300 former U.S. national security and foreign policy officials signed a statement supporting an impeachment inquiry based on Trump’s pressing Zelensky during their July call to investigate former vice president Joe Biden, a 2020 Democratic presidential contender, and his son Hunter Biden.
 
Nancy Pelosi says Attorney General William Barr has 'gone rogue'
  • House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said Friday that Attorney General William Barr has “gone rogue.”
  • Barr is mentioned in an explosive whistleblower complaint and in a memorandum of a July 25 phone call in which Trump asks Ukraine’s president “if you can look into” allegations against Joe Biden and his son.
  • The complaint led Pelosi to launch an impeachment inquiry into President Donald Trump this week.

Mike Pence urged Trump not to release Ukraine call transcript
Vice President Mike Pence urged President Trump not to release the rough transcript of his call with the president of Ukraine, raising concerns about the precedent such a release would set, according to a report.

I'll say it again - Tricky Don fears Pelosi more than anything else. She's the one thing he cannot control or influence and it bothers hell out of him. I don't know if Trumpo has the intellect to actually know fear but Pelosi must come the closest to scaring the shit out of him.
 
Do you want to take a shot at the question I asked? What was the favor?

I will take a shot. The favor was to investigate Joe and Hunter Biden, Trump's political opponent and his opponents son.

Can you highlight what in the transcript led you to believe this?

The "I would like you to do is a favor" part is close to the top.

The President: I would like you to do us a favor though because our country has been through a lot and Ukraine knows a lot about it. I would like you to find out what happened with this whole situation with Ukraine, they say Crowdstrike... I guess you have one of your wealthy people... The server, they say Ukraine has it. There are a lot of things that went on, the whole situation. I think you're surrounding yourself with some of the same people. I would like to have the Attorney General call you or your people and I would like you to get to the bottom of it. As you saw yesterday, that whole nonsense ended with a very poor performance by a man named Robert Mueller, an incompetent performance, but they say a lot of it started with Ukraine. Whatever you can do, it's very important that you do it if that's possible.

https://www.cnn.com/2019/09/25/politics/donald-trump-ukraine-transcript-call/index.html
 
Can you highlight what in the transcript led you to believe this?

The "I would like you to do is a favor" part is close to the top.

The President: I would like you to do us a favor though because our country has been through a lot and Ukraine knows a lot about it. I would like you to find out what happened with this whole situation with Ukraine, they say Crowdstrike... I guess you have one of your wealthy people... The server, they say Ukraine has it. There are a lot of things that went on, the whole situation. I think you're surrounding yourself with some of the same people. I would like to have the Attorney General call you or your people and I would like you to get to the bottom of it. As you saw yesterday, that whole nonsense ended with a very poor performance by a man named Robert Mueller, an incompetent performance, but they say a lot of it started with Ukraine. Whatever you can do, it's very important that you do it if that's possible.

https://www.cnn.com/2019/09/25/politics/donald-trump-ukraine-transcript-call/index.html

There are three favors, not one.
 
For the disingenuous, the obtuse, and assorted literalist conservolibertarians:
"Good because I heard you had a prosecutor who was very good and he was shut down and that's really unfair. A lot of people are talking about that, the way they shut your very good prosecutor down and you had some very bad people involved. Mr. Giuliani is a highly respected man. He was the mayor of New York City, a great mayor, and I would like him to call you. I will ask him to call you along with the Attorney General. Rudy very much knows what's happening and he is a very capable guy. If you could speak to him that would be great. The former ambassador from the United States, the woman, was bad news and the people she was dealing with in the Ukraine were bad news so I just want to let you know that. The other thing, There's a lot of talk about Biden's son, that Biden stopped the prosecution and a lot of people want to find out about that so whatever you can do with the Attorney General would be great. Biden went around bragging that he stopped the prosecution so if you can look into it... It sounds horrible to me."​

The groupings of words that are highlighted are called sentences. There are two sentences highlighted. The words when strung together in a particular order convey meaning. The sentences reflect Donald Trump saying he wants something by saying if you could do X, "that would be great" and "if you can look into it ..." The three dots at the end are called an ellipsis and indicate a pause or something missing such as the implied, but unnecessary that'd be great. It's not a literal thing and essentially means I'd like you to do this.

If you have any more reading comprehension problems, please ask the forum.

We are here to help!
 
"I would like you to do us a favor though..."

The "though" is a modifier to the previous statement, which dismal failed to include.
This is the very definition of quid pro quo.
 

"450 pages of the Mueller report couldn't bring this man down but a transcript of a phone call will definitely get him!!" - Unhinged leftists off their medication

Obama and every other President made calls like these. World leaders doing favors for each other is as common as water in the ocean.

It's another big old nothing burger.
 

"450 pages of the Mueller report couldn't bring this man down but a transcript of a phone call will definitely get him!!" - Unhinged leftists off their medication

Obama and every other President made calls like these. World leaders doing favors for each other is as common as water in the ocean.

It's another big old nothing burger.


Trump broke the law.
1. Extortion
2. Bribery
3. Demanding help to interfere with an election to destroy a political opponent.

We now have an ongoing investigation to get all the facts. If enough illegality can be established, if the Senate refuses to impeach, despite all the evidence, a grand jury could be convened and this all could move to the legal arena. This is what happened to Spiro Agnew. He was offered a deal he could not refuse. Resign or this could be taken to trial and Spiro could go to prison.

Now, Trump in such a scenario would argue that one cannot indict a sitting president. Or try one in a court of law. Which would put things off wrangling all of this in court until his inevitable defeat. Then Trump loses his bargaining chip, resignation, to stay out of prison.
Agnew was smart enough to grab the deal offered and quit.

Lots of very bad things can still happen to Trump besides mere impeachment. This could get nasty indeed.
 

"450 pages of the Mueller report couldn't bring this man down but a transcript of a phone call will definitely get him!!" - Unhinged leftists off their medication

Obama and every other President made calls like these. World leaders doing favors for each other is as common as water in the ocean.

It's another big old nothing burger.


Trump broke the law.
1. Extortion
2. Bribery
3. Demanding help to interfere with an election to destroy a political opponent.

We now have an ongoing investigation to get all the facts. If enough illegality can be established, if the Senate refuses to impeach, despite all the evidence, a grand jury could be convened and this all could move to the legal arena. This is what happened to Spiro Agnew. He was offered a deal he could not refuse. Resign or this could be taken to trial and Spiro could go to prison.

Now, Trump in such a scenario would argue that one cannot indict a sitting president. Or try one in a court of law. Which would put things off wrangling all of this in court until his inevitable defeat. Then Trump loses his bargaining chip, resignation, to stay out of prison.
Agnew was smart enough to grab the deal offered and quit.

Lots of very bad things can still happen to Trump besides mere impeachment. This could get nasty indeed.

To your 3 points, he didn't break any laws. No one can show what these laws are that he broke. The rest of your post doesn't matter without the laws that Trump broke.
 
Trump broke the law.
1. Extortion
2. Bribery
3. Demanding help to interfere with an election to destroy a political opponent.

We now have an ongoing investigation to get all the facts. If enough illegality can be established, if the Senate refuses to impeach, despite all the evidence, a grand jury could be convened and this all could move to the legal arena. This is what happened to Spiro Agnew. He was offered a deal he could not refuse. Resign or this could be taken to trial and Spiro could go to prison.

Now, Trump in such a scenario would argue that one cannot indict a sitting president. Or try one in a court of law. Which would put things off wrangling all of this in court until his inevitable defeat. Then Trump loses his bargaining chip, resignation, to stay out of prison.
Agnew was smart enough to grab the deal offered and quit.

Lots of very bad things can still happen to Trump besides mere impeachment. This could get nasty indeed.

To your 3 points, he didn't break any laws. No one can show what these laws are that he broke. The rest of your post doesn't matter without the laws that Trump broke.

Yes, Trump did break laws here. MSNBC has had a long parade of constitutionsal lawyers, ex-prosecuters, ex-high ranking members of the Justice department and a veritable parade of lawyers and ex-judges with expertise who have stated with little room for wriggling that indeed these actions constitute illegal acts.

Sorry to pop your little bubble of illusions. Who do I trust here, numerous experts with experience, or you and Sean Insanity? Again, if the Democrats really wanted to play hardball with Trump in face of a GOP controlled Senate that will not act, Spiro Agnew, shows us what could happen. Me, I am going to believe the parade of experts MSNBC has interviewed to clear the air of the FUD spread by Trump and Faux News.
 
Back
Top Bottom