• Welcome to the Internet Infidels Discussion Board.

Republicans Seem To Have A Big Pedophile Problem

Another thing. Let's, for the sake of the argument, accept that "it's not pedophilia, it's ephebophilia!" Ok? Is that not just as bad as pedophilia? Am I missing something?
Pedophilia is easier to spell and pronounce.
Ironically, the word you are struggling with is correctly spelled "paedophillia", and the first syllable is pronounced "Pee-", but most people now spell and pronounce it incorrectly, so that it is analogous to "pedometer", and appears to describe a love of feet.

Your actual point is correct though, despite your poor etymology; Those who constantly and consistently derail discussions of the rape and abuse of children with this trivia are transparently showing a worrying desire not to talk about the immorality of raping children, and no matter what words are used, that's not a reassuring desire.

The fact is that the fine details don't matter. A sixty year old wealthy man who procures a twenty year old homeless woman for sex is clearly a vile abuser, despite having broken no laws and harmed no children.

The law has to draw a line somewhere, but doing so is a compromise, and for every unfair criminalisation of a "Romeo and Juliet" romance, there is an equally unfair legalisation of an abusive relationship that just happens to be technically lawful.
Goddamn pedantphiles...
 
Another thing. Let's, for the sake of the argument, accept that "it's not pedophilia, it's ephebophilia!" Ok? Is that not just as bad as pedophilia? Am I missing something?
Actually in my neighborhood, it's not just as bad a pedophilia, but the difference is small. Louisiana law makes distinctions base on the age of the victim(which for purposes of this discussion is always the younger person involved). S
An adult having sex with a minor age 12 or younger is considered aggravated rape, without regard to other circumstances. For older minors, there are degrees of criminality.

Louisiana laws are based on Napoleonic Code, which in simple English means every crime has a legal definition, along with degrees of severity and the punishment for each degree. Aggravated rape is at one end of the spectrum and "Misdemeanor Carnal Knowledge of a Juvenile" is a the the other. Every definition of degree contains the same qualification, "Lack of knowledge of the juvenile's age shall not be a defense."
 
Another thing. Let's, for the sake of the argument, accept that "it's not pedophilia, it's ephebophilia!" Ok? Is that not just as bad as pedophilia? Am I missing something?
Ephebophiles would certainly like you to think so. Don't trust anyone who feels strongly about this.
 
Another thing. Let's, for the sake of the argument, accept that "it's not pedophilia, it's ephebophilia!" Ok? Is that not just as bad as pedophilia? Am I missing something?
Ephebophiles would certainly like you to think so. Don't trust anyone who feels strongly about this.
I don't think any responsible people would willingly allow prepubescent children around a known ephebophile anyway either. Only creeps would do that. So why does the distinction matter?
 
Last edited:
Another thing. Let's, for the sake of the argument, accept that "it's not pedophilia, it's ephebophilia!" Ok? Is that not just as bad as pedophilia? Am I missing something?
Ephebophiles would certainly like you to think so. Don't trust anyone who feels strongly about this.
I don't think any responsible people would willingly allow prepubescent children around a known ephebophile anyway either. Only creeps would do that. So why does the distinction matter?
From my perspective, the distinction matters because without a distinction to make, pedophiles wouldn't out themselves in pointing it out, and then it would be harder to spot them...
 
Another thing. Let's, for the sake of the argument, accept that "it's not pedophilia, it's ephebophilia!" Ok? Is that not just as bad as pedophilia? Am I missing something?
Ephebophiles would certainly like you to think so. Don't trust anyone who feels strongly about this.
I don't think any responsible people would willingly allow prepubescent children around a known ephebophile anyway either. Only creeps would do that. So why does the distinction matter?
To a public discussion of crime and punishment? Not at all. To a therapist? These are different situations with different causes and best practices for treatment. For a keyboard warrior ephebophile? They're hoping you'll agree that their sins are less grievous and absolve them from what they have done or are thinking about doing.
 
I actually don't follow the news much, and only now have just heard of Andrew Tate and his brother. Wow!

Andrew is a rich celebrity: Kick-boxer, has his own Meme Crypto, etc. BUT he and his brother are essentially pimps and rapists with documented use of violence and coercion. They have a social media presence where they teach other men how to be pimps. Criminal cases or investigations are in progress in US, UK and Romania (where they had fled because of laxity).

Their fan base includes Tucker Carlson, Don Trump Jr. and ... Barron Trump!
Recent reports highlight an alleged connection between Andrew Tate and Barron Trump, including a Zoom call where they discussed Tate’s legal cases and other topics — which has become a major point of public discussion.

After Mar-a-Lago intervention the Tates were permitted to leave Romania and are now in UAE.
 
I actually don't follow the news much, and only now have just heard of Andrew Tate and his brother. Wow!

Andrew is a rich celebrity: Kick-boxer, has his own Meme Crypto, etc. BUT he and his brother are essentially pimps and rapists with documented use of violence and coercion. They have a social media presence where they teach other men how to be pimps. Criminal cases or investigations are in progress in US, UK and Romania (where they had fled because of laxity).

Their fan base includes Tucker Carlson, Don Trump Jr. and ... Barron Trump!
Recent reports highlight an alleged connection between Andrew Tate and Barron Trump, including a Zoom call where they discussed Tate’s legal cases and other topics — which has become a major point of public discussion.

After Mar-a-Lago intervention the Tates were permitted to leave Romania and are now in UAE.
I'm kind of shocked that this is the first you are hearing about the Tates.

I was unaware that they had fled to the modern-day slavery capital of the world, however.
 
I'm kind of shocked that this is the first you are hearing about the Tates.

IIDB is my main source of info. And I spend much time in the Science, Favorite Movies and Jesus-historicity threads.

I was unaware that they had fled to the modern-day slavery capital of the world, however.

News didn't say, so I asked ChatGPT where Andrew was right NOW. It said he was confined to Romania. I chastised it and asked it for better info. Chat apologized and said he's in UAE (preparing for a kick-boxing tourney?)
 
I'm kind of shocked that this is the first you are hearing about the Tates.

IIDB is my main source of info. And I spend much time in the Science, Favorite Movies and Jesus-historicity threads.

I was unaware that they had fled to the modern-day slavery capital of the world, however.

News didn't say, so I asked ChatGPT where Andrew was right NOW. It said he was confined to Romania. I chastised it and asked it for better info. Chat apologized and said he's in UAE (preparing for a kick-boxing tourney?)
IIDB is your main source of info? Oy vey...

That is funny about your talk with ChatGPT. Why was it not able to find the right info initially? Why does it feel the need to fuckaround rather than give it to you straight at the get-go?
 
IIDB is my main source of info. And I spend much time in the Science, Favorite Movies and Jesus-historicity threads.
IIDB is your main source of info? Oy vey...

I wrote "main source of news" initially, and changed the word -- very wrongly -- when I noted that the much-time-spending threads had nothing to do with news. I read a lot, but mostly 10- or 20-year old books (or older) so not "news."

I keep busy with games, puzzles, recreations, movies, exercise, unspecified excitements, etc. "Following the news" has little utility for me except as a (not particularly fun) recreation. I do form opinions about prudent savings investment but decisions are left to my kids.
That is funny about your talk with ChatGPT. Why was it not able to find the right info initially? Why does it feel the need to fuckaround rather than give it to you straight at the get-go?

I think there are threads discussing LLM incompetence. I asked simply "Where is Andrew Tate now?" (My fault: I could have hinted to ChatGPT about recent change of status.) Its incorrect) response began with "As of the latest reliable information in late 2025," and continued to "... Romania where they continue to live and must comply with judicial control."

Give it some credit. It closed its reply with "If you want the very latest news about his legal status or location (e.g., recent court dates or travel), I can look that up too."

I replied "Latest news pleasze. You seem unaware of most recent development."
It replied with more current info: "... Romania: Andrew and his brother remain under judicial control and associated with ongoing criminal proceedings ... Physically: He’s in Dubai (UAE) preparing for a boxing event on Dec 20, 2025."
 


Guys, it's okay. He wasn't talking about 5 year olds.

I remember hearing him say that on Howard Stern. Even Stern was left speechless and fumbling for a moment and IIRC, he tried to get the conversation on a different track. Stern has a long history of Anything Goes on his show, but that crossed a line even for him.

When Trump ran in 2016 I thought this would come out and immediately send him packing. But it didn't. Prior to then it would've prevented anyone from becoming a candidate. The GOP simply wouldn't have allowed him to get within a hundred miles of their headquarters. Even tiny third parties would've laughed him out of the building.

Then the fraudulent Trump University issue came out just a few months before the election. Then the pussy grabber thing. There were dozens of slimy things that came out but nothing mattered.

Just like the death of a loved one reveals the character of the bereaved, 9/11 revealed the character of half this nation. It's disgraceful.
 
Another thing. Let's, for the sake of the argument, accept that "it's not pedophilia, it's ephebophilia!" Ok? Is that not just as bad as pedophilia? Am I missing something?
Ephebophiles would certainly like you to think so. Don't trust anyone who feels strongly about this.
Ugh. It's an unseemly topic, but I do think it's important to make the distinction because the psychological effects can be very different, and therefore treatment is different. Neither crime is defensible, but to lump them in together does a disservice to the victims. For example pre-pubescent rape doesn't result in pregnancy while post-pubescent rape can result in pregnancy, which creates egregious issues in states that want to ban all abortions no matter the circumstances.

I may be sensitive to this issue, and I won't go into detail, but this happened to one of my own kids. We didn't know about it until years later and the tragedy continues to this day for her, me, her mother, and her siblings. It's a type of devastation that seems to have no end.
 
Back
Top Bottom