starwater
Veteran Member
- Joined
- Apr 7, 2017
- Messages
- 1,420
- Location
- Rocky Mountains
- Basic Beliefs
- Moving to the 4th Dimension
Women of Alaska are very independent! She must have some second thoughts.
Donald Trump’s genius for misdirection is to pile so many obvious ruses upon so many ham-handed sleights that the easily fooled parts of his audience are impressed by the audacity, while the more sophisticated parts of his audience, on left and right both, become so fatigued by the constant motion that they stop paying sufficient attention to the core point of the deception.
Trump’s purpose in appointing Kavanaugh to the Court was clearly to provide himself with a protective vote for whenever one issue or another arising from his misbehavior makes its way there.
Wow. Collins and Murkowski split votes. So if Manchin and Collins vote no, he's out. But I don't see Collins changing her vote.Murkowski votes NO!
Collins says Kavanaugh isn’t a threat to Roe v Wade. Yes, that is why he has the full backing of the GOP.
Collins is giving a rambling speech that makes me feel pretty certain she will vote yes. I had to change the station because it was too depressing to listen to her. It looks like this one goes to Trump unless one of the other Republican Senators grows a pair. WWJD? No, not Jesus. I was wondering what John McCain would do if he were still around. He might have been the one that made a difference, but too late now.
Manchin says he'll vote yes.
Manchin says he'll vote yes.
Manchin would have only voted no if it stopped Kavanaugh.
Manchin says he'll vote yes.
Manchin would have only voted no if it stopped Kavanaugh.
That's a possible explanation. However, Manchin would have voted no on this, if Collins were willing to, because he would not want to face Democrats as the person who installed Kavanaugh on SCOTUS. So it really is Collins who is driving this, and she clearly is leaning to confirm Kavanaugh. I see very little chance that she will block him. When a delegation of Maine women showed up in her office yesterday to confront her on this, she was nowhere to be found. The women had to present their case to staffers. That in itself was a clear signal. Murkowski had met with her constituents in person.
That's a possible explanation. However, Manchin would have voted no on this, if Collins were willing to, because he would not want to face Democrats as the person who installed Kavanaugh on SCOTUS. So it really is Collins who is driving this, and she clearly is leaning to confirm Kavanaugh. I see very little chance that she will block him. When a delegation of Maine women showed up in her office yesterday to confront her on this, she was nowhere to be found. The women had to present their case to staffers. That in itself was a clear signal. Murkowski had met with her constituents in person.
I read somewhere that she would've faced a primary threat had she not voted for BK.
The third set of allegations, by Julie Swetnick, seem much more likely to shock them back to their previous position. Swetnick charges that Kavanaugh, along with his ubiquitous wingman Mark Judge, systematically got girls drunk at a beach weekend and at least witnessed, and more likely participated in, a group rape.
A friend of Christine Blasey Ford told FBI investigators that she felt pressured by Dr. Ford’s allies to revisit her initial statement that she knew nothing about an alleged sexual assault by a teenage Brett Kavanaugh, which she later updated to say that she believed but couldn’t corroborate Dr. Ford’s account, according to people familiar with the matter.
Leland Keyser, who Dr. Ford has said was present at the gathering where she was allegedly assaulted in the 1980s, told investigators that Monica McLean, a retired Federal Bureau of Investigation agent and a friend of Dr. Ford’s, had urged her to clarify her statement, the people said.
The statement to the FBI offers a glimpse into how Dr. Ford’s allies were working behind the scenes to lobby old classmates to bolster their versions of the alleged incident, as were Judge Kavanaugh’s.
Michael Avenatti said:@SenatorCollins should be ashamed of herself for attacking my client and Dr. Ford. How did she make a credibility determination as to my client? How is she qualified to do that without ANY investigation? She did ZERO to determine whether my client and her witnesses were credible.
@SenatorCollins does not have the judgment to be a US Senator. She never met my client, never had her interviewed, never met the 6 witnesses supporting her declaration or had them interviewed, and never cross examined my client. And yet she made a credibility determination. How?
Michael Avenatti said:@SenatorCollins should be ashamed of herself for attacking my client and Dr. Ford. How did she make a credibility determination as to my client? How is she qualified to do that without ANY investigation? She did ZERO to determine whether my client and her witnesses were credible.
@SenatorCollins does not have the judgment to be a US Senator. She never met my client, never had her interviewed, never met the 6 witnesses supporting her declaration or had them interviewed, and never cross examined my client. And yet she made a credibility determination. How?
https://mobile.twitter.com/MichaelAvenatti/status/1048297890190376961